Longitudinal links between perinatal grief and sexual well-being for couples after pregnancy loss.

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Family Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI:10.1037/fam0001357
David B Allsop, Kathleen Nesbitt-Daly, Katherine Péloquin, Heather Cockwell, Natalie O Rosen
{"title":"Longitudinal links between perinatal grief and sexual well-being for couples after pregnancy loss.","authors":"David B Allsop, Kathleen Nesbitt-Daly, Katherine Péloquin, Heather Cockwell, Natalie O Rosen","doi":"10.1037/fam0001357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pregnancy loss disrupts couples' sexual well-being, which is crucial to health and relationship quality, yet it is unclear what predicts sexual well-being postloss. Symbolic interactionism theory and prior literature point to perinatal grief as one potential predictor. Thus, our objective was to examine how perinatal grief of either couple member relates longitudinally to both couple members' sexual well-being after a pregnancy loss. We conducted multilevel structural equation modeling assessing whether fluctuations in perinatal grief were associated with fluctuations in sexual well-being for oneself and a partner among 109 couples who experienced a pregnancy loss in the past 4 months and who completed four monthly surveys. We also tested whether those with the highest average perinatal grief had the lowest average sexual well-being. When either partner reported greater than typical perinatal grief, both couple members reported lower than typical sexual satisfaction and sexual desire, and higher than typical sexual function problems and sexual distress. Those with the highest average perinatal grief had the lowest average sexual satisfaction and highest average sexual function problems and sexual distress. Higher perinatal grief may be a risk factor for lower sexual well-being. Couples who grieve effectively postloss may better manage sexual challenges. Practitioners can screen couples for perinatal grief as they assess impacts to sexuality, refer them to grief resources to promote sexual well-being, and invite them to discuss how meanings around sex may have changed postloss. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"627-638"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pregnancy loss disrupts couples' sexual well-being, which is crucial to health and relationship quality, yet it is unclear what predicts sexual well-being postloss. Symbolic interactionism theory and prior literature point to perinatal grief as one potential predictor. Thus, our objective was to examine how perinatal grief of either couple member relates longitudinally to both couple members' sexual well-being after a pregnancy loss. We conducted multilevel structural equation modeling assessing whether fluctuations in perinatal grief were associated with fluctuations in sexual well-being for oneself and a partner among 109 couples who experienced a pregnancy loss in the past 4 months and who completed four monthly surveys. We also tested whether those with the highest average perinatal grief had the lowest average sexual well-being. When either partner reported greater than typical perinatal grief, both couple members reported lower than typical sexual satisfaction and sexual desire, and higher than typical sexual function problems and sexual distress. Those with the highest average perinatal grief had the lowest average sexual satisfaction and highest average sexual function problems and sexual distress. Higher perinatal grief may be a risk factor for lower sexual well-being. Couples who grieve effectively postloss may better manage sexual challenges. Practitioners can screen couples for perinatal grief as they assess impacts to sexuality, refer them to grief resources to promote sexual well-being, and invite them to discuss how meanings around sex may have changed postloss. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

流产夫妇围产期悲伤与性健康的纵向联系。
怀孕失败会破坏夫妻的性生活,而这对健康和关系质量至关重要,但目前还不清楚是什么预测了怀孕失败后的性生活。符号互动理论和先前的文献指出围产期悲伤是一个潜在的预测因子。因此,我们的目的是研究在怀孕失败后,任何一对夫妇的围产期悲伤是如何与夫妻双方的性健康纵向相关的。我们对109对在过去4个月内流产并完成4个月调查的夫妇进行了多层次结构方程建模,以评估围产期悲伤的波动是否与自己和伴侣的性健康波动有关。我们还测试了那些平均围产期悲伤程度最高的人是否平均性生活幸福程度最低。当伴侣中的任何一方报告的围产期悲伤大于典型时,夫妻双方报告的性满足和性欲都低于典型,而高于典型的性功能问题和性困扰。那些平均围产期悲伤程度最高的人,平均性满意度最低,平均性功能问题和性困扰最高。较高的围产期悲伤可能是较低的性健康的一个风险因素。痛失亲人后有效悲伤的夫妇可能会更好地应对性挑战。在评估对性行为的影响时,从业者可以对夫妇进行围产期悲伤筛查,将他们转介到悲伤资源以促进性健康,并邀请他们讨论在失去亲人后,性的意义可能会发生怎样的变化。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信