How do different executive function components contribute to children's academic skills?

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Jiao He , Rongke Xu , Yang Yang , Jo Van Hoof , Xiujie Yang
{"title":"How do different executive function components contribute to children's academic skills?","authors":"Jiao He ,&nbsp;Rongke Xu ,&nbsp;Yang Yang ,&nbsp;Jo Van Hoof ,&nbsp;Xiujie Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2025.101589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the extent to which components of executive function (EF)—working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility—accounted for the unique variance in reading ability, arithmetic skills, and word problem solving, while considering the interplay among these academic abilities. While most of the research in this field has been conducted in Western countries, this study extends the literature by focusing on Chinese students. One hundred and eighteen Chinese children completed assessments in working memory (Sequential whack-a-mole task), inhibitory control (Go/No-Go task), cognitive flexibility (Task-switching), reading (reading fluency), and mathematics (numerical operations and word problem solving). The findings, derived from a multivariate multiple regression model, revealed that working memory was a significant predictor of all three academic abilities. Inhibitory control played as a substantial role in predicting reading ability and arithmetic skills. In contrast, cognitive flexibility did not show a significant relationship with any of these academic abilities. The results emphasize that not three components of EF are equally important in explaining variance in these academic skills among Chinese children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201425000486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which components of executive function (EF)—working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility—accounted for the unique variance in reading ability, arithmetic skills, and word problem solving, while considering the interplay among these academic abilities. While most of the research in this field has been conducted in Western countries, this study extends the literature by focusing on Chinese students. One hundred and eighteen Chinese children completed assessments in working memory (Sequential whack-a-mole task), inhibitory control (Go/No-Go task), cognitive flexibility (Task-switching), reading (reading fluency), and mathematics (numerical operations and word problem solving). The findings, derived from a multivariate multiple regression model, revealed that working memory was a significant predictor of all three academic abilities. Inhibitory control played as a substantial role in predicting reading ability and arithmetic skills. In contrast, cognitive flexibility did not show a significant relationship with any of these academic abilities. The results emphasize that not three components of EF are equally important in explaining variance in these academic skills among Chinese children.
不同的执行功能成分如何影响儿童的学业技能?
本研究调查了执行功能(EF)的组成部分——工作记忆、抑制控制和认知灵活性——在多大程度上解释了阅读能力、算术技能和解决文字问题的独特差异,同时考虑了这些学术能力之间的相互作用。虽然这一领域的大多数研究都是在西方国家进行的,但本研究通过关注中国学生来扩展文献。118名中国儿童完成了工作记忆(顺序打地鼠任务)、抑制控制(Go/No-Go任务)、认知灵活性(任务切换)、阅读(阅读流畅性)和数学(数值运算和文字问题解决)的评估。通过多元回归模型得出的研究结果显示,工作记忆是这三种学术能力的重要预测指标。抑制控制在预测阅读能力和算术技能方面发挥了重要作用。相比之下,认知灵活性与这些学术能力没有显著的关系。结果强调,EF的三个组成部分在解释中国儿童在这些学习技能上的差异时并非同等重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信