Quality assurance of beam base data in modern radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo simulation approach.

IF 1.6 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Matthias Kowatsch, Eva Partoll, Thomas Künzler, Christian Attenberger, Philipp Szeverinski, Patrick Clemens, Peter Tschann
{"title":"Quality assurance of beam base data in modern radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo simulation approach.","authors":"Matthias Kowatsch, Eva Partoll, Thomas Künzler, Christian Attenberger, Philipp Szeverinski, Patrick Clemens, Peter Tschann","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/adde64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate dose computation in radiotherapy is critical due to the complexity of modern treatment modalities. Beam base data (BBD) underpin the precision of dose calculations in techniques such as Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Even minor discrepancies in BBD can compromise the accuracy of dose computations, necessitating quality assurance (QA). This study investigates the application of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, considered the 'gold standard' in dose calculations, for BBD QA using SciMoCa. SciMoCa is a Monte Carlo dose engine which shares its concepts with the VMC family of codes. A total of 87 BBD sets, from 39 datasets, representing diverse linacs, were analyzed, provided by the vendor of the MC-system. Systematic errors (e.g., dose, point dose, spectrum, output errors) were categorized into error classes: severe (Type 1), moderate (Type 2), minor (Type 3). Measurements were conducted using ionization chambers and diodes, and results were compared to MC simulations. The virtual source model was tested against measurements as a proof of concept, showing an overall deviation of less than 1%, with output factors differing by less than 0.3%. The analysis of the 87 BBD sets presented that 86% of BBD sets passed the criterions of Type 1 errors, 60% for Type 2 and 28% for Type 3 criteria. In absolute terms, 24 of the 87 BBD sets met the minimum criteria and would not compromise dose calculation in TPS. The study highlights the potential of MC simulations in establishing a standardized approach to BBD QA. This approach allows for robust validation of BBD quality and self-consistency, achieving typical precision within ±0.5%. In more challenging cases, the precision may expand to ±1.0%.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adde64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate dose computation in radiotherapy is critical due to the complexity of modern treatment modalities. Beam base data (BBD) underpin the precision of dose calculations in techniques such as Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Even minor discrepancies in BBD can compromise the accuracy of dose computations, necessitating quality assurance (QA). This study investigates the application of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, considered the 'gold standard' in dose calculations, for BBD QA using SciMoCa. SciMoCa is a Monte Carlo dose engine which shares its concepts with the VMC family of codes. A total of 87 BBD sets, from 39 datasets, representing diverse linacs, were analyzed, provided by the vendor of the MC-system. Systematic errors (e.g., dose, point dose, spectrum, output errors) were categorized into error classes: severe (Type 1), moderate (Type 2), minor (Type 3). Measurements were conducted using ionization chambers and diodes, and results were compared to MC simulations. The virtual source model was tested against measurements as a proof of concept, showing an overall deviation of less than 1%, with output factors differing by less than 0.3%. The analysis of the 87 BBD sets presented that 86% of BBD sets passed the criterions of Type 1 errors, 60% for Type 2 and 28% for Type 3 criteria. In absolute terms, 24 of the 87 BBD sets met the minimum criteria and would not compromise dose calculation in TPS. The study highlights the potential of MC simulations in establishing a standardized approach to BBD QA. This approach allows for robust validation of BBD quality and self-consistency, achieving typical precision within ±0.5%. In more challenging cases, the precision may expand to ±1.0%.

现代放射治疗中束基数据的质量保证:一种蒙特卡罗模拟方法。
由于现代治疗方式的复杂性,精确的剂量计算在放射治疗中至关重要。束流基础数据(BBD)支持诸如体积调制弧线治疗(VMAT)、调强放射治疗(IMRT)、立体定向放射外科(SRS)和立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)等技术中剂量计算的精度。即使BBD的微小差异也会影响剂量计算的准确性,因此需要质量保证(QA)。蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟被认为是剂量计算中的“金标准”,本研究探讨了蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟在使用SciMoCa进行BBD QA中的应用。SciMoCa是一个蒙特卡罗剂量引擎,它与VMC家族的代码共享其概念。我们分析了MC-system供应商提供的来自39个数据集的87个BBD集,这些数据集代表了不同的直线。系统误差(如剂量、点剂量、谱、输出误差)被划分为误差等级:严重(类型1)、中度(类型2)、轻微(类型3)。使用电离室和二极管进行了测量,并将结果与MC模拟进行了比较。 ;虚拟源模型与测量结果进行了测试,作为概念验证,显示总体偏差小于1%,输出因子差异小于0.3%。 ;对87台BBD机组的分析表明,86%的BBD机组通过了1型误差标准,60%通过了2型误差标准,28%通过了3型误差标准。从绝对意义上讲,87套BBD中有24套符合最低标准,不会影响TPS中的剂量计算。该研究强调了MC模拟在建立BBD质量保证标准化方法方面的潜力。该方法允许对BBD质量和自一致性进行稳健验证,达到±0.5%的典型精度。在更具挑战性的情况下,精度可以扩展到±1.0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信