Protocol for implementation of intraoperative adverse event recording during WHO checklist sign-out.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katrin Burri-Winkler, Anne C Auderset, Dieter Hahnloser, Christoph S Burkhart, Valentin Neuhaus, Jörn-Markus Gass, Andreas P Vogt, Giorgio Prouse, Judith Winkens, Guy Haller, Amanda Van Vegten, Zuzanna Kita, Monika Finsterwald, Christian Schindler, Nico Streit, Lisa M Willms, Luzius A Steiner, Lauren Clack, Salome Dell-Kuster
{"title":"Protocol for implementation of intraoperative adverse event recording during WHO checklist sign-out.","authors":"Katrin Burri-Winkler, Anne C Auderset, Dieter Hahnloser, Christoph S Burkhart, Valentin Neuhaus, Jörn-Markus Gass, Andreas P Vogt, Giorgio Prouse, Judith Winkens, Guy Haller, Amanda Van Vegten, Zuzanna Kita, Monika Finsterwald, Christian Schindler, Nico Streit, Lisa M Willms, Luzius A Steiner, Lauren Clack, Salome Dell-Kuster","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction & aim: </strong>Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) increase postoperative complications, which are devastating to patients and costly to healthcare systems. To optimise patient outcomes, the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) was introduced in 2008, but adherence, especially to its third part (sign-out), is low, and iAEs are currently not routinely assessed. This gap between evidence supporting the use of the WHO SSC, current inconsistent sign-out practice and the lack of standardised reporting of iAEs warrants applying an implementation science approach. Hence, this project aims to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of the sign-out, including systematic recording and discussion of iAEs during the sign-out.</p><p><strong>Methods & analysis: </strong>Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation approach, this prospective before-and-after-cohort project includes five surgical disciplines within nine Swiss hospitals. Following an extensive context analysis, this project is set up in three phases: (1) recruitment of 40 patients per surgical discipline and site (approx. 900 in total) for baseline assessment; (2) implementation based on a multifaceted, tailored implementation strategy (including formation of implementation teams, comprehensive education of healthcare professionals, top-down leadership, regular feedback rounds and tailoring implementation to local needs); and (3) recruitment of 40 patients per discipline to assess the changes after implementation (approx. 900). Implementation (eg, checklist fidelity composed of completion and quality) and effectiveness outcomes (ie, clinical patient outcomes) will be analysed using a mixed regression model.</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusion: </strong>By enhancing adherence to the WHO SSC sign-out, including standardised reporting of iAEs, we expect to further improve perioperative patient outcomes. Based on the context analysis, we will provide a widely applicable implementation plan to support and sustain the required behavioural change, which will support roll-out in further hospitals. Meanwhile, clinical and implementation science expertise is meeting the challenges of the complex environment of perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction & aim: Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) increase postoperative complications, which are devastating to patients and costly to healthcare systems. To optimise patient outcomes, the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) was introduced in 2008, but adherence, especially to its third part (sign-out), is low, and iAEs are currently not routinely assessed. This gap between evidence supporting the use of the WHO SSC, current inconsistent sign-out practice and the lack of standardised reporting of iAEs warrants applying an implementation science approach. Hence, this project aims to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of the sign-out, including systematic recording and discussion of iAEs during the sign-out.

Methods & analysis: Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation approach, this prospective before-and-after-cohort project includes five surgical disciplines within nine Swiss hospitals. Following an extensive context analysis, this project is set up in three phases: (1) recruitment of 40 patients per surgical discipline and site (approx. 900 in total) for baseline assessment; (2) implementation based on a multifaceted, tailored implementation strategy (including formation of implementation teams, comprehensive education of healthcare professionals, top-down leadership, regular feedback rounds and tailoring implementation to local needs); and (3) recruitment of 40 patients per discipline to assess the changes after implementation (approx. 900). Implementation (eg, checklist fidelity composed of completion and quality) and effectiveness outcomes (ie, clinical patient outcomes) will be analysed using a mixed regression model.

Discussion & conclusion: By enhancing adherence to the WHO SSC sign-out, including standardised reporting of iAEs, we expect to further improve perioperative patient outcomes. Based on the context analysis, we will provide a widely applicable implementation plan to support and sustain the required behavioural change, which will support roll-out in further hospitals. Meanwhile, clinical and implementation science expertise is meeting the challenges of the complex environment of perioperative care.

世卫组织核对表签到期间术中不良事件记录实施方案。
简介与目的:术中不良事件(iae)增加了术后并发症,这对患者来说是毁灭性的,对医疗保健系统来说是昂贵的。为了优化患者预后,2008年引入了世卫组织手术安全清单(世卫组织SSC),但依从性,特别是对其第三部分(签到)的依从性很低,并且目前没有常规评估iAEs。支持使用世卫组织SSC的证据、目前不一致的签到做法和缺乏对iAEs的标准化报告之间存在差距,因此有必要采用实施科学方法。因此,本项目旨在同时评估签到的有效性和实施情况,包括签到过程中对iae的系统记录和讨论。方法与分析:采用混合的有效性-实施方法,这个前瞻性的前后队列项目包括瑞士9家医院的5个外科学科。经过广泛的背景分析,该项目分为三个阶段:(1)每个外科学科和部位招募40名患者(约40名)。共900人)进行基线评估;(2)基于多方面、量身定制的实施策略(包括组建实施团队、对医护专业人员进行全面教育、自上而下的领导、定期反馈和根据当地需求量身定制实施);(3)每个学科招募40名患者,评估实施后的变化(约为40名)。900)。实施(例如,由完成度和质量组成的检查表保真度)和有效性结果(即临床患者结果)将使用混合回归模型进行分析。讨论与结论:通过加强对世卫组织SSC签署的遵守,包括iae的标准化报告,我们期望进一步改善围手术期患者的预后。根据背景分析,我们将提供一项广泛适用的实施计划,以支持和维持所需的行为改变,这将支持在更多医院推广。同时,临床和实施科学专业知识正在迎接围手术期护理复杂环境的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信