Perceptions of chiropractic students on digital literacy skills at a South African university: A cross-sectional study.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Candice Nicola Pyper, Brittney Anne Moore, Fatima Ismail
{"title":"Perceptions of chiropractic students on digital literacy skills at a South African university: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Candice Nicola Pyper, Brittney Anne Moore, Fatima Ismail","doi":"10.7899/JCE-24-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess chiropractic students' opinions of their digital literacy proficiencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, quantitative, and exploratory study was conducted with 1st to 4th year bachelor of health sciences and 1st to 2nd year master of health sciences chiropractic students (n = 244) at the University of Johannesburg using an anonymous, self-administered online Likert-style questionnaire. The 41-item survey collected demographic data and students' self-perceptions on 4 aspects of digital literacy skills, namely, information literacy (IL), information communications technology literacy (ICTL), information and communications technology utilization (ICTU), and media literacy (ML). Data were analyzed according to the 4 constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 57.78% (n = 141). The majority of students were 18-24 years of age and female and the highest year cohort was from 1st year master of health sciences chiropractic students. Students reported high levels of agreement within IL (M = 4.220; SD = .472), and ML (M = 4.271; SD = .507) constructs and lower levels of agreement within ICTL (M = 3.808; SD = .568) and ICTU (M = 3.762; SD = .562) constructs. Age and sex were not statistically significant; academic year was significant for IL only (p = .040). All 4 constructs exhibited acceptable internal consistency (IL: 0.862; ICTL: 0.830; ICTU: 0.840; ML: 0.844).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gaps were highlighted in the perception of ICTL and ICTU skills in all chiropractic students and trends emphasizing differences between basic and higher order levels of digital literacy skills between junior and senior years of study, respectively. There is a need to bridge the gap in skills at department, faculty, and university levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"39 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-24-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess chiropractic students' opinions of their digital literacy proficiencies.

Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative, and exploratory study was conducted with 1st to 4th year bachelor of health sciences and 1st to 2nd year master of health sciences chiropractic students (n = 244) at the University of Johannesburg using an anonymous, self-administered online Likert-style questionnaire. The 41-item survey collected demographic data and students' self-perceptions on 4 aspects of digital literacy skills, namely, information literacy (IL), information communications technology literacy (ICTL), information and communications technology utilization (ICTU), and media literacy (ML). Data were analyzed according to the 4 constructs.

Results: The response rate was 57.78% (n = 141). The majority of students were 18-24 years of age and female and the highest year cohort was from 1st year master of health sciences chiropractic students. Students reported high levels of agreement within IL (M = 4.220; SD = .472), and ML (M = 4.271; SD = .507) constructs and lower levels of agreement within ICTL (M = 3.808; SD = .568) and ICTU (M = 3.762; SD = .562) constructs. Age and sex were not statistically significant; academic year was significant for IL only (p = .040). All 4 constructs exhibited acceptable internal consistency (IL: 0.862; ICTL: 0.830; ICTU: 0.840; ML: 0.844).

Conclusion: Gaps were highlighted in the perception of ICTL and ICTU skills in all chiropractic students and trends emphasizing differences between basic and higher order levels of digital literacy skills between junior and senior years of study, respectively. There is a need to bridge the gap in skills at department, faculty, and university levels.

一所南非大学脊椎按摩专业学生对数字素养技能的看法:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估捏脊医学生对其数字素养熟练程度的看法。方法:采用匿名、自我管理的在线李克特式问卷,对约翰内斯堡大学一至四年级健康科学学士和一至二年级健康科学硕士脊椎指压专业学生(244人)进行了横断面、定量和探索性研究。这项41项调查收集了人口统计数据和学生对数字素养技能4个方面的自我认知,即信息素养(IL)、信息通信技术素养(ICTL)、信息通信技术利用(ICTU)和媒体素养(ML)。按4种构念对数据进行分析。结果:有效率为57.78% (n = 141)。学生的年龄以18-24岁的女性居多,年龄最高的是卫生科学硕士一年级的捏脊医学生。学生报告在IL内的一致性很高(M = 4.220;SD = .472)和ML (M = 4.271;SD = .507)结构和ICTL内较低水平的一致性(M = 3.808;SD = .568)和ICTU (M = 3.762;SD = .562)结构。年龄、性别差异无统计学意义;学年仅对IL有显著性意义(p = 0.040)。4个构念均表现出可接受的内部一致性(IL: 0.862;ICTL: 0.830;爱尔兰工会:0.840;ML: 0.844)。结论:所有捏脊学生对ICTL和ICTU技能的认知存在明显差距,并且趋势强调了初级和高级数字素养技能在大三和大四之间的差异。有必要弥合部门、教员和大学水平上的技能差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信