The impact of proton pump inhibitor use on fusion rates following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yu Chang, Yu-Shiuan Lin, Chih-Yuan Huang, Ming-Tsung Chuang, Kuan-Yu Chi, Junmin Song, Hong-Min Lin
{"title":"The impact of proton pump inhibitor use on fusion rates following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.","authors":"Yu Chang, Yu-Shiuan Lin, Chih-Yuan Huang, Ming-Tsung Chuang, Kuan-Yu Chi, Junmin Song, Hong-Min Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08977-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lumbar spinal fusion surgery is a common treatment for degenerative spinal conditions. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed for acid-related disorders, emerging evidence suggests that PPI use may negatively affect bone health, potentially influencing spinal fusion outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on fusion rates following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the Global Collaborative Network on the TriNetX platform. Patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion were identified using ICD and CPT codes. Propensity score matching was employed to balance demographics and comorbidities between PPI users and non-users. Postoperative PPI use was defined as continuous use for at least three months following surgery. Non-fusion was identified using ICD-10 code M96.0 at six months, one year, and two years post-surgery. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the risk of pseudarthrosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 3,857 PPI users and 4,4291 non-users, reduced to 3,847 in each group after propensity score matching. PPI users showed a significantly higher risk of non-fusion at six months (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.54-2.16), one year (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.78-2.44), and two years (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 2.01-2.71) compared to non-users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that postoperative PPI use is linked to a higher risk of non-fusion after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Clinicians may need to weigh the benefits of postoperative PPI use against its potential impact on bone healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08977-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Lumbar spinal fusion surgery is a common treatment for degenerative spinal conditions. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed for acid-related disorders, emerging evidence suggests that PPI use may negatively affect bone health, potentially influencing spinal fusion outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on fusion rates following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Methods: Data were obtained from the Global Collaborative Network on the TriNetX platform. Patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion were identified using ICD and CPT codes. Propensity score matching was employed to balance demographics and comorbidities between PPI users and non-users. Postoperative PPI use was defined as continuous use for at least three months following surgery. Non-fusion was identified using ICD-10 code M96.0 at six months, one year, and two years post-surgery. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the risk of pseudarthrosis.

Results: The study included 3,857 PPI users and 4,4291 non-users, reduced to 3,847 in each group after propensity score matching. PPI users showed a significantly higher risk of non-fusion at six months (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.54-2.16), one year (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.78-2.44), and two years (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 2.01-2.71) compared to non-users.

Conclusion: The study indicates that postoperative PPI use is linked to a higher risk of non-fusion after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Clinicians may need to weigh the benefits of postoperative PPI use against its potential impact on bone healing.

质子泵抑制剂对单节段腰椎融合术后融合率的影响。
目的:腰椎融合手术是治疗脊柱退行性疾病的常用方法。虽然质子泵抑制剂(PPI)被广泛用于酸相关疾病,但新出现的证据表明,PPI的使用可能对骨骼健康产生负面影响,可能影响脊柱融合的结果。本研究评估了单节段腰椎融合手术后质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用对融合率的影响。方法:数据来自TriNetX平台上的全球协作网络。采用ICD和CPT代码对接受单节段腰椎融合的患者进行识别。倾向评分匹配用于平衡PPI使用者和非使用者之间的人口统计学和合并症。术后PPI使用定义为术后持续使用至少3个月。在术后6个月、1年和2年使用ICD-10代码M96.0识别不融合。计算优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)来评估假关节的风险。结果:本研究纳入了3,857名PPI使用者和4,4291名非PPI使用者,经过倾向评分匹配后,每组减少到3,847名。与非PPI使用者相比,PPI使用者在6个月(OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.54-2.16)、1年(OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.78-2.44)和2年(OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 2.01-2.71)发生不融合的风险明显更高。结论:该研究表明,术后使用PPI与腰椎融合术后不融合的风险较高有关。临床医生可能需要权衡术后使用PPI的益处及其对骨愈合的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信