Colonic diverticular disease: medical treatments for acute diverticulitis.

BMJ clinical evidence Pub Date : 2016-02-04
David Humes, Robin C Spiller
{"title":"Colonic diverticular disease: medical treatments for acute diverticulitis.","authors":"David Humes, Robin C Spiller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diverticula (mucosal outpouchings through the wall of the colon) are rare before the age of 40 years, after which prevalence increases steadily and reaches over 25% by 60 years. However, only 10% to 25% of affected people will develop symptoms such as lower abdominal pain. Recurrent symptoms are common, and 5% of people with diverticula eventually develop complications such as perforation, obstruction, haemorrhage, fistulae, or abscesses.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of medical treatments for acute diverticulitis? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to August 2014 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 193 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 75 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 37 studies and the further review of 38 full publications. Of the 38 full articles evaluated, four systematic reviews and one RCT were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for two PICO combinations</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for one comparison based on information about the effectiveness and safety of medical treatment (mesalazine, antibiotics [any] only) versus placebo or no treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":"2016 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4745836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diverticula (mucosal outpouchings through the wall of the colon) are rare before the age of 40 years, after which prevalence increases steadily and reaches over 25% by 60 years. However, only 10% to 25% of affected people will develop symptoms such as lower abdominal pain. Recurrent symptoms are common, and 5% of people with diverticula eventually develop complications such as perforation, obstruction, haemorrhage, fistulae, or abscesses.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of medical treatments for acute diverticulitis? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to August 2014 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).

Results: At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 193 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 75 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 37 studies and the further review of 38 full publications. Of the 38 full articles evaluated, four systematic reviews and one RCT were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for two PICO combinations

Conclusions: In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for one comparison based on information about the effectiveness and safety of medical treatment (mesalazine, antibiotics [any] only) versus placebo or no treatment.

结肠憩室病:急性憩室炎的医学治疗。
导读:憩室(通过肠壁的粘膜流出物)在40岁之前很少见,此后发病率稳步上升,到60岁时达到25%以上。然而,只有10%到25%的感染者会出现下腹部疼痛等症状。复发症状很常见,5%的憩室患者最终出现穿孔、梗阻、出血、瘘管或脓肿等并发症。方法和结果:我们进行了系统的综述,旨在回答以下临床问题:急性憩室炎的药物治疗效果如何?我们检索了截至2014年8月的Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library和其他重要数据库(临床证据综述定期更新;请查看我们的网站获取最新版本的概述)。结果:在本次更新中,检索电子数据库检索到193项研究。在删除和删除会议摘要后,筛选了75条记录纳入概述。对标题和摘要的评估导致37项研究被排除,38篇完整出版物被进一步审查。在被评估的38篇全文中,本次更新中增加了4篇系统综述和1篇随机对照试验。结论:在这一系统综述中,我们根据药物治疗(美沙拉嗪、抗生素)与安慰剂或不治疗的有效性和安全性信息对疗效进行了分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信