Surgery Alone for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Should We Operate if Multimodal Treatment is Off the Table?

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Roi Anteby, Peter J Fagenholz, Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo, William G Kastrinakis, Keith D Lillemoe, Motaz Qadan
{"title":"Surgery Alone for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Should We Operate if Multimodal Treatment is Off the Table?","authors":"Roi Anteby, Peter J Fagenholz, Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo, William G Kastrinakis, Keith D Lillemoe, Motaz Qadan","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Operative intervention with multimodal therapy, including systemic therapy and/or radiation, is routinely used in the curative-intent treatment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Occasionally, patients are unable to undergo multimodal therapy. However, contemporary data on the benefit of surgery-alone for patients with resectable PDAC are limited.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with resectable (clinical stage ≤II) PDAC between 2010-2016. Patients who underwent upfront resection without additional treatment were compared to those who refused surgery, to determine the comparative role of isolated surgical intervention for PDAC. Propensity score matching was used to account for selection bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,391 (6.1%) underwent upfront curative-intent resection without further treatment and 485 (1.2%) refused recommended surgery. Propensity matching resulted in 471 well-balanced pairs. In the surgery group, 30-day and 90-day mortality was 7% (n=33) and 17% (n=81), respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 14.09 months (95% CI: 12.39, 16.72) compared to 6.34 months (95% CI: 5.72, 6.9) in the no treatment group (log rank test p < 0.001). Estimated 1-year OS rates were 56% (95% CI: 51.7, 60.8) vs. 26% (95% CI: 22.3, 30.6), respectively. For patients who underwent surgery with R0 resection, median OS was 17.87 months (95% CI: 14.7, 21.3) compared to 7.56 months (95% CI: 6.5, 11.5) for non-R0 resection (log rank test p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This national study of patients with early stage PDAC affirms that surgical resection, in the absence of multimodal therapy, is associated with improved outcomes compared with no resection. However, the association with improved survival is clinically annulled in the absence of a negative-margin resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Operative intervention with multimodal therapy, including systemic therapy and/or radiation, is routinely used in the curative-intent treatment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Occasionally, patients are unable to undergo multimodal therapy. However, contemporary data on the benefit of surgery-alone for patients with resectable PDAC are limited.

Study design: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with resectable (clinical stage ≤II) PDAC between 2010-2016. Patients who underwent upfront resection without additional treatment were compared to those who refused surgery, to determine the comparative role of isolated surgical intervention for PDAC. Propensity score matching was used to account for selection bias.

Results: A total of 2,391 (6.1%) underwent upfront curative-intent resection without further treatment and 485 (1.2%) refused recommended surgery. Propensity matching resulted in 471 well-balanced pairs. In the surgery group, 30-day and 90-day mortality was 7% (n=33) and 17% (n=81), respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 14.09 months (95% CI: 12.39, 16.72) compared to 6.34 months (95% CI: 5.72, 6.9) in the no treatment group (log rank test p < 0.001). Estimated 1-year OS rates were 56% (95% CI: 51.7, 60.8) vs. 26% (95% CI: 22.3, 30.6), respectively. For patients who underwent surgery with R0 resection, median OS was 17.87 months (95% CI: 14.7, 21.3) compared to 7.56 months (95% CI: 6.5, 11.5) for non-R0 resection (log rank test p<0.001).

Conclusions: This national study of patients with early stage PDAC affirms that surgical resection, in the absence of multimodal therapy, is associated with improved outcomes compared with no resection. However, the association with improved survival is clinically annulled in the absence of a negative-margin resection.

单独手术治疗可切除的胰腺腺癌:如果多模式治疗不可行,我们是否应该手术?
背景:手术干预与多模式治疗,包括全身治疗和/或放射治疗,是常规用于治疗意图治疗的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者。有时,患者无法接受多模式治疗。然而,目前关于手术治疗可切除PDAC患者的益处的数据有限。研究设计:查询国家癌症数据库(NCDB) 2010-2016年间诊断为可切除(临床分期≤II期)PDAC的患者。将未接受额外治疗的术前切除患者与拒绝手术的患者进行比较,以确定单独手术干预对PDAC的比较作用。倾向评分匹配用于解释选择偏差。结果:共有2391例(6.1%)患者在没有进一步治疗的情况下接受了早期治疗目的切除,485例(1.2%)患者拒绝推荐手术。倾向匹配得到471对平衡良好的配对。手术组30天和90天死亡率分别为7% (n=33)和17% (n=81)。中位总生存期(OS)为14.09个月(95% CI: 12.39, 16.72),而未治疗组为6.34个月(95% CI: 5.72, 6.9) (log rank检验p < 0.001)。估计1年OS率分别为56% (95% CI: 51.7, 60.8)和26% (95% CI: 22.3, 30.6)。对于接受R0切除手术的患者,中位OS为17.87个月(95% CI: 14.7, 21.3),而非R0切除患者的中位OS为7.56个月(95% CI: 6.5, 11.5) (log rank检验)。结论:这项针对早期PDAC患者的全国性研究证实,在没有多模式治疗的情况下,手术切除与不切除相比可改善预后。然而,在没有负切缘切除术的情况下,与生存率提高的相关性在临床上被取消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信