The role of stakeholder mapping and engagement in Mongolia during the implementation of the STREAM clinical trial for MDR-TB.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-05-29 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08887-7
Bazarragchaa Tsogt, Meera Gurumurthy, Elisa Giallongo, Karen Sanders, Ganzorig Munkhjargal, Zayakhuu Khukhuukhen, Enkhjin Bolormaa, Enkhtuvshin Raash, Naranbat Nyamdavaa, Gay Bronson
{"title":"The role of stakeholder mapping and engagement in Mongolia during the implementation of the STREAM clinical trial for MDR-TB.","authors":"Bazarragchaa Tsogt, Meera Gurumurthy, Elisa Giallongo, Karen Sanders, Ganzorig Munkhjargal, Zayakhuu Khukhuukhen, Enkhjin Bolormaa, Enkhtuvshin Raash, Naranbat Nyamdavaa, Gay Bronson","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08887-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials evaluating new regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are typically conducted in multiple countries because global registration of new TB drugs requires evaluation in diverse populations. The complexity of multi-site trials makes implementation challenging, especially in lower-resource settings, where the burden of MDR-TB is highest. Stakeholder engagement can improve trial implementation and outcomes. Here, we describe the Mongolia site's stakeholder engagement during STREAM, a phase III clinical trial evaluating novel treatment regimens for MDR-TB.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>We assessed our stakeholder engagement against the PCORI rubric. Engagement at all phases of the trial aligned well with the PCORI engagement principles of reciprocal relationships; co-learning; building partnerships; and transparency, honesty, and trust. In the planning phase, we formed a key partnership with a civil society organization to co-lead the trial, undertook stakeholder mapping, and developed an overall engagement strategy. During trial implementation, we undertook activities aimed at ensuring feasibility of the study, improving recruitment, ensuring viability of the study, and ensuring authenticity/value of stakeholder engagement. Activities, which included continuous communication with the national TB program to ensure referral of potential trial participants, implementation of a comprehensive community engagement (CE) program, delivery in collaboration with partners of psychosocial support for trial participants, capacity-building and knowledge sharing, regular communications on trial developments and progress, and community advisory board (CAB) participation in CE assessment, contributed to achieving a 98% retention rate and the highest participant recruitment across all STREAM trial sites. In the dissemination phase, CAB members worked together with the site and sponsor to ensure strategies and materials were tailored to stakeholders' needs, including participants; communities; frontline healthworkers; and national-level stakeholders. Stakeholder participation in research and in improving routine TB care in the country has been sustained since completion of the trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant and sustainable gains can be made through stakeholder collaboration. We recommend that trial sites in lower-resourced settings take an expansive view of relevant stakeholders when planning engagement; undertake capacity-building and knowledge sharing; plan for long-term sustainability of CE; design engagement around specific objectives; tailor and optimize communication strategies; and design stakeholder engagement to involve key policy makers.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN78372190 - Registration date is October 14, 2010 (Stage 1) and ISRCTN18148631 - Registration date is February 10, 2016 (Stage 2).</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08887-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials evaluating new regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are typically conducted in multiple countries because global registration of new TB drugs requires evaluation in diverse populations. The complexity of multi-site trials makes implementation challenging, especially in lower-resource settings, where the burden of MDR-TB is highest. Stakeholder engagement can improve trial implementation and outcomes. Here, we describe the Mongolia site's stakeholder engagement during STREAM, a phase III clinical trial evaluating novel treatment regimens for MDR-TB.

Main body: We assessed our stakeholder engagement against the PCORI rubric. Engagement at all phases of the trial aligned well with the PCORI engagement principles of reciprocal relationships; co-learning; building partnerships; and transparency, honesty, and trust. In the planning phase, we formed a key partnership with a civil society organization to co-lead the trial, undertook stakeholder mapping, and developed an overall engagement strategy. During trial implementation, we undertook activities aimed at ensuring feasibility of the study, improving recruitment, ensuring viability of the study, and ensuring authenticity/value of stakeholder engagement. Activities, which included continuous communication with the national TB program to ensure referral of potential trial participants, implementation of a comprehensive community engagement (CE) program, delivery in collaboration with partners of psychosocial support for trial participants, capacity-building and knowledge sharing, regular communications on trial developments and progress, and community advisory board (CAB) participation in CE assessment, contributed to achieving a 98% retention rate and the highest participant recruitment across all STREAM trial sites. In the dissemination phase, CAB members worked together with the site and sponsor to ensure strategies and materials were tailored to stakeholders' needs, including participants; communities; frontline healthworkers; and national-level stakeholders. Stakeholder participation in research and in improving routine TB care in the country has been sustained since completion of the trial.

Conclusions: Significant and sustainable gains can be made through stakeholder collaboration. We recommend that trial sites in lower-resourced settings take an expansive view of relevant stakeholders when planning engagement; undertake capacity-building and knowledge sharing; plan for long-term sustainability of CE; design engagement around specific objectives; tailor and optimize communication strategies; and design stakeholder engagement to involve key policy makers.

Trial registration: ISRCTN78372190 - Registration date is October 14, 2010 (Stage 1) and ISRCTN18148631 - Registration date is February 10, 2016 (Stage 2).

在实施耐多药结核病STREAM临床试验期间,蒙古利益攸关方测绘和参与的作用。
背景:评估耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)新方案的临床试验通常在多个国家进行,因为结核病新药的全球注册需要在不同人群中进行评估。多地点试验的复杂性给实施工作带来了挑战,特别是在耐多药结核病负担最重的低资源环境中。利益相关者的参与可以改善试验的实施和结果。在此,我们描述了蒙古试验点在STREAM期间利益相关者的参与情况,STREAM是一项评估耐多药结核病新治疗方案的III期临床试验。主体:我们根据PCORI标准评估了涉众的参与情况。试验所有阶段的参与都符合PCORI互惠关系的参与原则;co-learning;建立伙伴关系;以及透明、诚实和信任。在规划阶段,我们与一个民间社会组织建立了重要的伙伴关系,共同领导试验,开展了利益相关者测绘工作,并制定了总体参与战略。在试验实施期间,我们开展了旨在确保研究的可行性,改善招募,确保研究的可行性,并确保利益相关者参与的真实性/价值的活动。活动包括与国家结核病规划持续沟通,以确保推荐潜在的试验参与者,实施全面的社区参与(CE)计划,与合作伙伴合作为试验参与者提供社会心理支持,能力建设和知识共享,定期就试验发展和进展进行沟通,以及社区咨询委员会(CAB)参与CE评估,促成了98%的保留率和所有STREAM试验站点中最高的参与者招募率。在传播阶段,CAB成员与网站和赞助商合作,确保战略和材料符合利益相关者(包括参与者)的需求;社区;前线的卫生工作者;以及国家层面的利益相关者。自试验完成以来,利益攸关方一直持续参与该国的研究和改善常规结核病治疗。结论:通过利益相关者的合作,可以取得显著和可持续的收益。我们建议资源匮乏地区的试验点在规划参与时广泛考虑相关利益相关者;开展能力建设和知识分享;行政长官的长远可持续发展计划;围绕特定目标设计参与;定制和优化传播策略;设计利益相关者参与,让关键政策制定者参与进来。试验注册:ISRCTN78372190 -注册日期为2010年10月14日(第一阶段)和ISRCTN18148631 -注册日期为2016年2月10日(第二阶段)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信