A Comparative Study Between Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Block Combined With Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee Block versus Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Replacement.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/anrp/8937826
Marwa M Abouseeda, Mohamed Mohsen Rashed, Mostafa M Hussein, Riham F Nady, Ahmad M Ehab
{"title":"A Comparative Study Between Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Block Combined With Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee Block versus Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Replacement.","authors":"Marwa M Abouseeda, Mohamed Mohsen Rashed, Mostafa M Hussein, Riham F Nady, Ahmad M Ehab","doi":"10.1155/anrp/8937826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical intervention that relieves patients experiencing severe pain and joint dysfunction. <b>Objective:</b> The aim is to evaluate ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block (GNB) paired with infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee IPACK block in comparison with adductor canal block (ACB) regarding the analgesia effectiveness and postoperative functional outcomes and rehabilitation parameters for TKA. <b>Methods:</b> This randomized controlled trial enrolled 50 individuals of both genders with American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III, planned for TKA with spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 25 each. Group A underwent an ultrasound-guided GNB combined with an IPACK block, while Group B received an ACB. The amount of morphine consumed postoperatively during the initial 48 h was the main outcome. Additional outcomes encompassed postoperative knee range of motion (ROM), straight leg raising (SLR), and time up and go (TUG) test. <b>Results:</b> Group A patients exhibited significantly lower pain perception scores at 6 and 12 h (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower 48 h morphine dose in comparison to Group B (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Group A had significantly better results in ROM and TUG tests on the first and second days (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in patients achieving SLR on Day 1 (<i>p</i>=0.999). Overall, Group A had a faster recovery regarding ROM and TUG and better SLR by Day 2. Group A had better satisfaction. <b>Conclusions:</b> In TKA, combined IPACK and GNB offer superior postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid use, and improved functional outcomes compared to ACB. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06423339.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8937826"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/8937826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical intervention that relieves patients experiencing severe pain and joint dysfunction. Objective: The aim is to evaluate ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block (GNB) paired with infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee IPACK block in comparison with adductor canal block (ACB) regarding the analgesia effectiveness and postoperative functional outcomes and rehabilitation parameters for TKA. Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 50 individuals of both genders with American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III, planned for TKA with spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 25 each. Group A underwent an ultrasound-guided GNB combined with an IPACK block, while Group B received an ACB. The amount of morphine consumed postoperatively during the initial 48 h was the main outcome. Additional outcomes encompassed postoperative knee range of motion (ROM), straight leg raising (SLR), and time up and go (TUG) test. Results: Group A patients exhibited significantly lower pain perception scores at 6 and 12 h (p < 0.001) and lower 48 h morphine dose in comparison to Group B (p < 0.001). Group A had significantly better results in ROM and TUG tests on the first and second days (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in patients achieving SLR on Day 1 (p=0.999). Overall, Group A had a faster recovery regarding ROM and TUG and better SLR by Day 2. Group A had better satisfaction. Conclusions: In TKA, combined IPACK and GNB offer superior postoperative analgesia, reduced opioid use, and improved functional outcomes compared to ACB. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06423339.

超声引导膝神经阻滞联合腘动脉与膝后囊间隙阻滞与内收管阻滞在全膝关节置换术中的比较研究。
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)是一种外科干预,减轻患者经历严重疼痛和关节功能障碍。目的:评价超声引导膝神经阻滞(GNB)联合膝后动脉与膝后囊间浸润IPACK阻滞与内收管阻滞(ACB)对TKA的镇痛效果、术后功能结局及康复参数的影响。方法:本随机对照试验招募了50名男女,均为美国麻醉师学会I-III级会员,计划进行脊柱麻醉TKA。患者被随机分为两组,每组25人。A组行超声引导GNB联合IPACK阻滞,B组行ACB。术后48小时吗啡用量是主要观察指标。其他结果包括术后膝关节活动范围(ROM)、直腿抬高(SLR)和时间up and go (TUG)测试。结果:A组患者疼痛感知评分在6、12 h显著低于B组(p < 0.001), 48 h吗啡剂量显著低于B组(p < 0.001)。A组在第1天和第2天的ROM和TUG测试结果明显更好(p < 0.001)。患者在第1天达到SLR无显著差异(p=0.999)。总的来说,到第2天,A组在ROM和TUG方面恢复得更快,单反也更好。A组满意度较高。结论:与ACB相比,在TKA中,IPACK和GNB联合提供了更好的术后镇痛,减少了阿片类药物的使用,改善了功能结果。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06423339。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信