How does QI work? A trust-building framework in African healthcare: primary evidence from Kenya and Malawi.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mary B Adam, Naomi Wambui Makobu, Kedar Mate, Tod Newman, Angela Joy Donelson
{"title":"How does QI work? A trust-building framework in African healthcare: primary evidence from Kenya and Malawi.","authors":"Mary B Adam, Naomi Wambui Makobu, Kedar Mate, Tod Newman, Angela Joy Donelson","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trust is fundamental to the effective functioning of healthcare systems, influencing access, utilisation and adherence to evidence-based practices. While quality improvement (QI) processes are widely recognised for addressing technical challenges, their role in fostering trust and relationships within health systems remains underexplored. This study examines the relationship dynamics in QI teams and how trust-building frameworks align with adaptive processes in healthcare settings. We conducted a qualitative study involving 30 healthcare workers from six African countries, recruited through the Africa Consortium for Quality Improvement in Frontline Healthcare. Data were collected through semistructured interviews, transcribed and analysed using both inductive and deductive methods. Deductive analysis was guided by a published trust-building framework, while insights from a large language model were incorporated in addition to a traditional analysis to provide an unbiased perspective. Results identified three theoretically described dimensions of trust-building within QI teams: common goals, self-interest and gratitude/indebtedness. Common goals fostered teamwork, multidisciplinary collaboration and effective communication, while self-interest motivated personal and professional growth. Gratitude and recognition reinforced team cohesion and sustained motivation. Participants highlighted the importance of trust in achieving project success, noting that robust relationships within teams correlated with improved outcomes. The study underscores the dual nature of QI processes, which simultaneously address technical improvements and adaptive challenges, including trust and relationship-building. Trust-building, framed as an iterative process of aligning common goals, recognising contributions and addressing individual interests, complements technical QI methodologies like Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. These findings support expanding QI frameworks to emphasise relational dynamics, contributing to more sustainable and impactful healthcare improvements. Further research should continue to explore the adaptive dimensions of QI, integrating recent research on culturally relevant frameworks prioritising kindness in healthcare systems, to enhance trust and collaboration within healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trust is fundamental to the effective functioning of healthcare systems, influencing access, utilisation and adherence to evidence-based practices. While quality improvement (QI) processes are widely recognised for addressing technical challenges, their role in fostering trust and relationships within health systems remains underexplored. This study examines the relationship dynamics in QI teams and how trust-building frameworks align with adaptive processes in healthcare settings. We conducted a qualitative study involving 30 healthcare workers from six African countries, recruited through the Africa Consortium for Quality Improvement in Frontline Healthcare. Data were collected through semistructured interviews, transcribed and analysed using both inductive and deductive methods. Deductive analysis was guided by a published trust-building framework, while insights from a large language model were incorporated in addition to a traditional analysis to provide an unbiased perspective. Results identified three theoretically described dimensions of trust-building within QI teams: common goals, self-interest and gratitude/indebtedness. Common goals fostered teamwork, multidisciplinary collaboration and effective communication, while self-interest motivated personal and professional growth. Gratitude and recognition reinforced team cohesion and sustained motivation. Participants highlighted the importance of trust in achieving project success, noting that robust relationships within teams correlated with improved outcomes. The study underscores the dual nature of QI processes, which simultaneously address technical improvements and adaptive challenges, including trust and relationship-building. Trust-building, framed as an iterative process of aligning common goals, recognising contributions and addressing individual interests, complements technical QI methodologies like Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. These findings support expanding QI frameworks to emphasise relational dynamics, contributing to more sustainable and impactful healthcare improvements. Further research should continue to explore the adaptive dimensions of QI, integrating recent research on culturally relevant frameworks prioritising kindness in healthcare systems, to enhance trust and collaboration within healthcare systems.

QI是如何工作的?非洲卫生保健建立信任框架:来自肯尼亚和马拉维的初步证据。
信任是卫生保健系统有效运作的基础,影响着循证做法的获取、利用和遵守。虽然质量改进过程在解决技术挑战方面得到广泛认可,但它们在卫生系统内促进信任和关系方面的作用仍未得到充分探索。本研究考察了QI团队中的关系动态,以及信任建立框架如何与医疗保健环境中的自适应过程保持一致。我们进行了一项定性研究,涉及来自六个非洲国家的30名卫生保健工作者,他们是通过非洲前线卫生保健质量改进联盟招募的。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,使用归纳和演绎方法进行转录和分析。演绎分析以公开的信任构建框架为指导,而来自大型语言模型的见解除了传统分析之外,还被纳入其中,以提供公正的视角。结果确定了QI团队中信任建立的三个理论描述维度:共同目标、自身利益和感激/负债。共同的目标促进了团队合作、多学科合作和有效的沟通,而自身利益则促进了个人和职业的发展。感激和认可增强了团队凝聚力和持续的动力。与会者强调了信任对实现项目成功的重要性,并指出团队内部牢固的关系与改进的结果相关。该研究强调了QI过程的双重性质,它同时解决了技术改进和适应性挑战,包括信任和关系的建立。建立信任的框架是一个协调共同目标、认可贡献和解决个人利益的迭代过程,它补充了技术QI方法,如计划-执行-研究-行动循环。这些发现支持扩展QI框架以强调关系动态,从而促进更可持续和更有效的医疗保健改进。进一步的研究应继续探索QI的适应性维度,整合最近对医疗系统中优先考虑善良的文化相关框架的研究,以增强医疗系统内的信任和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信