Head elevating device and cricothyroid membrane position in pregnant women with obesity class 3: an observational study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
F. Zasso , A. Spring , J.F. Casellato , E. Wild , E. You-Ten , J.C.A. Carvalho , J. Morales , K. Downey , X.Y. Ye , N. Siddiqui
{"title":"Head elevating device and cricothyroid membrane position in pregnant women with obesity class 3: an observational study","authors":"F. Zasso ,&nbsp;A. Spring ,&nbsp;J.F. Casellato ,&nbsp;E. Wild ,&nbsp;E. You-Ten ,&nbsp;J.C.A. Carvalho ,&nbsp;J. Morales ,&nbsp;K. Downey ,&nbsp;X.Y. Ye ,&nbsp;N. Siddiqui","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div> <!-->Obesity and pregnancy are risk factors for difficult intubation. A head-elevating positioning device increases functional residual capacity and improves direct laryngoscopy. It is unclear what effect such device has on the airway anatomy. The primary aim of this study was to determine the change in distance from the sternal notch to the cricothyroid membrane (CTM) mid-point among pregnant women with class 3 obesity, comparing the supine positioning and the head-elevated position.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div> <!-->In this prospective observational study, 50 pregnant women with class 3 obesity provided their consent for participation, and airway anatomy was assessed with ultrasound when presenting either for elective cesarean delivery or in early stages of labor. The CTM’s depth and height were measured in supine (Time 1) and head-elevated (Time 2) positions. The CTM midpoint was established and the distance from this point to the sternal notch was obtained. The primary outcome was change in distance from sternal notch to CTM midpoint. Secondary outcomes included changes in CTM depth and height.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median (± standard deviation) sternal notch to CTM midpoint distance increased significantly from 41.07 mm (± 8.35 at Time 1 to 45.40 mm ± 8.97) at Time 2 (mean difference 4.33 mm, 95% CI 3.06 to 5.61, <em>P</em> &lt;0.0001). No differences were observed in CTM depth (mean difference −0.15 mm, <em>P</em> =0.66) or height (mean difference 0.34 mm, <em>P</em> =0.20).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div> <!-->Head elevation increased the distance from the sternal notch to the CTM midpoint but did not affect CTM depth or height in pregnant women with class 3 obesity. Further research is needed to assess neck ultrasound anatomy in high-risk patients for difficult intubation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 104680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25000524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

 Obesity and pregnancy are risk factors for difficult intubation. A head-elevating positioning device increases functional residual capacity and improves direct laryngoscopy. It is unclear what effect such device has on the airway anatomy. The primary aim of this study was to determine the change in distance from the sternal notch to the cricothyroid membrane (CTM) mid-point among pregnant women with class 3 obesity, comparing the supine positioning and the head-elevated position.

Methods

 In this prospective observational study, 50 pregnant women with class 3 obesity provided their consent for participation, and airway anatomy was assessed with ultrasound when presenting either for elective cesarean delivery or in early stages of labor. The CTM’s depth and height were measured in supine (Time 1) and head-elevated (Time 2) positions. The CTM midpoint was established and the distance from this point to the sternal notch was obtained. The primary outcome was change in distance from sternal notch to CTM midpoint. Secondary outcomes included changes in CTM depth and height.

Results

The median (± standard deviation) sternal notch to CTM midpoint distance increased significantly from 41.07 mm (± 8.35 at Time 1 to 45.40 mm ± 8.97) at Time 2 (mean difference 4.33 mm, 95% CI 3.06 to 5.61, P <0.0001). No differences were observed in CTM depth (mean difference −0.15 mm, P =0.66) or height (mean difference 0.34 mm, P =0.20).

Conclusion

 Head elevation increased the distance from the sternal notch to the CTM midpoint but did not affect CTM depth or height in pregnant women with class 3 obesity. Further research is needed to assess neck ultrasound anatomy in high-risk patients for difficult intubation.
3级肥胖孕妇头部抬高装置与环甲膜位置的观察性研究
背景肥胖和妊娠是插管困难的危险因素。头抬高定位装置增加功能性残余容量,改善直接喉镜检查。目前尚不清楚这种装置对气道解剖有什么影响。本研究的主要目的是确定3级肥胖孕妇胸骨切迹到环甲膜(CTM)中点的距离变化,比较仰卧位和高头位。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,50名3级肥胖孕妇同意参与,在选择剖宫产或分娩早期时,用超声对气道解剖进行评估。在仰卧位(时间1)和头抬高位(时间2)时测量CTM的深度和高度。建立CTM中点,并获得该点到胸骨切迹的距离。主要观察指标为胸骨切迹到CTM中点距离的变化。次要结果包括CTM深度和高度的变化。结果胸骨切迹到CTM中点距离的中位数(±标准差)从Time 1时的41.07 mm(±8.35)增加到Time 2时的45.40 mm±8.97(平均差4.33 mm, 95% CI 3.06 ~ 5.61, P <0.0001)。CTM深度(平均差值- 0.15 mm, P =0.66)和高度(平均差值0.34 mm, P =0.20)无差异。结论妊娠3级肥胖患者头部抬高可增加胸骨切迹到CTM中点的距离,但不影响CTM深度和高度。对于插管困难的高危患者,需要进一步的研究来评估颈部超声解剖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信