Analyzing post-quantum cryptographic algorithms efficiency for transport security layer

IF 4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Sana Farooq , Ayesha Altaf , Muhammad Shoaib , Faiza Iqbal , Nagwan Abdel Samee , Manal Abdullah Alohali , Imran Ashraf
{"title":"Analyzing post-quantum cryptographic algorithms efficiency for transport security layer","authors":"Sana Farooq ,&nbsp;Ayesha Altaf ,&nbsp;Muhammad Shoaib ,&nbsp;Faiza Iqbal ,&nbsp;Nagwan Abdel Samee ,&nbsp;Manal Abdullah Alohali ,&nbsp;Imran Ashraf","doi":"10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of post-quantum computing has increasingly put at risk the viability of classical public-key cryptographic schemes. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is actively working on standardizing post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms, and this research assesses the performance of two fourth-round finalists: BIKE and Classic McEliece, within the Transport Layer Security (TLS) context. With OQS’s OpenSSL implementation, we benchmark key generation, encapsulation, decapsulation, and TLS handshake latency across multiple algorithm variants and operating systems. Our results illustrate that BIKE-L1 demonstrates the lowest TLS handshake latency of 6 ms and performs well on Linux, positioning it as optimal for secure communication when minimal delay is needed. In contrast, the Classic McEliece variants provide robust encryption security but have large key sizes coupled with high computational burdens, especially on Windows systems. These results inform the selection of PQC algorithms based on the limitations of the implementation platform, outline the objectives for the operation efficiency of algorithms, and help guide future research focused on optimization and deployment within real-world cryptographic systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50630,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Electrical Engineering","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 110437"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045790625003805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of post-quantum computing has increasingly put at risk the viability of classical public-key cryptographic schemes. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is actively working on standardizing post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms, and this research assesses the performance of two fourth-round finalists: BIKE and Classic McEliece, within the Transport Layer Security (TLS) context. With OQS’s OpenSSL implementation, we benchmark key generation, encapsulation, decapsulation, and TLS handshake latency across multiple algorithm variants and operating systems. Our results illustrate that BIKE-L1 demonstrates the lowest TLS handshake latency of 6 ms and performs well on Linux, positioning it as optimal for secure communication when minimal delay is needed. In contrast, the Classic McEliece variants provide robust encryption security but have large key sizes coupled with high computational burdens, especially on Windows systems. These results inform the selection of PQC algorithms based on the limitations of the implementation platform, outline the objectives for the operation efficiency of algorithms, and help guide future research focused on optimization and deployment within real-world cryptographic systems.
传输安全层后量子加密算法效率分析
后量子计算的发展日益危及经典公钥加密方案的可行性。美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)正在积极致力于后量子密码学(PQC)算法的标准化,本研究评估了两个第四轮决赛入围者:BIKE和Classic McEliece在传输层安全(TLS)环境中的性能。通过OQS的OpenSSL实现,我们对多个算法变体和操作系统之间的密钥生成、封装、解封装和TLS握手延迟进行了基准测试。我们的结果表明,BIKE-L1显示了最低的TLS握手延迟为6 ms,并且在Linux上表现良好,当需要最小延迟时,它是安全通信的最佳选择。相比之下,经典的McEliece变体提供了强大的加密安全性,但密钥大小大,计算负担高,特别是在Windows系统上。这些结果为基于实现平台的局限性选择PQC算法提供了信息,概述了算法运行效率的目标,并有助于指导未来在现实密码系统中进行优化和部署的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Electrical Engineering
Computers & Electrical Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
661
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The impact of computers has nowhere been more revolutionary than in electrical engineering. The design, analysis, and operation of electrical and electronic systems are now dominated by computers, a transformation that has been motivated by the natural ease of interface between computers and electrical systems, and the promise of spectacular improvements in speed and efficiency. Published since 1973, Computers & Electrical Engineering provides rapid publication of topical research into the integration of computer technology and computational techniques with electrical and electronic systems. The journal publishes papers featuring novel implementations of computers and computational techniques in areas like signal and image processing, high-performance computing, parallel processing, and communications. Special attention will be paid to papers describing innovative architectures, algorithms, and software tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信