Impact of nivolumab monotherapy infusion time-of-day on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359251339921
Yasunobu Ishizuka, Yukiya Narita, Tomoki Sakakida, Munehiro Wakabayashi, Hiroyuki Kodama, Kazunori Honda, Toshiki Masuishi, Hiroya Taniguchi, Shigenori Kadowaki, Masashi Ando, Masahiro Tajika, Kei Muro
{"title":"Impact of nivolumab monotherapy infusion time-of-day on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.","authors":"Yasunobu Ishizuka, Yukiya Narita, Tomoki Sakakida, Munehiro Wakabayashi, Hiroyuki Kodama, Kazunori Honda, Toshiki Masuishi, Hiroya Taniguchi, Shigenori Kadowaki, Masashi Ando, Masahiro Tajika, Kei Muro","doi":"10.1177/17588359251339921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors are used either as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic agents in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). Studies show that circadian rhythms are essential for immune system functions, including anticancer immunity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated whether the time of day of nivolumab infusion altered the efficacy of mGC treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of 296 consecutive patients with mGC who received nivolumab monotherapy between December 2014 and December 2022. Patients were divided into early (EA)- and late (LA)-nivolumab infusion groups: the EA and LA groups received ⩾70% and <70% of their infusions before 14:00, respectively. Treatment efficacy was compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 248 patients were eligible: 140 and 108 in the EA and LA groups, respectively. Most baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except for differences in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the EA than in the LA group (median PFS, 2.3 vs 1.6 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.65; <i>p</i> < 0.01; median OS, 7.6 vs 3.9 months; HR, 0.64; <i>p</i> < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, EA was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (adjusted HR, 0.70; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and OS (adjusted HR, 0.67; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Immune-related adverse events were more frequent in the EA than in the LA group (40.7% vs 29.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that scheduling nivolumab infusions before mid-afternoon should be considered in daily practice for the treatment of mGC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251339921"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251339921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are used either as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic agents in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). Studies show that circadian rhythms are essential for immune system functions, including anticancer immunity.

Objectives: This study evaluated whether the time of day of nivolumab infusion altered the efficacy of mGC treatment.

Design: This was a retrospective cohort study.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 296 consecutive patients with mGC who received nivolumab monotherapy between December 2014 and December 2022. Patients were divided into early (EA)- and late (LA)-nivolumab infusion groups: the EA and LA groups received ⩾70% and <70% of their infusions before 14:00, respectively. Treatment efficacy was compared between the groups.

Results: A total of 248 patients were eligible: 140 and 108 in the EA and LA groups, respectively. Most baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except for differences in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the EA than in the LA group (median PFS, 2.3 vs 1.6 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.65; p < 0.01; median OS, 7.6 vs 3.9 months; HR, 0.64; p < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, EA was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (adjusted HR, 0.70; p < 0.01) and OS (adjusted HR, 0.67; p < 0.01). Immune-related adverse events were more frequent in the EA than in the LA group (40.7% vs 29.6%, p = 0.07).

Conclusion: Our data suggest that scheduling nivolumab infusions before mid-afternoon should be considered in daily practice for the treatment of mGC.

纳武单抗单药输注时间对转移性胃癌患者短期和长期预后的影响。
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂用于转移性胃癌(mGC)的单药治疗或与细胞毒性药物联合治疗。研究表明,昼夜节律对包括抗癌免疫在内的免疫系统功能至关重要。目的:本研究评估每天输注纳武单抗的时间是否会改变mGC治疗的疗效。设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究。方法:回顾性分析2014年12月至2022年12月期间连续接受纳武单抗单药治疗的296例mGC患者的资料。患者被分为早期(EA)和晚期(LA)-nivolumab输注组:EA和LA组接受了小于70%的治疗,结果:共有248名患者符合条件:EA和LA组分别为140和108名。除了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比例的差异外,两组之间的大多数基线特征相似。EA组的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)显著优于LA组(中位PFS, 2.3个月vs 1.6个月;风险比(HR), 0.65;p p p p p = 0.07)。结论:我们的数据表明,在日常治疗mGC的实践中,应该考虑在中午之前安排纳武单抗输注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信