Awake Versus Asleep Intubation for Mediastinal Goiters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Lindsay E Booth, Norbert Banyi, Peter Rose, Shamir Karmali, Biljana Jonoska Stojkova, Donald W Anderson, Oleksandr Butskiy
{"title":"Awake Versus Asleep Intubation for Mediastinal Goiters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Lindsay E Booth, Norbert Banyi, Peter Rose, Shamir Karmali, Biljana Jonoska Stojkova, Donald W Anderson, Oleksandr Butskiy","doi":"10.1177/19160216251333352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ImportanceMediastinal goiters can complicate anesthetic management, and although awake bronchoscopic intubation is the gold standard, it is resource-intensive and may be unpleasant for patients. In many centers across North America, patients undergoing thyroidectomy for mediastinal goiters are routinely intubated awake.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of intubation in patients selected for awake versus asleep intubation for thyroidectomy of mediastinal goiters.DesignPRISMA 2020 Checklist for systematic reviews was followed. A search was performed in the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Two independent reviewers performed abstract and full-text review. Data were extracted in duplicate. Study quality was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tool. To account for heterogeneity, a 3-level random-effects model was constructed using the Der Simonian and Laird method with an arcsine transformation.Setting and ParticipantsPatients undergoing thyroidectomy for benign mediastinal goiters.Intervention and ExposuresAwake or asleep intubation.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Rate of failed intubations in asleep intubation and proportion of uncomplicated intubations in asleep and awake populations.ResultsTwelve of 490 identified studies, involving 1002 patients, were included. Three cases of failed intubations were found in the asleep intubation group, with an overall incidence of failed intubation of 0.3%. Meta-analysis demonstrated an overall uncomplicated intubation rate of 91% (95% CI 77%-98%, n = 1002). Subgroup analyses showed a 96% success rate (95% CI 73%-100%, n = 60) for awake intubations and 88% (95% CI 69%-98%, n = 942) for asleep intubations. Further refined analyses showed uncomplicated intubation rates of 98% (95% CI 93%-100%, n = 469) for asleep, and 92% (95% CI 78%-99%, n = 48) for awake groups.Conclusions and RelevanceThe risk of failed intubation in patients with mediastinal goiters remains low, and awake intubation may require more attempts than asleep intubation. Further research with standardized definitions of intubation difficulty is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"54 ","pages":"19160216251333352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216251333352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceMediastinal goiters can complicate anesthetic management, and although awake bronchoscopic intubation is the gold standard, it is resource-intensive and may be unpleasant for patients. In many centers across North America, patients undergoing thyroidectomy for mediastinal goiters are routinely intubated awake.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of intubation in patients selected for awake versus asleep intubation for thyroidectomy of mediastinal goiters.DesignPRISMA 2020 Checklist for systematic reviews was followed. A search was performed in the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Two independent reviewers performed abstract and full-text review. Data were extracted in duplicate. Study quality was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tool. To account for heterogeneity, a 3-level random-effects model was constructed using the Der Simonian and Laird method with an arcsine transformation.Setting and ParticipantsPatients undergoing thyroidectomy for benign mediastinal goiters.Intervention and ExposuresAwake or asleep intubation.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Rate of failed intubations in asleep intubation and proportion of uncomplicated intubations in asleep and awake populations.ResultsTwelve of 490 identified studies, involving 1002 patients, were included. Three cases of failed intubations were found in the asleep intubation group, with an overall incidence of failed intubation of 0.3%. Meta-analysis demonstrated an overall uncomplicated intubation rate of 91% (95% CI 77%-98%, n = 1002). Subgroup analyses showed a 96% success rate (95% CI 73%-100%, n = 60) for awake intubations and 88% (95% CI 69%-98%, n = 942) for asleep intubations. Further refined analyses showed uncomplicated intubation rates of 98% (95% CI 93%-100%, n = 469) for asleep, and 92% (95% CI 78%-99%, n = 48) for awake groups.Conclusions and RelevanceThe risk of failed intubation in patients with mediastinal goiters remains low, and awake intubation may require more attempts than asleep intubation. Further research with standardized definitions of intubation difficulty is needed.

清醒与睡眠插管治疗纵隔甲状腺肿:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
重要意义纵隔甲状腺肿大会使麻醉管理复杂化,尽管清醒支气管镜插管是金标准,但它是资源密集型的,可能对患者不愉快。在北美的许多中心,因纵隔甲状腺肿大而接受甲状腺切除术的患者通常是清醒插管。目的评价在纵隔甲状腺切除术中选择清醒插管与睡眠插管的患者的预后。遵循DesignPRISMA 2020系统评审清单。在Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus和Cochrane数据库中进行了搜索。两名独立审稿人分别进行摘要和全文审稿。资料一式两份提取。使用JBI关键评估工具评估研究质量。为了考虑异质性,采用反正弦变换的Der Simonian和Laird方法构建了一个三水平随机效应模型。背景和参与者:良性纵隔甲状腺肿大患者行甲状腺切除术。干预和暴露:清醒或睡眠插管。主要结局和措施睡眠和清醒人群插管失败率和无并发症插管比例。结果490项确定的研究中有12项纳入,涉及1002例患者。睡眠插管组插管失败3例,总插管失败发生率为0.3%。meta分析显示总体无并发症插管率为91% (95% CI 77%-98%, n = 1002)。亚组分析显示,清醒插管成功率为96% (95% CI 73%-100%, n = 60),睡眠插管成功率为88% (95% CI 69%-98%, n = 942)。进一步精细化分析显示,睡眠组无并发症插管率为98% (95% CI 93%-100%, n = 469),清醒组为92% (95% CI 78%-99%, n = 48)。结论及相关性纵隔甲状腺肿患者插管失败的风险仍然很低,清醒插管可能比睡眠插管需要更多的尝试。需要进一步研究插管困难的标准化定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信