Mimansa Sinha , Sanchita Paul , Mili Ghosh Nee Lala
{"title":"Comparative analysis of mask R-CNN and U-Net architectures using ResNet as backbone for lunar crater detection","authors":"Mimansa Sinha , Sanchita Paul , Mili Ghosh Nee Lala","doi":"10.1016/j.pss.2025.106140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automated detection of lunar craters is crucial for advancing planetary science, enabling efficient geological mapping, surface age estimation, and resource identification. This study compares Mask R-CNN (instance segmentation) and U-Net (semantic segmentation) architectures using ResNet as the backbone for lunar crater detection. Key novelty is comparing model performance in both a Geospatial context (ArcGIS Pro environment) and non-Geospatial environment a method not heretofore attempted. Training and validation were conducted using Geocoded Chandrayaan-2 TMC-2 DEM data, employing a new strategy that facilitates accurate localization and precise detection of small, morphologically complex craters. Mask R-CNN achieved a precision of 91 %, a recall of 85 %, and an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 87 %, excelling in detecting intricate crater edges and identifying crater diameters with accurate geolocation information. However, it struggled to detect craters with less depth or degraded rims. Conversely, U-Net demonstrated superior recall (93 %) but moderate precision (85 %), making it efficient for broader crater localization tasks. U-Net excelled at identifying perfectly shaped craters but faced challenges in detecting larger and very small craters. Mask R-CNN identified previously uncatalogued craters, particularly those smaller than 1 km in diameter, while U-Net excelled at detecting a greater number of overlapping and nested craters, showcasing their complementary strengths. These findings underscore the potential of deep learning to enhance lunar research and future planetary exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20054,"journal":{"name":"Planetary and Space Science","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 106140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planetary and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063325001072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Automated detection of lunar craters is crucial for advancing planetary science, enabling efficient geological mapping, surface age estimation, and resource identification. This study compares Mask R-CNN (instance segmentation) and U-Net (semantic segmentation) architectures using ResNet as the backbone for lunar crater detection. Key novelty is comparing model performance in both a Geospatial context (ArcGIS Pro environment) and non-Geospatial environment a method not heretofore attempted. Training and validation were conducted using Geocoded Chandrayaan-2 TMC-2 DEM data, employing a new strategy that facilitates accurate localization and precise detection of small, morphologically complex craters. Mask R-CNN achieved a precision of 91 %, a recall of 85 %, and an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 87 %, excelling in detecting intricate crater edges and identifying crater diameters with accurate geolocation information. However, it struggled to detect craters with less depth or degraded rims. Conversely, U-Net demonstrated superior recall (93 %) but moderate precision (85 %), making it efficient for broader crater localization tasks. U-Net excelled at identifying perfectly shaped craters but faced challenges in detecting larger and very small craters. Mask R-CNN identified previously uncatalogued craters, particularly those smaller than 1 km in diameter, while U-Net excelled at detecting a greater number of overlapping and nested craters, showcasing their complementary strengths. These findings underscore the potential of deep learning to enhance lunar research and future planetary exploration.
期刊介绍:
Planetary and Space Science publishes original articles as well as short communications (letters). Ground-based and space-borne instrumentation and laboratory simulation of solar system processes are included. The following fields of planetary and solar system research are covered:
• Celestial mechanics, including dynamical evolution of the solar system, gravitational captures and resonances, relativistic effects, tracking and dynamics
• Cosmochemistry and origin, including all aspects of the formation and initial physical and chemical evolution of the solar system
• Terrestrial planets and satellites, including the physics of the interiors, geology and morphology of the surfaces, tectonics, mineralogy and dating
• Outer planets and satellites, including formation and evolution, remote sensing at all wavelengths and in situ measurements
• Planetary atmospheres, including formation and evolution, circulation and meteorology, boundary layers, remote sensing and laboratory simulation
• Planetary magnetospheres and ionospheres, including origin of magnetic fields, magnetospheric plasma and radiation belts, and their interaction with the sun, the solar wind and satellites
• Small bodies, dust and rings, including asteroids, comets and zodiacal light and their interaction with the solar radiation and the solar wind
• Exobiology, including origin of life, detection of planetary ecosystems and pre-biological phenomena in the solar system and laboratory simulations
• Extrasolar systems, including the detection and/or the detectability of exoplanets and planetary systems, their formation and evolution, the physical and chemical properties of the exoplanets
• History of planetary and space research