Social-emotional standards for secondary students in the United States: A systematic review and synthesis

Christi Bergin , Nicole Brass , Lindsay Brockmeier , Alice Hung , Riley Rohler
{"title":"Social-emotional standards for secondary students in the United States: A systematic review and synthesis","authors":"Christi Bergin ,&nbsp;Nicole Brass ,&nbsp;Lindsay Brockmeier ,&nbsp;Alice Hung ,&nbsp;Riley Rohler","doi":"10.1016/j.sel.2025.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social-emotional (SE) standards have garnered substantial attention recently, both among the research community and in public policy forums. While state-level standards in early childhood and elementary schools have been common for over a decade, standards in secondary schools have only recently emerged in some states. In phase one, we conducted a systematic review of existing state standards in the United States for secondary schools in 2022. This review included an examination of standalone SE standards and those embedded in the state’s gifted, vocational, health, physical education, and counseling standards. For each state’s standards, we identified grade level and foundational frameworks. We found that 24 states had standalone s tandards for secondary students, and 20 states had standards applicable to secondary students embedded within health, physical, gifted, career technical education, or counseling curriculum. We identified 2200 state SE standards for secondary students. In phase two, we synthesized this unwieldly list to 11 SE competencies supported by developmental science, and prioritized in the American School Counselor Association standards, Common Career Technical Core Standards, and adaptive functioning indicators in the APA’s DSM-5. Implications for practice and research are discussed regarding the development of SE standards for secondary students</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101165,"journal":{"name":"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773233925000440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social-emotional (SE) standards have garnered substantial attention recently, both among the research community and in public policy forums. While state-level standards in early childhood and elementary schools have been common for over a decade, standards in secondary schools have only recently emerged in some states. In phase one, we conducted a systematic review of existing state standards in the United States for secondary schools in 2022. This review included an examination of standalone SE standards and those embedded in the state’s gifted, vocational, health, physical education, and counseling standards. For each state’s standards, we identified grade level and foundational frameworks. We found that 24 states had standalone s tandards for secondary students, and 20 states had standards applicable to secondary students embedded within health, physical, gifted, career technical education, or counseling curriculum. We identified 2200 state SE standards for secondary students. In phase two, we synthesized this unwieldly list to 11 SE competencies supported by developmental science, and prioritized in the American School Counselor Association standards, Common Career Technical Core Standards, and adaptive functioning indicators in the APA’s DSM-5. Implications for practice and research are discussed regarding the development of SE standards for secondary students
美国中学生社会情感标准:系统回顾与综合
最近,社会情感(SE)标准在研究界和公共政策论坛上都引起了极大的关注。虽然幼儿和小学的州级标准已经普遍存在了十多年,但在一些州,中学的标准只是最近才出现。在第一阶段,我们在2022年对美国现有的中学州标准进行了系统的审查。这项审查包括对独立的SE标准和嵌入国家天赋标准、职业标准、健康标准、体育标准和咨询标准的检查。对于每个州的标准,我们确定了年级水平和基础框架。我们发现,24个州对中学生制定了独立的标准,20个州将适用于中学生的标准纳入了健康、体育、天赋、职业技术教育或咨询课程。我们为中学生确定了2200个国家SE标准。在第二阶段,我们在发展科学的支持下,将这个难以处理的列表合成为11个SE能力,并在美国学校咨询师协会标准、公共职业技术核心标准和APA的DSM-5中的适应性功能指标中进行优先排序。本文讨论了中学学生英语标准制定对实践和研究的启示
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信