Epidemiologic Characteristics and Management of Sepsis Among Previously Healthy Patients

Rachel K. Hechtman MD , Megan E. Heath PhD , Jennifer K. Horowitz MA , Elizabeth McLaughlin MS, RN , Patricia J. Posa RN, BSN, MSA, CCRN , John Blamoun MD , Paul Bozyk MD , Megan Cahill DO, MBA, FACOEP , Rania Esteitie MD, FCCP, ATSF , Kevin Furlong DO , Namita Jayaprakash MB, BcH BAO, MRCEM , Jessica Jones PharmD , Maximiliano Tamae-Kakazu MD , Joan Nagelkirk MD , Thomas Pfotenhauer DO , Derek C. Angus MD, MPH, FRCP , Scott A. Flanders MD , Elizabeth S. Munroe MD , Hallie C. Prescott MD
{"title":"Epidemiologic Characteristics and Management of Sepsis Among Previously Healthy Patients","authors":"Rachel K. Hechtman MD ,&nbsp;Megan E. Heath PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer K. Horowitz MA ,&nbsp;Elizabeth McLaughlin MS, RN ,&nbsp;Patricia J. Posa RN, BSN, MSA, CCRN ,&nbsp;John Blamoun MD ,&nbsp;Paul Bozyk MD ,&nbsp;Megan Cahill DO, MBA, FACOEP ,&nbsp;Rania Esteitie MD, FCCP, ATSF ,&nbsp;Kevin Furlong DO ,&nbsp;Namita Jayaprakash MB, BcH BAO, MRCEM ,&nbsp;Jessica Jones PharmD ,&nbsp;Maximiliano Tamae-Kakazu MD ,&nbsp;Joan Nagelkirk MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Pfotenhauer DO ,&nbsp;Derek C. Angus MD, MPH, FRCP ,&nbsp;Scott A. Flanders MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Munroe MD ,&nbsp;Hallie C. Prescott MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most deaths resulting from sepsis occur among patients with advanced age, multiple morbidities, or frailty. It is unclear how many sepsis-related deaths truly are preventable. Previously healthy patients may provide insight into preventable sepsis mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What are the baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes associated with previously healthy patients with sepsis?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort of patients hospitalized for community-onset sepsis at 66 Michigan hospitals (November 2020-January 2024). We developed major and minor criteria to classify patients as previously healthy vs having significant comorbidities. We compared baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes of previously healthy patients vs patients with comorbid sepsis. Physicians reviewed charts of previously healthy patients with in-hospital death to evaluate baseline health status and rate preventability of death.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 29,688 patients hospitalized for sepsis, 2,963 patients (10.0%) were classified as previously healthy. Previously healthy patients had median age of 53 years, a median of 2 minor comorbidities, and lower in-hospital mortality (5.8% vs 12.7%; <em>P</em> &lt; .01) vs comorbid patients. Delivery of guideline-recommended early sepsis management ranged from 56.8% to 80.9% across individual care practices. Several care practices were less common among previously healthy patients, including lactate measurement (67.5% vs 73.8%; <em>P</em> &lt; .01) and timely antibiotic administration (58.0% vs 66.3%; <em>P</em> &lt; .01), whereas some were more common, including ≥ 30 mL/kg fluid resuscitation (72.4% vs 55.3%; <em>P</em> &lt; .01). Among 48 charts of previously healthy decedents reviewed, 77.1% of patients were deemed to have life expectancy &gt; 5 years without sepsis. Most deaths were judged to be unpreventable because of severity of illness on presentation.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>We found that 1 in 10 patients with community-onset sepsis was healthy previously. Although gaps in in-hospital management were identified, deaths among previously healthy patients generally were deemed unpreventable with better in-hospital management because of patients seeking treatment too late in the course of sepsis. This study highlights system-level opportunities for better recognition and triage of sepsis before hospitalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788425000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Most deaths resulting from sepsis occur among patients with advanced age, multiple morbidities, or frailty. It is unclear how many sepsis-related deaths truly are preventable. Previously healthy patients may provide insight into preventable sepsis mortality.

Research Question

What are the baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes associated with previously healthy patients with sepsis?

Study Design and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort of patients hospitalized for community-onset sepsis at 66 Michigan hospitals (November 2020-January 2024). We developed major and minor criteria to classify patients as previously healthy vs having significant comorbidities. We compared baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes of previously healthy patients vs patients with comorbid sepsis. Physicians reviewed charts of previously healthy patients with in-hospital death to evaluate baseline health status and rate preventability of death.

Results

Of 29,688 patients hospitalized for sepsis, 2,963 patients (10.0%) were classified as previously healthy. Previously healthy patients had median age of 53 years, a median of 2 minor comorbidities, and lower in-hospital mortality (5.8% vs 12.7%; P < .01) vs comorbid patients. Delivery of guideline-recommended early sepsis management ranged from 56.8% to 80.9% across individual care practices. Several care practices were less common among previously healthy patients, including lactate measurement (67.5% vs 73.8%; P < .01) and timely antibiotic administration (58.0% vs 66.3%; P < .01), whereas some were more common, including ≥ 30 mL/kg fluid resuscitation (72.4% vs 55.3%; P < .01). Among 48 charts of previously healthy decedents reviewed, 77.1% of patients were deemed to have life expectancy > 5 years without sepsis. Most deaths were judged to be unpreventable because of severity of illness on presentation.

Interpretation

We found that 1 in 10 patients with community-onset sepsis was healthy previously. Although gaps in in-hospital management were identified, deaths among previously healthy patients generally were deemed unpreventable with better in-hospital management because of patients seeking treatment too late in the course of sepsis. This study highlights system-level opportunities for better recognition and triage of sepsis before hospitalization.
先前健康患者败血症的流行病学特征和处理
背景:大多数败血症导致的死亡发生在高龄、多重发病或虚弱的患者中。目前尚不清楚有多少败血症相关的死亡是真正可以预防的。以前健康的患者可能提供可预防的败血症死亡率的见解。研究问题:先前健康的败血症患者的基线特征、管理和结局是什么?研究设计和方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2020年11月至2024年1月期间在密歇根州66家医院因社区发病败血症住院的患者。我们制定了主要和次要标准,将患者分为以前健康的和有显著合并症的。我们比较了既往健康患者与合并败血症患者的基线特征、管理和结局。医生回顾了先前健康的住院死亡患者的图表,以评估基线健康状况和死亡率的可预防性。结果29688例败血症住院患者中,2963例(10.0%)既往健康。既往健康患者的中位年龄为53岁,中位有2个轻微合并症,住院死亡率较低(5.8% vs 12.7%;P & lt;.01) vs合并症患者。在个人护理实践中,指南推荐的早期败血症管理的交付率从56.8%到80.9%不等。一些护理措施在以前健康的患者中不太常见,包括乳酸测量(67.5% vs 73.8%;P & lt;.01)和及时给药(58.0% vs 66.3%;P & lt;.01),而有些更为常见,包括≥30 mL/kg液体复苏(72.4% vs 55.3%;P & lt;. 01)。在48个先前健康的死者的图表中,77.1%的患者被认为有预期寿命>;5年无脓毒症。由于病情严重,大多数死亡被认为是不可预防的。我们发现,1 / 10的社区性败血症患者以前是健康的。虽然发现了院内管理方面的差距,但由于患者在败血症过程中寻求治疗太晚,先前健康患者的死亡通常被认为是无法通过更好的院内管理来预防的。这项研究强调了在住院前更好地识别和分类败血症的系统级机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信