An integrated MCDM approach to evaluating global and regional airline performance

Kasım Kiracı
{"title":"An integrated MCDM approach to evaluating global and regional airline performance","authors":"Kasım Kiracı","doi":"10.1016/j.team.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Airlines are the fundamental components of air transportation, which plays a critical role in global transportation. The study evaluates airlines' performance using the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. The implementation is conducted through an MCDM model. We analyse the financial, risk, and sustainability performance of 30 airlines for the period 2018–2022. The criteria weights were determined using 23 criteria grouped under seven dimensions with the LOPCOW method, and the alternatives were ranked using the TOPSIS method. This study enables a multi-dimensional assessment of airline performance by integrating two dimensions and four criteria related to sustainability and risk into the evaluation framework. Therefore, this study is the first attempt in the literature to simultaneously consider risk factors and multiple environmental criteria. In addition, the performance rankings of the airlines were compared based on their respective regions. The findings reveal that airline performance rankings follows distinct patterns. These patterns were classified into two categories: <em>V-shaped</em> and <em>∧-shaped</em>. Furthermore, the findings highlighted significant differences in airline performance rankings at the regional level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101258,"journal":{"name":"Transport Economics and Management","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 222-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949899625000152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Airlines are the fundamental components of air transportation, which plays a critical role in global transportation. The study evaluates airlines' performance using the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. The implementation is conducted through an MCDM model. We analyse the financial, risk, and sustainability performance of 30 airlines for the period 2018–2022. The criteria weights were determined using 23 criteria grouped under seven dimensions with the LOPCOW method, and the alternatives were ranked using the TOPSIS method. This study enables a multi-dimensional assessment of airline performance by integrating two dimensions and four criteria related to sustainability and risk into the evaluation framework. Therefore, this study is the first attempt in the literature to simultaneously consider risk factors and multiple environmental criteria. In addition, the performance rankings of the airlines were compared based on their respective regions. The findings reveal that airline performance rankings follows distinct patterns. These patterns were classified into two categories: V-shaped and ∧-shaped. Furthermore, the findings highlighted significant differences in airline performance rankings at the regional level.
综合MCDM方法来评估全球和区域航空公司的绩效
航空公司是航空运输的基本组成部分,在全球运输中起着至关重要的作用。该研究使用多标准决策(MCDM)方法评估航空公司的绩效。实现是通过MCDM模型进行的。我们分析了30家航空公司在2018-2022年期间的财务、风险和可持续性表现。采用LOPCOW法对7个维度下的23个指标进行权重排序,并采用TOPSIS法对备选方案进行排序。本研究通过将与可持续性和风险相关的两个维度和四个标准整合到评估框架中,实现了对航空公司绩效的多维评估。因此,本研究在文献中首次尝试同时考虑危险因素和多个环境标准。此外,还比较了各航空公司在各自地区的表现排名。调查结果显示,航空公司的业绩排名遵循不同的模式。这些模式可分为v型和∧型两类。此外,调查结果还强调了航空公司在地区层面上表现排名的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信