F. Zasso , A. Spring , J.F. Casellato , E. Wild , E. You-Ten , J.C.A. Carvalho , J. Morales , K. Downey , X.Y. Ye , N. Siddiqui
{"title":"Head elevating device and cricothyroid membrane position in pregnant women with obesity class 3: an observational study","authors":"F. Zasso , A. Spring , J.F. Casellato , E. Wild , E. You-Ten , J.C.A. Carvalho , J. Morales , K. Downey , X.Y. Ye , N. Siddiqui","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div> <!-->Obesity and pregnancy are risk factors for difficult intubation. A head-elevating positioning device increases functional residual capacity and improves direct laryngoscopy. It is unclear what effect such device has on the airway anatomy. The primary aim of this study was to determine the change in distance from the sternal notch to the cricothyroid membrane (CTM) mid-point among pregnant women with class 3 obesity, comparing the supine positioning and the head-elevated position.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div> <!-->In this prospective observational study, 50 pregnant women with class 3 obesity provided their consent for participation, and airway anatomy was assessed with ultrasound when presenting either for elective cesarean delivery or in early stages of labor. The CTM’s depth and height were measured in supine (Time 1) and head-elevated (Time 2) positions. The CTM midpoint was established and the distance from this point to the sternal notch was obtained. The primary outcome was change in distance from sternal notch to CTM midpoint. Secondary outcomes included changes in CTM depth and height.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median (± standard deviation) sternal notch to CTM midpoint distance increased significantly from 41.07 mm (± 8.35 at Time 1 to 45.40 mm ± 8.97) at Time 2 (mean difference 4.33 mm, 95% CI 3.06 to 5.61, <em>P</em> <0.0001). No differences were observed in CTM depth (mean difference −0.15 mm, <em>P</em> =0.66) or height (mean difference 0.34 mm, <em>P</em> =0.20).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div> <!-->Head elevation increased the distance from the sternal notch to the CTM midpoint but did not affect CTM depth or height in pregnant women with class 3 obesity. Further research is needed to assess neck ultrasound anatomy in high-risk patients for difficult intubation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 104680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25000524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Obesity and pregnancy are risk factors for difficult intubation. A head-elevating positioning device increases functional residual capacity and improves direct laryngoscopy. It is unclear what effect such device has on the airway anatomy. The primary aim of this study was to determine the change in distance from the sternal notch to the cricothyroid membrane (CTM) mid-point among pregnant women with class 3 obesity, comparing the supine positioning and the head-elevated position.
Methods
In this prospective observational study, 50 pregnant women with class 3 obesity provided their consent for participation, and airway anatomy was assessed with ultrasound when presenting either for elective cesarean delivery or in early stages of labor. The CTM’s depth and height were measured in supine (Time 1) and head-elevated (Time 2) positions. The CTM midpoint was established and the distance from this point to the sternal notch was obtained. The primary outcome was change in distance from sternal notch to CTM midpoint. Secondary outcomes included changes in CTM depth and height.
Results
The median (± standard deviation) sternal notch to CTM midpoint distance increased significantly from 41.07 mm (± 8.35 at Time 1 to 45.40 mm ± 8.97) at Time 2 (mean difference 4.33 mm, 95% CI 3.06 to 5.61, P <0.0001). No differences were observed in CTM depth (mean difference −0.15 mm, P =0.66) or height (mean difference 0.34 mm, P =0.20).
Conclusion
Head elevation increased the distance from the sternal notch to the CTM midpoint but did not affect CTM depth or height in pregnant women with class 3 obesity. Further research is needed to assess neck ultrasound anatomy in high-risk patients for difficult intubation.
背景肥胖和妊娠是插管困难的危险因素。头抬高定位装置增加功能性残余容量,改善直接喉镜检查。目前尚不清楚这种装置对气道解剖有什么影响。本研究的主要目的是确定3级肥胖孕妇胸骨切迹到环甲膜(CTM)中点的距离变化,比较仰卧位和高头位。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,50名3级肥胖孕妇同意参与,在选择剖宫产或分娩早期时,用超声对气道解剖进行评估。在仰卧位(时间1)和头抬高位(时间2)时测量CTM的深度和高度。建立CTM中点,并获得该点到胸骨切迹的距离。主要观察指标为胸骨切迹到CTM中点距离的变化。次要结果包括CTM深度和高度的变化。结果胸骨切迹到CTM中点距离的中位数(±标准差)从Time 1时的41.07 mm(±8.35)增加到Time 2时的45.40 mm±8.97(平均差4.33 mm, 95% CI 3.06 ~ 5.61, P <0.0001)。CTM深度(平均差值- 0.15 mm, P =0.66)和高度(平均差值0.34 mm, P =0.20)无差异。结论妊娠3级肥胖患者头部抬高可增加胸骨切迹到CTM中点的距离,但不影响CTM深度和高度。对于插管困难的高危患者,需要进一步的研究来评估颈部超声解剖。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.