Joint Effects of Workplace and Everyday Discrimination on Sleep Disturbances: A 9-Year Prospective Cohort Study in U.S. Employees.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sunny Liu, Timothy A Matthews, Megan Guardiano, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda, Jian Li
{"title":"Joint Effects of Workplace and Everyday Discrimination on Sleep Disturbances: A 9-Year Prospective Cohort Study in U.S. Employees.","authors":"Sunny Liu, Timothy A Matthews, Megan Guardiano, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda, Jian Li","doi":"10.1007/s12529-025-10370-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor sleep quality is linked to increased risk for cardiometabolic complications and mortality. Previous research suggested workplace and everyday discrimination are separately linked to adverse sleep outcomes. The aim of this study is to examine the joint effects of workplace and everyday discrimination on sleep quality among middle-aged adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study were used, with a 9-year follow-up of 1,333 individuals free from sleep disturbances at baseline. Baseline measures of workplace and everyday discrimination were collected, and the incidence of sleep disturbances was assessed at follow-up. Poisson regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The synergy index was applied to evaluate whether the combined effect of both types of discrimination was greater than their individual effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workplace discrimination was associated with a higher risk of sleep disturbances (adjusted RR = 1.50 [1.09, 2.06]). Everyday discrimination also increased the risk of sleep disturbances (adjusted RR= 1.38 [1.00, 1.93]). The joint effect of workplace and everyday discrimination was associated with a higher risk of sleep disturbances (adjusted RR = 1.78 [1.16, 2.72]), with synergy index suggesting an additive interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both workplace and everyday discrimination independently affect sleep quality, with an additive interaction between the two. The double burden of workplace and everyday discrimination can significantly impact sleep disturbances. Further research is needed to explore the biological mechanisms linking discrimination and sleep disturbances.</p>","PeriodicalId":54208,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-025-10370-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poor sleep quality is linked to increased risk for cardiometabolic complications and mortality. Previous research suggested workplace and everyday discrimination are separately linked to adverse sleep outcomes. The aim of this study is to examine the joint effects of workplace and everyday discrimination on sleep quality among middle-aged adults.

Methods: Data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study were used, with a 9-year follow-up of 1,333 individuals free from sleep disturbances at baseline. Baseline measures of workplace and everyday discrimination were collected, and the incidence of sleep disturbances was assessed at follow-up. Poisson regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The synergy index was applied to evaluate whether the combined effect of both types of discrimination was greater than their individual effects.

Results: Workplace discrimination was associated with a higher risk of sleep disturbances (adjusted RR = 1.50 [1.09, 2.06]). Everyday discrimination also increased the risk of sleep disturbances (adjusted RR= 1.38 [1.00, 1.93]). The joint effect of workplace and everyday discrimination was associated with a higher risk of sleep disturbances (adjusted RR = 1.78 [1.16, 2.72]), with synergy index suggesting an additive interaction.

Conclusion: Both workplace and everyday discrimination independently affect sleep quality, with an additive interaction between the two. The double burden of workplace and everyday discrimination can significantly impact sleep disturbances. Further research is needed to explore the biological mechanisms linking discrimination and sleep disturbances.

工作场所和日常歧视对睡眠障碍的共同影响:一项针对美国员工的9年前瞻性队列研究。
背景:睡眠质量差与心脏代谢并发症和死亡率的风险增加有关。之前的研究表明,工作场所和日常生活中的歧视分别与不良睡眠结果有关。这项研究的目的是研究工作场所和日常歧视对中年人睡眠质量的共同影响。方法:使用来自美国中年(MIDUS)研究的数据,对1333名在基线时无睡眠障碍的个体进行了为期9年的随访。收集了工作场所和日常歧视的基线测量数据,并在随访中评估了睡眠障碍的发生率。使用泊松回归估计风险比(rr)和95%置信区间(ci)。运用协同效应指数评价两种歧视的综合效应是否大于其个体效应。结果:工作场所歧视与较高的睡眠障碍风险相关(调整后RR = 1.50[1.09, 2.06])。日常歧视也增加了睡眠障碍的风险(调整后RR= 1.38[1.00, 1.93])。工作场所和日常歧视的共同影响与较高的睡眠障碍风险相关(调整后的RR = 1.78[1.16, 2.72]),协同作用指数表明存在叠加性相互作用。结论:职场歧视和日常歧视都独立影响睡眠质量,两者之间存在加性交互作用。工作场所和日常歧视的双重负担会严重影响睡眠障碍。需要进一步的研究来探索歧视和睡眠障碍之间的生物学机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (IJBM) is the official scientific journal of the International Society for Behavioral Medicine (ISBM). IJBM seeks to present the best theoretically-driven, evidence-based work in the field of behavioral medicine from around the globe. IJBM embraces multiple theoretical perspectives, research methodologies, groups of interest, and levels of analysis. The journal is interested in research across the broad spectrum of behavioral medicine, including health-behavior relationships, the prevention of illness and the promotion of health, the effects of illness on the self and others, the effectiveness of novel interventions, identification of biobehavioral mechanisms, and the influence of social factors on health. We welcome experimental, non-experimental, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies as well as implementation and dissemination research, integrative reviews, and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信