Natalie Cheffer , Elizabeth Barnett , Alexei Bullara
{"title":"Effectiveness of asynchronous motivational interviewing training for pediatric nurse practitioner students: A mixed-methods evaluation","authors":"Natalie Cheffer , Elizabeth Barnett , Alexei Bullara","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Effective patient-provider communication is essential for quality healthcare and to promote positive patient behavior changes. However, many prohibitive factors—such as resource-intensive training methods, logistical challenges of in-person workshops, and limited curricular time—have contributed to the limited inclusion of Motivational Interviewing (MI) training in nursing education. As a patient-centered and evidence-based approach, MI has the potential to enhance communication skills, yet traditional training models often fail to support long-term competency.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This mixed-methods study evaluated an asynchronous, web-based MI training curriculum to determine its effectiveness in improving key MI skills among pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirteen PNP students completed the MI training as part of a seminar and clinical course over a single semester. The curriculum incorporated five deliberate practice exercises focusing on MI techniques such as reflective listening, empathy, and partnership. Pre- and post-training assessments were conducted using mock interviews coded with the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 4.2.1 tool, alongside qualitative analysis of reflective written responses from the students.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Post-training, students demonstrated significant increases in MI-adherent behaviors and global ratings for empathy and partnership, with a marked decrease in MI non-adherent behaviors. Qualitative data supported these findings and revealed that students gained clarity on MI principles and improved their ability to cultivate patient trust and autonomy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The MI training effectively enhanced MI competencies among PNP students and supported its potential as a scalable alternative to traditional, resource-intensive training methods. Future research with larger samples and extended follow-up is warranted to further validate these findings and explore the long-term impact on clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 106790"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725002266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Effective patient-provider communication is essential for quality healthcare and to promote positive patient behavior changes. However, many prohibitive factors—such as resource-intensive training methods, logistical challenges of in-person workshops, and limited curricular time—have contributed to the limited inclusion of Motivational Interviewing (MI) training in nursing education. As a patient-centered and evidence-based approach, MI has the potential to enhance communication skills, yet traditional training models often fail to support long-term competency.
Objective
This mixed-methods study evaluated an asynchronous, web-based MI training curriculum to determine its effectiveness in improving key MI skills among pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) students.
Methods
Thirteen PNP students completed the MI training as part of a seminar and clinical course over a single semester. The curriculum incorporated five deliberate practice exercises focusing on MI techniques such as reflective listening, empathy, and partnership. Pre- and post-training assessments were conducted using mock interviews coded with the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 4.2.1 tool, alongside qualitative analysis of reflective written responses from the students.
Results
Post-training, students demonstrated significant increases in MI-adherent behaviors and global ratings for empathy and partnership, with a marked decrease in MI non-adherent behaviors. Qualitative data supported these findings and revealed that students gained clarity on MI principles and improved their ability to cultivate patient trust and autonomy.
Conclusion
The MI training effectively enhanced MI competencies among PNP students and supported its potential as a scalable alternative to traditional, resource-intensive training methods. Future research with larger samples and extended follow-up is warranted to further validate these findings and explore the long-term impact on clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.