{"title":"The impact of proton pump inhibitor use on fusion rates following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.","authors":"Yu Chang, Yu-Shiuan Lin, Chih-Yuan Huang, Ming-Tsung Chuang, Kuan-Yu Chi, Junmin Song, Hong-Min Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08977-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lumbar spinal fusion surgery is a common treatment for degenerative spinal conditions. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed for acid-related disorders, emerging evidence suggests that PPI use may negatively affect bone health, potentially influencing spinal fusion outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on fusion rates following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the Global Collaborative Network on the TriNetX platform. Patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion were identified using ICD and CPT codes. Propensity score matching was employed to balance demographics and comorbidities between PPI users and non-users. Postoperative PPI use was defined as continuous use for at least three months following surgery. Non-fusion was identified using ICD-10 code M96.0 at six months, one year, and two years post-surgery. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the risk of pseudarthrosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 3,857 PPI users and 4,4291 non-users, reduced to 3,847 in each group after propensity score matching. PPI users showed a significantly higher risk of non-fusion at six months (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.54-2.16), one year (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.78-2.44), and two years (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 2.01-2.71) compared to non-users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that postoperative PPI use is linked to a higher risk of non-fusion after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Clinicians may need to weigh the benefits of postoperative PPI use against its potential impact on bone healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08977-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Lumbar spinal fusion surgery is a common treatment for degenerative spinal conditions. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed for acid-related disorders, emerging evidence suggests that PPI use may negatively affect bone health, potentially influencing spinal fusion outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on fusion rates following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Methods: Data were obtained from the Global Collaborative Network on the TriNetX platform. Patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion were identified using ICD and CPT codes. Propensity score matching was employed to balance demographics and comorbidities between PPI users and non-users. Postoperative PPI use was defined as continuous use for at least three months following surgery. Non-fusion was identified using ICD-10 code M96.0 at six months, one year, and two years post-surgery. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the risk of pseudarthrosis.
Results: The study included 3,857 PPI users and 4,4291 non-users, reduced to 3,847 in each group after propensity score matching. PPI users showed a significantly higher risk of non-fusion at six months (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.54-2.16), one year (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.78-2.44), and two years (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 2.01-2.71) compared to non-users.
Conclusion: The study indicates that postoperative PPI use is linked to a higher risk of non-fusion after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Clinicians may need to weigh the benefits of postoperative PPI use against its potential impact on bone healing.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe