The impact of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on the weaning success rate of tracheostomized patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation: a pilot and feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial

Cristiane Bastos Netto , Maycon Moura Reboredo , Rodrigo Souza Vieira , Lídia Maria Carneiro da Fonseca , Elivaldo Cyrillo Júnior , André Luís Dias de Souza , Erich Vidal Carvalho , Bruno Valle Pinheiro
{"title":"The impact of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on the weaning success rate of tracheostomized patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation: a pilot and feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Cristiane Bastos Netto ,&nbsp;Maycon Moura Reboredo ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Souza Vieira ,&nbsp;Lídia Maria Carneiro da Fonseca ,&nbsp;Elivaldo Cyrillo Júnior ,&nbsp;André Luís Dias de Souza ,&nbsp;Erich Vidal Carvalho ,&nbsp;Bruno Valle Pinheiro","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.502125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility of adding mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) to a weaning protocol for tracheostomized patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Single-center, open-label, randomized, controlled pilot and feasibility study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Intensive care unit in Brazil.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>Tracheostomized adults who were invasively ventilated for more than 14 days and who were weaned from MV.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Patients were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). During weaning with a tracheostomy collar, the IG received two daily sessions of MI-E, each with 5 cycles (insufflation and exsufflation pressures of 45 cm H<sub>2</sub>O). The CG received conventional chest physiotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>The primary outcomes were the feasibility of adding MI-E to the weaning protocol and the rate of successful weaning.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 47 patients were randomized, with 25 in the IG and 22 in the CG. All patients randomized to the MI-E group received the proposed protocol, completing all the scheduled MI-E sessions. Adverse events occurred in 14% of the MI-E sessions, but they did not lead to treatment interruption. Weaning success was observed in 76% of IG patients and 73% of CG patients (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.75–1.46). No significant differences were observed between the IG and CG regarding ICU mortality (16% and 18%, respectively, p = 0.99) or hospital mortality (40% and 41%, respectively, p = 0.99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of MI-E to the standard weaning protocol is feasible, but not result in a greater rate of successful weaning in tracheostomized patients.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration number</h3><div>U1111-1302-9035.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"49 6","pages":"Article 502125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724003394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of adding mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) to a weaning protocol for tracheostomized patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV).

Design

Single-center, open-label, randomized, controlled pilot and feasibility study.

Setting

Intensive care unit in Brazil.

Patients

Tracheostomized adults who were invasively ventilated for more than 14 days and who were weaned from MV.

Interventions

Patients were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). During weaning with a tracheostomy collar, the IG received two daily sessions of MI-E, each with 5 cycles (insufflation and exsufflation pressures of 45 cm H2O). The CG received conventional chest physiotherapy.

Main variables of interest

The primary outcomes were the feasibility of adding MI-E to the weaning protocol and the rate of successful weaning.

Results

A total of 47 patients were randomized, with 25 in the IG and 22 in the CG. All patients randomized to the MI-E group received the proposed protocol, completing all the scheduled MI-E sessions. Adverse events occurred in 14% of the MI-E sessions, but they did not lead to treatment interruption. Weaning success was observed in 76% of IG patients and 73% of CG patients (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.75–1.46). No significant differences were observed between the IG and CG regarding ICU mortality (16% and 18%, respectively, p = 0.99) or hospital mortality (40% and 41%, respectively, p = 0.99).

Conclusions

The addition of MI-E to the standard weaning protocol is feasible, but not result in a greater rate of successful weaning in tracheostomized patients.

Clinical trial registration number

U1111-1302-9035.
机械充气-呼气对气管造口术患者延长机械通气脱机成功率的影响:一项随机对照试验的先导性和可行性研究
目的探讨气管造口术后延长机械通气(MV)患者在脱机方案中加入机械充气-呼气(MI-E)的可行性。设计单中心、开放标签、随机对照试验和可行性研究。巴西的重症监护病房。患者:有创通气超过14天并脱离MV的成人组。患者被随机分为两组:干预组(IG)和对照组(CG)。在气管造口项圈脱机期间,IG每天接受两次MI-E,每次5个周期(充气和呼气压力为45 cm H2O)。对照组给予常规胸部物理治疗。主要结果为在断奶方案中加入MI-E的可行性和断奶成功率。结果随机分组47例,IG组25例,CG组22例。所有随机分配到MI-E组的患者都接受了建议的方案,完成了所有预定的MI-E疗程。不良事件发生在14%的MI-E疗程中,但它们没有导致治疗中断。76%的IG患者和73%的CG患者成功断奶(相对风险,1.05;95% ci, 0.75-1.46)。IG组和CG组在ICU死亡率(分别为16%和18%,p = 0.99)和住院死亡率(分别为40%和41%,p = 0.99)方面无显著差异。结论在标准脱机方案中加入MI-E是可行的,但不能提高气管造口患者的脱机成功率。临床试验注册号:u1111 -1302-9035。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信