Decreased peak atrial longitudinal strain and left atrial contraction strain rate values may predict atrial fibrillation in patients in sinus rhythm at baseline: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf024
Henriette Mészáros, Rita Nagy, Péter Fehérvári, Péter Hegyi, Enikő Pomozi, Zsombor Simon, Andrea Ágnes Molnár, Sándor Nardai, Béla Péter Merkely, Pál Ábrahám
{"title":"Decreased peak atrial longitudinal strain and left atrial contraction strain rate values may predict atrial fibrillation in patients in sinus rhythm at baseline: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Henriette Mészáros, Rita Nagy, Péter Fehérvári, Péter Hegyi, Enikő Pomozi, Zsombor Simon, Andrea Ágnes Molnár, Sándor Nardai, Béla Péter Merkely, Pál Ábrahám","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the broadening spectrum of heart rhythm-monitoring techniques, the most appropriate modality and duration to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) are not consensual. Two-dimensional speckle tracking for left atrial strain analysis seems feasible to detect atrial cardiomyopathy, which represents a substrate for AF. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and contraction strain rate (pLAct) differences as primary outcomes measured in sinus rhythm (SR) between patients with and without future AF during follow-up (FU). Random-effect model was used. For continuous outcomes, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) to compare the two groups We identified eight eligible articles consisting of 1230 patients. Six articles were eligible for quantitative PALS analysis, while three were eligible regarding pLAct. The baseline parameters of the future AF and SR patients were comparable in most of the papers. The PALS value in patients developing future AF was significantly lower compared to patients with no AF (WMD: -5.55% 95% CI -7.06 to -4.03%). Pooled WMD of pLAct between the groups was -0.44 1/s, 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.33 1/s. Baseline PALS and pLAct values of future AF patients were significantly lower than those who remained in SR during FU. PALS and pLAct seem to be sensitive parameters which can be implemented in a predictive model for AF enabling us to find patients who need prolonged heart rhythm-monitoringand it can be also a guidance for oral anticoagulation indication setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 3","pages":"oeaf024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the broadening spectrum of heart rhythm-monitoring techniques, the most appropriate modality and duration to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) are not consensual. Two-dimensional speckle tracking for left atrial strain analysis seems feasible to detect atrial cardiomyopathy, which represents a substrate for AF. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and contraction strain rate (pLAct) differences as primary outcomes measured in sinus rhythm (SR) between patients with and without future AF during follow-up (FU). Random-effect model was used. For continuous outcomes, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) to compare the two groups We identified eight eligible articles consisting of 1230 patients. Six articles were eligible for quantitative PALS analysis, while three were eligible regarding pLAct. The baseline parameters of the future AF and SR patients were comparable in most of the papers. The PALS value in patients developing future AF was significantly lower compared to patients with no AF (WMD: -5.55% 95% CI -7.06 to -4.03%). Pooled WMD of pLAct between the groups was -0.44 1/s, 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.33 1/s. Baseline PALS and pLAct values of future AF patients were significantly lower than those who remained in SR during FU. PALS and pLAct seem to be sensitive parameters which can be implemented in a predictive model for AF enabling us to find patients who need prolonged heart rhythm-monitoringand it can be also a guidance for oral anticoagulation indication setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

降低峰值心房纵应变和左心房收缩应变值可以预测基线窦性心律患者的心房颤动:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
尽管心律监测技术的范围越来越广,但检测心房颤动(AF)的最合适的方式和持续时间并不是双方同意的。二维斑点跟踪左心房应变分析似乎可以检测心房心肌病,心房心肌病是房颤的基础。我们的目的是对心房纵向应变峰值(PALS)和收缩应变率(pLAct)差异进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,作为随访(FU)期间有和没有未来房颤的患者的窦性心律(SR)的主要结局。采用随机效应模型。对于连续结果,我们计算加权平均差异(WMD)来比较两组。我们确定了8篇符合条件的文章,包括1230名患者。6篇文章符合定量PALS分析,3篇文章符合pLAct分析。在大多数论文中,未来房颤和SR患者的基线参数具有可比性。未来发生房颤患者的PALS值明显低于无房颤患者(WMD: -5.55% 95% CI -7.06 ~ -4.03%)。各组间pLAct合并WMD为-0.44 1/s, 95% CI为-0.56 ~ -0.33 1/s。未来房颤患者的基线PALS和pLAct值明显低于FU期间保持SR的患者。pal和pLAct似乎是一个敏感的参数,可以在房颤预测模型中实施,使我们能够找到需要长时间心律监测的患者,也可以指导口服抗凝指征的设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信