Z H Zhang, J He, P Jiang, Y P Cui, J F Sun, J Xiong, F Mei
{"title":"[Research progress on the safety of paclitaxel drug-loaded devices].","authors":"Z H Zhang, J He, P Jiang, Y P Cui, J F Sun, J Xiong, F Mei","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20241224-00587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease, paclitaxel-coated device (PCD) have been widely used to reduce vascular restenosis, yet their safety remains controversial. Some scholars have suggested that PCD might increase long-term mortality, sparking widespread concern and debate. In recent years, a number of studies have provided support for the safety of PCD, believing that PCD have advantages in terms of re-intervention, patency rate, and reduction of amputation risk, and do not increase the risk of death. There is no direct relationship between the paclitaxel dose and mortality. Overall, the safety controversy primarily stems from methodological limitations in early studies. The latest research has provided safety evidence for their clinical application. However, further investigations are required to define the boundary conditions for their long-term safety, elucidate variations in responses across different patient populations, and clarify paclitaxel's mechanisms of action in vivo. Such efforts will facilitate optimal balancing of therapeutic efficacy and safety in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":60685,"journal":{"name":"中华外科杂志","volume":"63 7","pages":"637-641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20241224-00587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease, paclitaxel-coated device (PCD) have been widely used to reduce vascular restenosis, yet their safety remains controversial. Some scholars have suggested that PCD might increase long-term mortality, sparking widespread concern and debate. In recent years, a number of studies have provided support for the safety of PCD, believing that PCD have advantages in terms of re-intervention, patency rate, and reduction of amputation risk, and do not increase the risk of death. There is no direct relationship between the paclitaxel dose and mortality. Overall, the safety controversy primarily stems from methodological limitations in early studies. The latest research has provided safety evidence for their clinical application. However, further investigations are required to define the boundary conditions for their long-term safety, elucidate variations in responses across different patient populations, and clarify paclitaxel's mechanisms of action in vivo. Such efforts will facilitate optimal balancing of therapeutic efficacy and safety in clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg (monthly) is a high-level medical science and technology journal approved by the General Administration of Press and Publication of the People's Republic of China, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology, and organised by the Chinese Medical Association for domestic and international public circulation. It was founded in January 1951, and is published on the basis of the Journal of Chinese Surgery. The Journal is aimed at senior and intermediate surgeons and related researchers, mainly reporting the leading scientific research results and clinical experience in the field of surgery, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding effect on the clinical work of surgery.
Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg is committed to reflecting the major research progress in the field of surgery in China and promoting academic exchanges at home and abroad. The main columns include thesis, meta-analysis, review, expert forum, synthesis, case report, diagnosis and treatment experience, technical exchange, clinical case discussion, academic controversy, and special lectures, etc. The journal has been accepted by the National Academy of Medicine of the United States. The journal has been included in many famous databases at home and abroad, such as the Biomedical Analysis and Online Retrieval System (MEDLINE) of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.