Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study of an Oral Probiotic Intervention to Reduce Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant People by the Time of Birth
Katrina Nardini CNM, WHNP-BC, MPH, Lisa Hanson CNM, PhD, Noelle Borders CNM, DNP, Maharaj Singh PhD, Anna Shields CNM, DNP, FNP, Victoria Y. Trujillo BA, Robyn Lawton CNM, Emily Malloy CNM, PhD
{"title":"Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study of an Oral Probiotic Intervention to Reduce Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant People by the Time of Birth","authors":"Katrina Nardini CNM, WHNP-BC, MPH, Lisa Hanson CNM, PhD, Noelle Borders CNM, DNP, Maharaj Singh PhD, Anna Shields CNM, DNP, FNP, Victoria Y. Trujillo BA, Robyn Lawton CNM, Emily Malloy CNM, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this midwife-led study was to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of probiotics to reduce group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS) colonization by the time of birth in healthy, GBS-positive, pregnant adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An open-label randomized clinical trial comparing Florajen Digestion, a commercially available combination oral probiotic, with usual care (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04721912) was conducted in a midwifery practice serving a racially and ethnically diverse population. Eligible patients who tested positive for GBS at routine third-trimester screening were offered informed consent and participation. The primary outcome was feasibility for a larger RCT, including feasibility of probiotic use among participants. Secondary outcomes were intrapartum GBS colonization and Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Pregnancy (AP-GI-SA) scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 68 participants were enrolled and randomized; 65 participants completed the study, but only 46 had intrapartum cultures collected and processed. Among the 23 pregnant individuals who were eligible but chose not to participate, 3 indicated that they did not want to take a probiotic. After an average of 14 days of the intervention, 7 of 25 (28%) participants in the probiotic group had a negative intrapartum GBS result compared with 3 of 21 (14.3%) in the control group (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.52-10.48). There was no difference in perinatal outcomes or AP-GI-SA scores between groups. No adverse events occurred.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The feasibility of a larger RCT was demonstrated. Challenges identified included intrapartum GBS collection and laboratory processing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was not powered to detect a significant difference in intrapartum GBS colonization, although a larger decrease in GBS colonization was noted among probiotic-using participants. Florajen Digestion may show efficacy in a RCT with a longer intervention period. It is possible that the probiotic intervention duration was too brief to show a reduction in gastrointestinal pregnancy symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 3","pages":"460-467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13765","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The purpose of this midwife-led study was to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of probiotics to reduce group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization by the time of birth in healthy, GBS-positive, pregnant adults.
Methods
An open-label randomized clinical trial comparing Florajen Digestion, a commercially available combination oral probiotic, with usual care (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04721912) was conducted in a midwifery practice serving a racially and ethnically diverse population. Eligible patients who tested positive for GBS at routine third-trimester screening were offered informed consent and participation. The primary outcome was feasibility for a larger RCT, including feasibility of probiotic use among participants. Secondary outcomes were intrapartum GBS colonization and Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Pregnancy (AP-GI-SA) scores.
Results
A total of 68 participants were enrolled and randomized; 65 participants completed the study, but only 46 had intrapartum cultures collected and processed. Among the 23 pregnant individuals who were eligible but chose not to participate, 3 indicated that they did not want to take a probiotic. After an average of 14 days of the intervention, 7 of 25 (28%) participants in the probiotic group had a negative intrapartum GBS result compared with 3 of 21 (14.3%) in the control group (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.52-10.48). There was no difference in perinatal outcomes or AP-GI-SA scores between groups. No adverse events occurred.
Discussion
The feasibility of a larger RCT was demonstrated. Challenges identified included intrapartum GBS collection and laboratory processing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was not powered to detect a significant difference in intrapartum GBS colonization, although a larger decrease in GBS colonization was noted among probiotic-using participants. Florajen Digestion may show efficacy in a RCT with a longer intervention period. It is possible that the probiotic intervention duration was too brief to show a reduction in gastrointestinal pregnancy symptoms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed