Intraoperative fentanyl versus paracetamol for ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval analgesia: a randomised clinical trial

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
E. Farladansky , B. Cohen , B. Almog , C. Weiniger , S. Hazan , L. Barzilay , S. Haim
{"title":"Intraoperative fentanyl versus paracetamol for ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval analgesia: a randomised clinical trial","authors":"E. Farladansky ,&nbsp;B. Cohen ,&nbsp;B. Almog ,&nbsp;C. Weiniger ,&nbsp;S. Hazan ,&nbsp;L. Barzilay ,&nbsp;S. Haim","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite its brief duration, transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval is a potentially painful procedure often managed with opioid-based sedation. This study evaluated whether intravenous paracetamol could provide postoperative analgesia comparable to fentanyl.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We investigated two multimodal anaesthesia regimens, one including intravenous (IV) paracetamol and the other IV fentanyl, for postoperative analgesia in a single-center, single-blinded, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Healthy women with ≤15 follicles identified by ultrasound undergoing oocyte retrieval under general anaesthesia (propofol) were randomised to receive IV paracetamol 1000 mg vs IV fentanyl 100 μg. The primary outcome was median postoperative pain on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) scores (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) at five predefined time points within the first two postoperative hours. Secondary outcome measures included sedation scale (Pasero), Aldrete scale, discharge time, patient satisfaction with anaesthesia (5-point Likert scale), administration of supplemental analgesia and antiemetics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 100 patients were enrolled with 95 cases analysed. Median [IQR] NRS scores were 0 [0–1] in the paracetamol group and 0 [0–1] in the fentanyl group (<em>P</em> =0.31), indicating non-inferiority. There were no differences between groups in the rate of low Pasero score (84% with paracetamol vs 87% with fentanyl, <em>P</em> =0.98), Aldrete scores, use of postoperative analgesia, prolonged discharge time (&gt;60 minutes) or satisfaction scores (median 5 in both groups, <em>P</em> =0.90).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Intra-operative IV paracetamol 1000 mg was non-inferior to fentanyl 100 μg for post-procedure analgesia, suggesting opioid-free anaesthesia may be an acceptable approach for ≤15 follicles ultrasound-guided oocyte retrievals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 104681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25000536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite its brief duration, transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval is a potentially painful procedure often managed with opioid-based sedation. This study evaluated whether intravenous paracetamol could provide postoperative analgesia comparable to fentanyl.

Methods

We investigated two multimodal anaesthesia regimens, one including intravenous (IV) paracetamol and the other IV fentanyl, for postoperative analgesia in a single-center, single-blinded, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Healthy women with ≤15 follicles identified by ultrasound undergoing oocyte retrieval under general anaesthesia (propofol) were randomised to receive IV paracetamol 1000 mg vs IV fentanyl 100 μg. The primary outcome was median postoperative pain on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) scores (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) at five predefined time points within the first two postoperative hours. Secondary outcome measures included sedation scale (Pasero), Aldrete scale, discharge time, patient satisfaction with anaesthesia (5-point Likert scale), administration of supplemental analgesia and antiemetics.

Results

In total, 100 patients were enrolled with 95 cases analysed. Median [IQR] NRS scores were 0 [0–1] in the paracetamol group and 0 [0–1] in the fentanyl group (P =0.31), indicating non-inferiority. There were no differences between groups in the rate of low Pasero score (84% with paracetamol vs 87% with fentanyl, P =0.98), Aldrete scores, use of postoperative analgesia, prolonged discharge time (>60 minutes) or satisfaction scores (median 5 in both groups, P =0.90).

Conclusion

Intra-operative IV paracetamol 1000 mg was non-inferior to fentanyl 100 μg for post-procedure analgesia, suggesting opioid-free anaesthesia may be an acceptable approach for ≤15 follicles ultrasound-guided oocyte retrievals.
术中芬太尼与对乙酰氨基酚超声引导下卵母细胞回收镇痛:一项随机临床试验
背景:尽管持续时间短,经阴道超声引导的卵母细胞提取是一个潜在的痛苦过程,通常使用阿片类药物镇静。本研究评估静脉注射扑热息痛是否能提供与芬太尼相当的术后镇痛。方法:在一项单中心、单盲、随机、非劣效性试验中,我们研究了两种多模式麻醉方案,一种包括静脉(IV)扑热息痛和另一种静脉(IV)芬太尼,用于术后镇痛。在全身麻醉(异丙酚)下,超声检查发现卵泡≤15个的健康女性接受卵母细胞提取,随机分为静脉注射扑热息痛1000 mg和静脉注射芬太尼100 μg。主要终点是术后2小时内5个预定时间点的11分数值评定量表(NRS)中位术后疼痛(0 =无疼痛,10 =可想象的最严重疼痛)。次要指标包括镇静量表(Pasero)、Aldrete量表、出院时间、患者对麻醉的满意度(5分Likert量表)、补充镇痛药和止吐药的使用。结果共纳入100例患者,分析95例。对乙酰氨基酚组[IQR] NRS评分中位数为0[0 - 1],芬太尼组为0 [0 - 1],P =0.31,无劣效性。两组间Pasero评分低的比率(对乙酰氨基酚组为84%,芬太尼组为87%,P =0.98)、Aldrete评分、术后镇痛使用、延长出院时间(60分钟)或满意度评分(两组中位数为5,P =0.90)均无差异。结论术中静脉滴注扑热息痛1000 mg的术后镇痛效果不低于芬太尼100 μg,提示超声引导下≤15个卵泡卵母细胞提取时,无阿片类麻醉可能是一种可接受的麻醉方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信