NMDA Receptor Involvement in Dopaminergic Modulation of Neuroplasticity Induced by Paired Associative Stimulation.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marie C Beaupain, Elham Ghanavati, Amba M Frese, Lorena Melo, Min-Fang Kuo, Michael A Nitsche
{"title":"NMDA Receptor Involvement in Dopaminergic Modulation of Neuroplasticity Induced by Paired Associative Stimulation.","authors":"Marie C Beaupain, Elham Ghanavati, Amba M Frese, Lorena Melo, Min-Fang Kuo, Michael A Nitsche","doi":"10.1093/ijnp/pyaf038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dopamine (DA) modulates long-term potentiation (LTP)-like neuroplasticity. While particularly D1 and D2 receptors are thought to influence neuroplasticity through glutamatergic NMDA receptor and GABA modulation, the exact mechanisms are not completely clarified.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to explore the relevance of NMDA receptor activity for DAergic modulation of focal LTP-like plasticity induced by excitatory paired associative stimulation (ePAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled design, 17 healthy participants received DAergic agents (100 mg L-Dopa for general DAergic enhancement, 10 mg bromocriptine for selective D2 receptor activation, or placebo) with different doses of the partial NMDA receptor agonist D-cycloserine (CYC; 50, 100, 200 mg or placebo) and underwent ePAS. Cortical excitability was monitored via motor-evoked potentials induced by TMS over the left motor cortex for up to two hours post-stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not find significant interactions between DAergic agents, CYC and time across the entire sample, but significant group differences depending on sensitivity to ePAS. In high-sensitivity, but not low-sensitivity participants, ePAS induced LTP-like effects. CYC produced non-linear, dose-dependent effects on plasticity in both groups. In the high-sensitivity group, LTP-like effects persisted under both DAergic agents, but were significantly reduced under bromocriptine. CYC had a non-linear effect when combined with bromocriptine. In the low-sensitivity group, ePAS under DAergic agents did not induce LTP-like effects, and only additional intervention with medium-dose CYC restored facilitatory effects under L-Dopa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that optimal NMDA receptor activation is necessary for ePAS-induced neuroplasticity and that D2 receptor activity may reduce LTP-like effects by downregulating NMDA receptor function.</p>","PeriodicalId":14134,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaf038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dopamine (DA) modulates long-term potentiation (LTP)-like neuroplasticity. While particularly D1 and D2 receptors are thought to influence neuroplasticity through glutamatergic NMDA receptor and GABA modulation, the exact mechanisms are not completely clarified.

Objective: We aimed to explore the relevance of NMDA receptor activity for DAergic modulation of focal LTP-like plasticity induced by excitatory paired associative stimulation (ePAS).

Methods: In a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled design, 17 healthy participants received DAergic agents (100 mg L-Dopa for general DAergic enhancement, 10 mg bromocriptine for selective D2 receptor activation, or placebo) with different doses of the partial NMDA receptor agonist D-cycloserine (CYC; 50, 100, 200 mg or placebo) and underwent ePAS. Cortical excitability was monitored via motor-evoked potentials induced by TMS over the left motor cortex for up to two hours post-stimulation.

Results: We did not find significant interactions between DAergic agents, CYC and time across the entire sample, but significant group differences depending on sensitivity to ePAS. In high-sensitivity, but not low-sensitivity participants, ePAS induced LTP-like effects. CYC produced non-linear, dose-dependent effects on plasticity in both groups. In the high-sensitivity group, LTP-like effects persisted under both DAergic agents, but were significantly reduced under bromocriptine. CYC had a non-linear effect when combined with bromocriptine. In the low-sensitivity group, ePAS under DAergic agents did not induce LTP-like effects, and only additional intervention with medium-dose CYC restored facilitatory effects under L-Dopa.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that optimal NMDA receptor activation is necessary for ePAS-induced neuroplasticity and that D2 receptor activity may reduce LTP-like effects by downregulating NMDA receptor function.

NMDA受体参与配对联想刺激诱导的多巴胺能调节神经可塑性。
背景:多巴胺(DA)调节长时程增强(LTP)样神经可塑性。虽然D1和D2受体被认为通过谷氨酸能NMDA受体和GABA调节影响神经可塑性,但确切的机制尚不完全清楚。目的:探讨NMDA受体活性与兴奋性配对联想刺激(ePAS)诱导的局灶ltp样可塑性的能量调节的相关性。方法:在双盲、随机和安慰剂对照设计中,17名健康参与者接受了不同剂量的部分NMDA受体激动剂d -环丝氨酸(CYC)和不同剂量的达能药物(100 mg左旋多巴用于一般达能增强,10 mg溴隐肽用于选择性D2受体激活,或安慰剂);50、100、200毫克或安慰剂),并接受ePAS治疗。刺激后2小时,通过经颅磁刺激在左侧运动皮层诱导的运动诱发电位监测皮质兴奋性。结果:在整个样本中,我们没有发现抗癌药、CYC和时间之间的显著相互作用,但根据对ePAS的敏感性,组间存在显著差异。在高灵敏度而非低灵敏度的受试者中,ePAS诱导ltp样效应。CYC对两组小鼠的可塑性均产生非线性、剂量依赖性的影响。在高敏感组,ltp样效应在两种能药下持续存在,但在溴隐亭下明显减弱。CYC与溴隐亭联用时呈非线性效应。在低敏感组中,ePAS在达能药物作用下未诱导ltp样效应,只有中剂量CYC的额外干预才能恢复左旋多巴作用下的促进效应。结论:epas诱导的神经可塑性需要最佳的NMDA受体激活,而D2受体活性可能通过下调NMDA受体功能来降低ltp样效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The central focus of the journal is on research that advances understanding of existing and new neuropsychopharmacological agents including their mode of action and clinical application or provides insights into the biological basis of psychiatric disorders and thereby advances their pharmacological treatment. Such research may derive from the full spectrum of biological and psychological fields of inquiry encompassing classical and novel techniques in neuropsychopharmacology as well as strategies such as neuroimaging, genetics, psychoneuroendocrinology and neuropsychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信