Absolute blood levels and kinetics of neurofilament light (NFL) chains for neurological prognosis in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Timothée Ayasse, Maxime Touron, Marie-Céline Blanc, Estelle Pruvost-Robieux, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Clara Vigneron, Jean-Paul Mira, Frédéric Pène, Alain Cariou, Sarah Benghanem
{"title":"Absolute blood levels and kinetics of neurofilament light (NFL) chains for neurological prognosis in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.","authors":"Timothée Ayasse, Maxime Touron, Marie-Céline Blanc, Estelle Pruvost-Robieux, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Clara Vigneron, Jean-Paul Mira, Frédéric Pène, Alain Cariou, Sarah Benghanem","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01491-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite current guidelines, the prognosis of comatose patients after cardiac arrest (CA) remains indeterminate in approximately 50% of patients. Neurofilament light (NFL) chain, a biomarker of neuronal injury, appears to be a promising tool with better prognostic value compared to neuron-specific enolase (NSE). However, further studies are required. The objective was to evaluate the prognostic value of absolute blood levels and kinetics of NFL measured at 24, 48 and 72 h after CA to predict outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study conducted at a tertiary CA center conducted between April 2023 and November 2024, including 67 comatose patients after CA with at least one blood NFL measurement. The primary outcome was neurological outcome according to the \"best\" modified Rankin scale (mRS) within 3 months, with a mRS 0-3 defining a good outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 64 years old (IQR [53-75]), and 67% were male. 60% of them had out-of-hospital CA and 42% had an initial shockable rhythm. NFL levels were significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcome compared to those with favorable outcome at each time point (24 h: 256.0 [96.2-441.9] versus 37.9 [17.4-104.5] pg/mL, p < 0.001; 48 h: 1297.7 [137.6-3605.0] versus 36.4 [19.3-174.0] pg/mL, p < 0.001; 72 h: 1591.9 [350.6-4913.5] versus 49.3 [23.2-146.4] pg/mL, p < 0.001). NFL levels at 24 and 48 h showed moderate prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.80 and 0.88, respectively), while NFL at 72 h demonstrated high accuracy (AUC 0.90). For predicting poor outcome, NFL level at 24 h > 250 pg/mL had a specificity of 0.90 [0.75-0.90] and a sensitivity of 0.51 [0.35-0.67]. At 48 h, NFL > 383 pg/mL had a specificity of 0.94 [0.81-1.00] and a sensitivity of 0.66 [0.50-0.81]. At 72 h, NFL > 510 pg/mL presented a specificity of 1.00 [1.00-1.00] and a sensitivity of 0.74 [0.52-0.91]. To predict a good outcome, NFL levels < 82 pg/mL at 24 h, < 307 pg/mL at 48 h and < 459 pg/mL at 72 h after CA were the best compromise between specificity and sensitivity. NFL kinetic was not associated with neurological outcomes (AUC 0.50), whereas NSE kinetic measured between 24 and 72 h showed high prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comatose patients after CA, NFL levels at 24, 48 and 72 h could predict both unfavorable and favorable outcomes. Conversely, only the kinetic of NSE levels between 24 and 72 h after CA was associated with neurological outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01491-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite current guidelines, the prognosis of comatose patients after cardiac arrest (CA) remains indeterminate in approximately 50% of patients. Neurofilament light (NFL) chain, a biomarker of neuronal injury, appears to be a promising tool with better prognostic value compared to neuron-specific enolase (NSE). However, further studies are required. The objective was to evaluate the prognostic value of absolute blood levels and kinetics of NFL measured at 24, 48 and 72 h after CA to predict outcome.

Methods: A prospective study conducted at a tertiary CA center conducted between April 2023 and November 2024, including 67 comatose patients after CA with at least one blood NFL measurement. The primary outcome was neurological outcome according to the "best" modified Rankin scale (mRS) within 3 months, with a mRS 0-3 defining a good outcome.

Results: Participants were 64 years old (IQR [53-75]), and 67% were male. 60% of them had out-of-hospital CA and 42% had an initial shockable rhythm. NFL levels were significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcome compared to those with favorable outcome at each time point (24 h: 256.0 [96.2-441.9] versus 37.9 [17.4-104.5] pg/mL, p < 0.001; 48 h: 1297.7 [137.6-3605.0] versus 36.4 [19.3-174.0] pg/mL, p < 0.001; 72 h: 1591.9 [350.6-4913.5] versus 49.3 [23.2-146.4] pg/mL, p < 0.001). NFL levels at 24 and 48 h showed moderate prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.80 and 0.88, respectively), while NFL at 72 h demonstrated high accuracy (AUC 0.90). For predicting poor outcome, NFL level at 24 h > 250 pg/mL had a specificity of 0.90 [0.75-0.90] and a sensitivity of 0.51 [0.35-0.67]. At 48 h, NFL > 383 pg/mL had a specificity of 0.94 [0.81-1.00] and a sensitivity of 0.66 [0.50-0.81]. At 72 h, NFL > 510 pg/mL presented a specificity of 1.00 [1.00-1.00] and a sensitivity of 0.74 [0.52-0.91]. To predict a good outcome, NFL levels < 82 pg/mL at 24 h, < 307 pg/mL at 48 h and < 459 pg/mL at 72 h after CA were the best compromise between specificity and sensitivity. NFL kinetic was not associated with neurological outcomes (AUC 0.50), whereas NSE kinetic measured between 24 and 72 h showed high prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.92).

Conclusion: In comatose patients after CA, NFL levels at 24, 48 and 72 h could predict both unfavorable and favorable outcomes. Conversely, only the kinetic of NSE levels between 24 and 72 h after CA was associated with neurological outcome.

绝对血液水平和神经丝光链动力学对心脏骤停后昏迷患者神经预后的影响。
导读:尽管有目前的指南,但大约50%的心脏骤停(CA)后昏迷患者的预后仍然不确定。神经丝光(NFL)链是神经元损伤的生物标志物,与神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)相比,它似乎是一种有前景的预测工具。然而,还需要进一步的研究。目的是评估CA后24,48和72小时测量的绝对血液水平和NFL动力学的预后价值,以预测预后。方法:一项于2023年4月至2024年11月在三级CA中心进行的前瞻性研究,包括67例CA后至少有一次血液NFL测量的昏迷患者。主要预后指标为3个月内根据“最佳”改良Rankin量表(mRS)评定的神经学预后,mRS 0-3为良好预后。结果:参与者年龄64岁(IQR[53-75]), 67%为男性。60%的患者有院外心律失常,42%的患者有最初的休克性心律失常。在每个时间点,不良结局患者的NFL水平明显高于良好结局患者(24小时:256.0[96.2-441.9]对37.9 [17.4-104.5]pg/mL, p250 pg/mL的特异性为0.90[0.75-0.90],敏感性为0.51[0.35-0.67]。48 h时,NFL > 383 pg/mL的特异性为0.94[0.81-1.00],敏感性为0.66[0.50-0.81]。72h时,NFL > 510 pg/mL特异性为1.00[1.00-1.00],敏感性为0.74[0.52-0.91]。结论:在CA后昏迷的患者中,24,48和72 h的NFL水平可以预测不利和有利的结果。相反,只有CA后24至72小时内NSE水平的动态与神经预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信