Minimizing Systematic Errors in Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data Using Standardization, Background Subtraction, and Non-Parametric Regression.

Mitas Ray, Keith Shockley, Grace Kissling
{"title":"Minimizing Systematic Errors in Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data Using Standardization, Background Subtraction, and Non-Parametric Regression.","authors":"Mitas Ray, Keith Shockley, Grace Kissling","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) has the potential to transform traditional toxicological testing by greatly increasing throughput and lowering costs on a per chemical basis. However, before qHTS data can be utilized for toxicity assessment, systematic errors such as row, column, cluster, and edge effects in raw data readouts need to be removed. Normalization seeks to minimize effects of systematic errors. Linear (LN) normalization, such as standardization and background removal, minimizes row and column effects. Alternatively, local weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS or LO) minimizes cluster effects. Both approaches have been used to normalize large scale data sets in other contexts. A new method is proposed in this paper to combine these two approaches (LNLO) to account for systematic errors within and between experiments. Heat maps illustrate that the LNLO method is more effective in removing systematic error than either the LN or the LO approach alone. All analyses were performed on an estrogen receptor agonist assay data set generated as part of the Tox21 collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":91818,"journal":{"name":"The journal of experimental secondary science","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of experimental secondary science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) has the potential to transform traditional toxicological testing by greatly increasing throughput and lowering costs on a per chemical basis. However, before qHTS data can be utilized for toxicity assessment, systematic errors such as row, column, cluster, and edge effects in raw data readouts need to be removed. Normalization seeks to minimize effects of systematic errors. Linear (LN) normalization, such as standardization and background removal, minimizes row and column effects. Alternatively, local weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS or LO) minimizes cluster effects. Both approaches have been used to normalize large scale data sets in other contexts. A new method is proposed in this paper to combine these two approaches (LNLO) to account for systematic errors within and between experiments. Heat maps illustrate that the LNLO method is more effective in removing systematic error than either the LN or the LO approach alone. All analyses were performed on an estrogen receptor agonist assay data set generated as part of the Tox21 collaboration.

使用标准化、背景减法和非参数回归最小化定量高通量筛选数据的系统误差。
定量高通量筛选(qHTS)通过大大提高通量和降低每种化学物质的成本,有可能改变传统的毒理学测试。然而,在利用qHTS数据进行毒性评估之前,需要消除原始数据读出中的行、列、簇和边缘效应等系统误差。标准化力求将系统错误的影响降到最低。线性(LN)归一化,例如标准化和背景删除,可以最小化行和列的效果。或者,局部加权散点图平滑(黄土或LO)最小化聚类效应。这两种方法都被用于在其他环境中规范化大规模数据集。本文提出了一种新的方法来结合这两种方法(LNLO)来解释实验内部和实验之间的系统误差。热图表明,LNLO方法在消除系统误差方面比单独使用LN或LO方法更有效。所有的分析都是在雌激素受体激动剂测定数据集上进行的,这些数据集是Tox21合作项目的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信