PD-L1 Expression in Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison Across Antibody Clones and Role as a Predictor of Response to Chemoimmunotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.
Juan J Juarez-Vignon Whaley, Soravis Osataphan, Ben Ponvilawan, Nipith Charoenngam, Mary Linton Peters
{"title":"PD-L1 Expression in Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison Across Antibody Clones and Role as a Predictor of Response to Chemoimmunotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Juan J Juarez-Vignon Whaley, Soravis Osataphan, Ben Ponvilawan, Nipith Charoenngam, Mary Linton Peters","doi":"10.1200/PO-24-00475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>PD-L1 positivity in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) is reported from 4% to 76%. BTC clinical trials have not demonstrated PD-L1 expression as a predictor of response to chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (chemo-ICI). This meta-analysis examines PD-L1 positivity rates in BTC and association between PD-L1 expression and outcomes in patients treated with chemo-ICI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Observational studies or clinical trials reporting tissue-based PD-L1 expression by Tumor Proportional Score/Combined Positive Score using immunohistochemistry were included. Clinical trials of BTC treated with chemo-ICI were included to assess PD-L1 expression on treatment response. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies before November 15, 2023. Methods of PD-L1 assessment, including antibody clone, cutoff for PD-L1 positivity, and anatomical subtype, were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and objective response rates (ORRs) were the main outcomes. The generic inverse variance method and random-effect model were used to assess pooled effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six studies met eligibility criteria. Among 7,768 patients, pooled PD-L1 positivity was 30%. Positivity rates varied significantly by antibody clone (5H1, 58% <i>v</i> SP142, 17%; <i>P</i> = .02). Clinical trials reported a higher positivity rate compared with observational studies (48% <i>v</i> 26%; <i>P</i> < .01). Across five phase I/II clinical trials (194 patients), PD-L1 ≥1% patients tended to have a better ORR than PD-L1 <1% patients (64% <i>v</i> 46%; <i>P</i> = .08). In two randomized controlled trials (874 patients), PD-L1 ≥1% had a statistically significant improvement in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; <i>P</i> < .01), while PD-L1 <1% did not (HR, 0.85; <i>P</i> = .2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the high PD-L1 positivity rate seen in this study, as well as a possible signal of predictive response for chemo-ICI treatment, PD-L1 expression should be further explored as a predictive biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400475"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: PD-L1 positivity in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) is reported from 4% to 76%. BTC clinical trials have not demonstrated PD-L1 expression as a predictor of response to chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (chemo-ICI). This meta-analysis examines PD-L1 positivity rates in BTC and association between PD-L1 expression and outcomes in patients treated with chemo-ICI.
Materials and methods: Observational studies or clinical trials reporting tissue-based PD-L1 expression by Tumor Proportional Score/Combined Positive Score using immunohistochemistry were included. Clinical trials of BTC treated with chemo-ICI were included to assess PD-L1 expression on treatment response. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies before November 15, 2023. Methods of PD-L1 assessment, including antibody clone, cutoff for PD-L1 positivity, and anatomical subtype, were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and objective response rates (ORRs) were the main outcomes. The generic inverse variance method and random-effect model were used to assess pooled effect sizes.
Results: Fifty-six studies met eligibility criteria. Among 7,768 patients, pooled PD-L1 positivity was 30%. Positivity rates varied significantly by antibody clone (5H1, 58% v SP142, 17%; P = .02). Clinical trials reported a higher positivity rate compared with observational studies (48% v 26%; P < .01). Across five phase I/II clinical trials (194 patients), PD-L1 ≥1% patients tended to have a better ORR than PD-L1 <1% patients (64% v 46%; P = .08). In two randomized controlled trials (874 patients), PD-L1 ≥1% had a statistically significant improvement in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; P < .01), while PD-L1 <1% did not (HR, 0.85; P = .2).
Conclusion: Given the high PD-L1 positivity rate seen in this study, as well as a possible signal of predictive response for chemo-ICI treatment, PD-L1 expression should be further explored as a predictive biomarker.