REGISTRATION OF ORTHODONTIC DIGITAL MODELS.

Craniofacial growth series Pub Date : 2011-01-01
Dan Grauer, Lucia H Cevidanes, Donald Tyndall, Martin A Styner, Patrick M Flood, William R Proffit
{"title":"REGISTRATION OF ORTHODONTIC DIGITAL MODELS.","authors":"Dan Grauer, Lucia H Cevidanes, Donald Tyndall, Martin A Styner, Patrick M Flood, William R Proffit","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current methods to assess outcomes and change in orthodontics are comparison of photographs, cephalometric measurements and superimpositions, and comparisons/measurements on dental casts. Digital models are a relatively new records modality in orthodontics. They offer numerous advantages in terms of storage space, spatial registration and superimposition. The purpose of this chapter is to determine the reproducibility of: 1) establishing occlusion of independently scanned digital models; and 2) registering digital models obtained after treatment on their homologous digital model setups produced before treatment. Reliability of both procedures was assessed with two random samples of five patient's models. In both experiments, three replicate positionings of the models per patient were created and variability in position was evaluated by the maximum surface difference between replicates, and the standard deviation of the surface distances between replicates respectively. Based on the data obtained, we concluded that it is reliable to register independently scanned models to a scanned surface of the models in occlusion. Surface-to-surface registration of final orthodontic digital models to planned setup models also is reproducible.</p>","PeriodicalId":91238,"journal":{"name":"Craniofacial growth series","volume":"48 ","pages":"377-391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniofacial growth series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current methods to assess outcomes and change in orthodontics are comparison of photographs, cephalometric measurements and superimpositions, and comparisons/measurements on dental casts. Digital models are a relatively new records modality in orthodontics. They offer numerous advantages in terms of storage space, spatial registration and superimposition. The purpose of this chapter is to determine the reproducibility of: 1) establishing occlusion of independently scanned digital models; and 2) registering digital models obtained after treatment on their homologous digital model setups produced before treatment. Reliability of both procedures was assessed with two random samples of five patient's models. In both experiments, three replicate positionings of the models per patient were created and variability in position was evaluated by the maximum surface difference between replicates, and the standard deviation of the surface distances between replicates respectively. Based on the data obtained, we concluded that it is reliable to register independently scanned models to a scanned surface of the models in occlusion. Surface-to-surface registration of final orthodontic digital models to planned setup models also is reproducible.

正畸数字模型注册。
目前评估正畸疗效和变化的方法是比较照片、头侧测量和叠加,以及比较/测量牙模。数字模型是一种相对较新的正畸记录方式。它们在存储空间、空间配准和叠加方面具有许多优点。本章的目的是确定:1)建立独立扫描数字模型的遮挡;2)将治疗后获得的数字模型与治疗前生成的相应数字模型设置进行注册。两种方法的可靠性通过随机抽取5个患者模型进行评估。在这两个实验中,每个患者都建立了三个模型的重复位置,并分别通过重复之间的最大表面差和重复之间表面距离的标准差来评估位置的可变性。根据获得的数据,我们得出结论,将独立扫描的模型配准到遮挡模型的扫描表面是可靠的。最终正畸数字模型与计划设置模型的表面对表面配准也是可重复的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信