Optimization of oncology biomarker testing in managed care: Best practices and consensus recommendations from an AMCP Market Insights program.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Diana Brixner, Terry Richardson, Catherine M Lockhart, Scott Ramsey, John Fox, Daryl Pritchard, Howard Mcleod, Laura Bobolts, Brian Bourbeau, Erin Crum
{"title":"Optimization of oncology biomarker testing in managed care: Best practices and consensus recommendations from an AMCP Market Insights program.","authors":"Diana Brixner, Terry Richardson, Catherine M Lockhart, Scott Ramsey, John Fox, Daryl Pritchard, Howard Mcleod, Laura Bobolts, Brian Bourbeau, Erin Crum","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.6-a.s1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Precision medicine in oncology using actionable molecular biomarkers to guide treatment selection has been associated with favorable outcomes; however, many potentially eligible patients do not receive it. This Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Market Insights program sought to characterize unmet needs in biomarker testing among managed care stakeholders, to develop best practice and consensus recommendations to support addressing these needs, and to gain insights on potential quality measures related to biomarker testing. The program used a modified Delphi process and included in-depth interviews with expert panelists, a national survey of managed care professionals, and a consensus survey of experts. Areas of unmet need in biomarker testing identified were education, guidelines and protocols, timeliness, process, and equity. Twenty-two best practices were suggested by managed care experts and other stakeholders; 9 of these best practices achieved consensus. These consensus recommendations addressed biomarker test ordering and test performance, treatment decisions based on biomarker testing, cost-effectiveness of biomarker testing, and health disparities in access to biomarker testing. Opportunities for education and improvements in infrastructure to implement these recommendations were identified. Further investigation is needed to develop quality measures; although, valuable insights were gained.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 6-a Suppl","pages":"S1-S14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.6-a.s1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precision medicine in oncology using actionable molecular biomarkers to guide treatment selection has been associated with favorable outcomes; however, many potentially eligible patients do not receive it. This Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Market Insights program sought to characterize unmet needs in biomarker testing among managed care stakeholders, to develop best practice and consensus recommendations to support addressing these needs, and to gain insights on potential quality measures related to biomarker testing. The program used a modified Delphi process and included in-depth interviews with expert panelists, a national survey of managed care professionals, and a consensus survey of experts. Areas of unmet need in biomarker testing identified were education, guidelines and protocols, timeliness, process, and equity. Twenty-two best practices were suggested by managed care experts and other stakeholders; 9 of these best practices achieved consensus. These consensus recommendations addressed biomarker test ordering and test performance, treatment decisions based on biomarker testing, cost-effectiveness of biomarker testing, and health disparities in access to biomarker testing. Opportunities for education and improvements in infrastructure to implement these recommendations were identified. Further investigation is needed to develop quality measures; although, valuable insights were gained.

管理式医疗中肿瘤生物标志物测试的优化:AMCP市场洞察项目的最佳实践和共识建议。
精准医学在肿瘤学中使用可操作的分子生物标志物来指导治疗选择与良好的结果相关;然而,许多潜在的合格患者并没有接受它。管理式医疗学院药房市场洞察项目旨在描述管理式医疗利益相关者在生物标志物检测方面未满足的需求,制定最佳实践和共识建议,以支持解决这些需求,并获得与生物标志物检测相关的潜在质量措施的见解。该项目采用了改进的德尔菲程序,包括对专家小组成员的深度访谈、对管理式医疗专业人员的全国调查和对专家的共识调查。生物标志物检测中未满足需求的领域包括教育、指南和方案、及时性、过程和公平性。管理式护理专家和其他利益攸关方提出了22项最佳做法;这些最佳实践中有9个达成了共识。这些共识建议涉及生物标记物检测顺序和检测性能、基于生物标记物检测的治疗决策、生物标记物检测的成本效益以及获得生物标记物检测的健康差异。确定了实施这些建议的教育和改善基础设施的机会。需要进一步调查以制定质量措施;尽管如此,我们还是获得了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信