Fully Closed-Loop Improves Glycemic Control Compared with Pump with CGM in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes and HbA1c Above Target: A Two-Center, Randomized Crossover Study.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1089/dia.2025.0062
Nithya Kadiyala, Rama Lakshman, Janet Allen, Julia Ware, Charlotte K Boughton, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Ajay Thankamony, Sara Hartnell, Hood Thabit, Ruben H Willemsen, Pratik Shah, Roman Hovorka
{"title":"Fully Closed-Loop Improves Glycemic Control Compared with Pump with CGM in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes and HbA1c Above Target: A Two-Center, Randomized Crossover Study.","authors":"Nithya Kadiyala, Rama Lakshman, Janet Allen, Julia Ware, Charlotte K Boughton, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Ajay Thankamony, Sara Hartnell, Hood Thabit, Ruben H Willemsen, Pratik Shah, Roman Hovorka","doi":"10.1089/dia.2025.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) can struggle to reach recommended HbA1c targets more than other age groups. The safety and efficacy of fully closed-loop (FCL) insulin delivery, which does not require mealtime bolusing, have not been assessed in this cohort. We evaluated the use of FCL with faster insulin aspart (Fiasp) in adolescents with T1D whose HbA1c was above recommended targets. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> This two-center, randomized, crossover study included 24 adolescents (13-19 years) using insulin pump therapy with above-target HbA1c (mean age 16.2 years, median HbA1c 74 mmol/mol [8.9%]). Participants underwent two 8-week periods of unrestricted living, comparing FCL (CamAPS HX) with Fiasp, with standard nonautomated insulin pump therapy with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), in random order. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In an intention-to-treat analysis, the percentage of time glucose was in target range (primary endpoint 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) was higher during FCL than during pump with CGM use (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) 45.2% ± 7.2% vs. 32.3% ± 12.8%, mean difference 12.9 percentage points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5 to 17.3, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Time spent in hyperglycemia >13.9 mmol/L and mean glucose were lower with FCL compared with pump with CGM (median time >13.9 mmol/L 28.7% vs. 39.6%, difference -7.3 percentage points, 95% CI -11.1 to -3.5, <i>P</i> < 0.001; mean glucose 11.1 mmol/L vs. 12.7 mmol/L, difference -1.2 mmol/L, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.5, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Proportion of time with glucose <3.9 mmol/L was similar between interventions (median: FCL 2.78% vs. pump with CGM 2.97%, difference -0.34 percentage points, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.35, <i>P</i> = 0.322). There was no difference in HbA1c after FCL compared with pump with CGM (median: 71 mmol/mol (8.6%) vs. 74 mmol/mol (8.9%), <i>P</i> = 0.227). There was no difference in total daily insulin dose (<i>P</i> = 0.276). No severe hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis occurred. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> FCL insulin delivery with CamAPS HX improved glucose outcomes compared with insulin pump therapy with CGM in adolescents with T1D and HbA1c above target.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"719-727"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) can struggle to reach recommended HbA1c targets more than other age groups. The safety and efficacy of fully closed-loop (FCL) insulin delivery, which does not require mealtime bolusing, have not been assessed in this cohort. We evaluated the use of FCL with faster insulin aspart (Fiasp) in adolescents with T1D whose HbA1c was above recommended targets. Materials and Methods: This two-center, randomized, crossover study included 24 adolescents (13-19 years) using insulin pump therapy with above-target HbA1c (mean age 16.2 years, median HbA1c 74 mmol/mol [8.9%]). Participants underwent two 8-week periods of unrestricted living, comparing FCL (CamAPS HX) with Fiasp, with standard nonautomated insulin pump therapy with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), in random order. Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, the percentage of time glucose was in target range (primary endpoint 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) was higher during FCL than during pump with CGM use (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) 45.2% ± 7.2% vs. 32.3% ± 12.8%, mean difference 12.9 percentage points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5 to 17.3, P < 0.001). Time spent in hyperglycemia >13.9 mmol/L and mean glucose were lower with FCL compared with pump with CGM (median time >13.9 mmol/L 28.7% vs. 39.6%, difference -7.3 percentage points, 95% CI -11.1 to -3.5, P < 0.001; mean glucose 11.1 mmol/L vs. 12.7 mmol/L, difference -1.2 mmol/L, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.5, P < 0.001). Proportion of time with glucose <3.9 mmol/L was similar between interventions (median: FCL 2.78% vs. pump with CGM 2.97%, difference -0.34 percentage points, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.35, P = 0.322). There was no difference in HbA1c after FCL compared with pump with CGM (median: 71 mmol/mol (8.6%) vs. 74 mmol/mol (8.9%), P = 0.227). There was no difference in total daily insulin dose (P = 0.276). No severe hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis occurred. Conclusions: FCL insulin delivery with CamAPS HX improved glucose outcomes compared with insulin pump therapy with CGM in adolescents with T1D and HbA1c above target.

与泵加CGM相比,全闭环改善了HbA1c高于目标的1型糖尿病青少年的血糖控制:一项双中心随机交叉研究
与其他年龄组相比,患有1型糖尿病(T1D)的青少年更难以达到推荐的HbA1c目标。全闭环(FCL)胰岛素递送的安全性和有效性,不需要在用餐时给药,尚未在该队列中进行评估。我们评估了在HbA1c高于推荐目标的青少年T1D患者中使用FCL联合快速胰岛素分离(Fiasp)的情况。材料和方法:这项双中心、随机、交叉研究纳入了24名接受胰岛素泵治疗的青少年(13-19岁),他们的HbA1c高于目标(平均年龄16.2岁,中位HbA1c为74 mmol/mol[8.9%])。参与者接受了两个8周的无限制生活期,以随机顺序比较FCL (CamAPS HX)与Fiasp,以及标准的非自动化胰岛素泵治疗与连续血糖监测(CGM)。结果:在意向治疗分析中,FCL期间血糖在目标范围内的时间百分比(主要终点3.9-10.0 mmol/L)高于使用CGM的泵组(平均±标准差[SD]) 45.2%±7.2%比32.3%±12.8%,平均差异12.9个百分点,95%可信区间[CI] 8.5 ~ 17.3, P < 0.001)。与泵加CGM相比,FCL组高血糖时间>13.9 mmol/L和平均葡萄糖较低(中位时间>13.9 mmol/L 28.7% vs 39.6%,差异-7.3个百分点,95% CI -11.1 ~ -3.5, P < 0.001;平均葡萄糖11.1 mmol/L vs. 12.7 mmol/L,差异-1.2 mmol/L, 95% CI -1.8 ~ -0.5, P < 0.001)。葡萄糖时间比例P = 0.322)。与泵加CGM相比,FCL术后HbA1c无差异(中位数:71 mmol/mol (8.6%) vs. 74 mmol/mol (8.9%), P = 0.227)。两组每日胰岛素总剂量无差异(P = 0.276)。未发生严重低血糖或酮症酸中毒。结论:与胰岛素泵治疗合并CGM的T1D和HbA1c高于目标的青少年相比,CamAPS HX的FCL胰岛素输送改善了血糖结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信