Does one model fit all mAbs? An evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models.

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
mAbs Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1080/19420862.2025.2512217
Stefan P H van den Berg, Philine E A Adolfsen, Thomas P C Dorlo, Theo Rispens
{"title":"Does one model fit all mAbs? An evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models.","authors":"Stefan P H van den Berg, Philine E A Adolfsen, Thomas P C Dorlo, Theo Rispens","doi":"10.1080/19420862.2025.2512217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibodies are extensively used in treating various diseases, with over 100 canonical monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) approved. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models are typically developed for each individual mAb, despite their similarities in size, shape, and susceptibility to lysosomal degradation. However, sparse datasets with limited PK information pose challenges in deriving accurate parameter estimates. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of 160 published models of 69 mAbs, administered either intravenously or subcutaneously, examining their structural, statistical, and covariate components. Median estimates for the base parameters are linear clearance (0.22 L/d), central volume (3.42 L), peripheral volume (2.68 L), intercompartmental clearance (0.54 L/d), absorption rate (0.25 L/d), and bioavailability (69%). Using these to simulate a 'generic' mAb results in plausible kinetics with a terminal half-life of 21 ds. We demonstrated that the median linear clearance was 26% lower in models that included nonlinear target-mediated kinetics, when compared to linear models (0.18 vs. 0.25 L/d). For chimeric mAbs median linear clearance was 50% higher compared to fully human and humanized mAbs. Variability in PK parameter estimates across models was comparable to the inter-individual variability, which have consistently shown to be large for mAbs PK (e.g. 55% vs. 43% for clearance and 25% vs. 30% for central volume, respectively). Our meta-analysis suggests that a priori parameter estimates derived from the large body of existing pharmacokinetic models for mAbs are representative for many mAbs and can facilitate the design of new and/or more complex pharmacokinetic models or assist in dose optimization models.</p>","PeriodicalId":18206,"journal":{"name":"mAbs","volume":"17 1","pages":"2512217"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mAbs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2025.2512217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibodies are extensively used in treating various diseases, with over 100 canonical monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) approved. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models are typically developed for each individual mAb, despite their similarities in size, shape, and susceptibility to lysosomal degradation. However, sparse datasets with limited PK information pose challenges in deriving accurate parameter estimates. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of 160 published models of 69 mAbs, administered either intravenously or subcutaneously, examining their structural, statistical, and covariate components. Median estimates for the base parameters are linear clearance (0.22 L/d), central volume (3.42 L), peripheral volume (2.68 L), intercompartmental clearance (0.54 L/d), absorption rate (0.25 L/d), and bioavailability (69%). Using these to simulate a 'generic' mAb results in plausible kinetics with a terminal half-life of 21 ds. We demonstrated that the median linear clearance was 26% lower in models that included nonlinear target-mediated kinetics, when compared to linear models (0.18 vs. 0.25 L/d). For chimeric mAbs median linear clearance was 50% higher compared to fully human and humanized mAbs. Variability in PK parameter estimates across models was comparable to the inter-individual variability, which have consistently shown to be large for mAbs PK (e.g. 55% vs. 43% for clearance and 25% vs. 30% for central volume, respectively). Our meta-analysis suggests that a priori parameter estimates derived from the large body of existing pharmacokinetic models for mAbs are representative for many mAbs and can facilitate the design of new and/or more complex pharmacokinetic models or assist in dose optimization models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一个模型适合所有mab吗?群体药代动力学模型的评价。
抗体广泛用于治疗各种疾病,已有100多种标准单克隆抗体(mab)获得批准。群体药代动力学(PK)模型通常针对每个单抗开发,尽管它们在大小,形状和对溶酶体降解的易感性方面具有相似性。然而,具有有限PK信息的稀疏数据集在获得准确的参数估计方面提出了挑战。在这里,我们提供了69单抗的160个已发表模型的全面概述,通过静脉注射或皮下注射,检查其结构、统计和协变量成分。基本参数的中位数估计为线性清除率(0.22 L/d)、中心容积(3.42 L)、外周容积(2.68 L)、室间清除率(0.54 L/d)、吸收率(0.25 L/d)和生物利用度(69%)。使用这些来模拟一个“通用”单抗,其最终半衰期为21天。我们证明,与线性模型相比,包含非线性靶介导动力学的模型中位线性间隙降低了26% (0.18 vs 0.25 L/d)。嵌合单抗的中位线性清除率比完全人源单抗和人源单抗高50%。模型间PK参数估计的可变性与个体间可变性相当,单抗PK的可变性一直很大(例如,清除率分别为55%对43%,中心容积分别为25%对30%)。我们的荟萃分析表明,从大量现有的单抗药代动力学模型中得出的先验参数估计对许多单抗药代动力学模型具有代表性,可以促进设计新的和/或更复杂的药代动力学模型或协助剂量优化模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
mAbs
mAbs 工程技术-仪器仪表
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
11.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: mAbs is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to the art and science of antibody research and development. The journal has a strong scientific and medical focus, but also strives to serve a broader readership. The articles are thus of interest to scientists, clinical researchers, and physicians, as well as the wider mAb community, including our readers involved in technology transfer, legal issues, investment, strategic planning and the regulation of therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信