Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Prediction and Diagnosis of Leptospirosis: Systematic Literature Review.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Suhila Sawesi, Arya Jadhav, Bushra Rashrash
{"title":"Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Prediction and Diagnosis of Leptospirosis: Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Suhila Sawesi, Arya Jadhav, Bushra Rashrash","doi":"10.2196/67859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leptospirosis, a zoonotic disease caused by Leptospira bacteria, continues to pose significant public health risks, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques in predicting and diagnosing leptospirosis, focusing on the most used algorithms, validation methods, data types, and performance metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS), and Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) tools, we conducted a comprehensive review of studies applying ML and DL models for leptospirosis detection and prediction, examining algorithm performance, data sources, and validation approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 374 articles screened, 17 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, representing approximately 4.5% of the initial pool. The review identified frequent use of algorithms such as support vector machines, artificial neural networks, decision trees, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Among the included studies, 88% (15/17) used traditional ML methods, and 24% (4/17) used DL techniques. Several models demonstrated high predictive performance, with reported accuracy rates ranging from 80% to 98%, notably with the U-Net CNN achieving 98.02% accuracy. However, public datasets were underused, with only 35% (6/17) of studies incorporating publicly available data sources; the majority (65%, 11/17) relied primarily on private datasets from hospitals, clinical records, or regional surveillance systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML and DL techniques demonstrate potential for improving leptospirosis prediction and diagnosis, but future research should focus on using larger, more diverse datasets, adopting transfer learning strategies, and integrating advanced ensemble and validation techniques to strengthen model accuracy and generalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"13 ","pages":"e67859"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Leptospirosis, a zoonotic disease caused by Leptospira bacteria, continues to pose significant public health risks, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques in predicting and diagnosing leptospirosis, focusing on the most used algorithms, validation methods, data types, and performance metrics.

Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS), and Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) tools, we conducted a comprehensive review of studies applying ML and DL models for leptospirosis detection and prediction, examining algorithm performance, data sources, and validation approaches.

Results: Out of a total of 374 articles screened, 17 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, representing approximately 4.5% of the initial pool. The review identified frequent use of algorithms such as support vector machines, artificial neural networks, decision trees, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Among the included studies, 88% (15/17) used traditional ML methods, and 24% (4/17) used DL techniques. Several models demonstrated high predictive performance, with reported accuracy rates ranging from 80% to 98%, notably with the U-Net CNN achieving 98.02% accuracy. However, public datasets were underused, with only 35% (6/17) of studies incorporating publicly available data sources; the majority (65%, 11/17) relied primarily on private datasets from hospitals, clinical records, or regional surveillance systems.

Conclusions: ML and DL techniques demonstrate potential for improving leptospirosis prediction and diagnosis, but future research should focus on using larger, more diverse datasets, adopting transfer learning strategies, and integrating advanced ensemble and validation techniques to strengthen model accuracy and generalization.

预测和诊断钩端螺旋体病的机器学习和深度学习技术:系统文献综述。
背景:钩端螺旋体病是一种由钩端螺旋体细菌引起的人畜共患疾病,继续构成重大的公共卫生风险,特别是在热带和亚热带地区。目的:本系统综述旨在评估机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)技术在预测和诊断钩端螺旋体病中的应用,重点关注最常用的算法、验证方法、数据类型和性能指标。方法:使用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南、预测建模研究系统评价关键评价和数据提取清单(CHARMS)和预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)工具,我们对应用ML和DL模型进行钩端螺旋体病检测和预测的研究进行了全面回顾,检查了算法性能、数据源和验证方法。结果:在筛选的374篇文章中,17篇研究被纳入定性综合,约占初始库的4.5%。该综述确定了常用的算法,如支持向量机、人工神经网络、决策树和卷积神经网络(cnn)。在纳入的研究中,88%(15/17)使用传统ML方法,24%(4/17)使用DL技术。有几个模型表现出了很高的预测性能,报道的准确率在80%到98%之间,特别是U-Net CNN达到了98.02%的准确率。然而,公共数据集未得到充分利用,只有35%(6/17)的研究纳入了公开可用的数据源;大多数(65%,11/17)主要依赖来自医院、临床记录或区域监测系统的私人数据集。结论:ML和DL技术显示出改善钩端螺旋体病预测和诊断的潜力,但未来的研究应侧重于使用更大、更多样化的数据集,采用迁移学习策略,并整合先进的集成和验证技术,以加强模型的准确性和泛化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信