Eunicia Ursu, Ana Mikolić, Bobo Tong, Noah D Silverberg, Nishtha Parag, Denise Foster, Mypinder S Sekhon, William Panenka, Sonny Thiara, Donald E G Griesdale
{"title":"Functional outcomes among the survivors of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a historical cohort study.","authors":"Eunicia Ursu, Ana Mikolić, Bobo Tong, Noah D Silverberg, Nishtha Parag, Denise Foster, Mypinder S Sekhon, William Panenka, Sonny Thiara, Donald E G Griesdale","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02965-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is increasingly being used in patients with respiratory failure. The goal of this study was to characterize postdischarge psychological and functional outcomes of this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a historical cohort study of survivors who required VV-ECMO during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using telephone interviews, we assessed the following domains: disability (using the World Health Organization Disability Schedule [WHODAS 2.0] and modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), health-related quality of life (using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level tool), cognition (using the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool), depression (using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (using the Impact of Event Scale-6). We used descriptive statistics to analyze our results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six participants with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 47 [42-59] yr and 6 (23%) of whom were female were evaluated at a median [IQR] of 22 [17-23] months after ECMO separation. Twenty-two (85%) had a diagnosis of COVID-19. The median [IQR] WHODAS 2.0 score was 26 [15-30] with the highest degree of disability in the mobility and participation domains. Of the 24 participants who were employed full-time, 12 (50%) were able to work in the same capacity. Of the 25 respondents who were living independently at baseline, 22 (88%) maintained complete independence for their activities of daily living (mRS < 3), one (4%) described persistent functional limitations (mRS = 3), and two (8%) required constant care (mRS = 4 or 5). Thirteen (52%) and nine (38%) reported at least moderate pain or anxiety, respectively. Ten (40%) and seven (28%) participants screened positive for symptoms of depression or posttraumatic stress disorder, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who required VV-ECMO experienced significant functional disability, pain, cognitive challenges, mental health problems, and lower quality of life approximately two years after discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02965-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is increasingly being used in patients with respiratory failure. The goal of this study was to characterize postdischarge psychological and functional outcomes of this patient population.
Methods: We conducted a historical cohort study of survivors who required VV-ECMO during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using telephone interviews, we assessed the following domains: disability (using the World Health Organization Disability Schedule [WHODAS 2.0] and modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), health-related quality of life (using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level tool), cognition (using the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool), depression (using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (using the Impact of Event Scale-6). We used descriptive statistics to analyze our results.
Results: Twenty-six participants with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 47 [42-59] yr and 6 (23%) of whom were female were evaluated at a median [IQR] of 22 [17-23] months after ECMO separation. Twenty-two (85%) had a diagnosis of COVID-19. The median [IQR] WHODAS 2.0 score was 26 [15-30] with the highest degree of disability in the mobility and participation domains. Of the 24 participants who were employed full-time, 12 (50%) were able to work in the same capacity. Of the 25 respondents who were living independently at baseline, 22 (88%) maintained complete independence for their activities of daily living (mRS < 3), one (4%) described persistent functional limitations (mRS = 3), and two (8%) required constant care (mRS = 4 or 5). Thirteen (52%) and nine (38%) reported at least moderate pain or anxiety, respectively. Ten (40%) and seven (28%) participants screened positive for symptoms of depression or posttraumatic stress disorder, respectively.
Conclusions: Patients who required VV-ECMO experienced significant functional disability, pain, cognitive challenges, mental health problems, and lower quality of life approximately two years after discharge.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’
Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the
first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened
considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published
monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article
types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences
articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing
professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content,
according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain,
perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines
and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French,
according to the language of submission.