Adapting segment anything model for hematoma segmentation in traumatic brain injury.

Discover imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1007/s44352-025-00011-4
Lingrui Cai, Craig Williamson, Andrew Nguyen, Emily Wittrup, Kayvan Najarian
{"title":"Adapting segment anything model for hematoma segmentation in traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Lingrui Cai, Craig Williamson, Andrew Nguyen, Emily Wittrup, Kayvan Najarian","doi":"10.1007/s44352-025-00011-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hematoma segmentation in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is critical for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. In this study, we evaluate various automated segmentation models, including stat-of-the-art architecture as benchmarks, and compare their performance with our proposed SAM-Adapter method for segmenting hematomas in brain CT scans. By incorporating the adapter into the vanilla SAM model, we address the challenges in medical imaging, which has very limited annotated datasets, enhancing model performance efficiency. We also find that domain-specific pre-processing, such as contrast adjustment, reduces the need for extensive pretraining, making the model more streamlined. And the model performance benefited with optimization and hyperparameter tuning. Our results demonstrate that the SAM-Adapter model achieved strong performance and reliability in identifying hematomas with Dice (72.34%), IoU (59.78%), 95% HD (5.57), sensitivity (75.39%) and specificity (99.73%). Inter-observer variability was assessed, revealing that the model's performance Dice (67.20%) was closely aligned with human expert agreement Dice (63.79%), suggesting its potential clinical utility. The external validation on the HemSeg-200 dataset, which contains 222 scans, demonstrates the robustness of our approach across diverse cases. These advancements in automatic segmentation hold promise for improving the accuracy and efficiency of TBI diagnosis, supporting clinical decision-making, and enhancing patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44352-025-00011-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":520461,"journal":{"name":"Discover imaging","volume":"2 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44352-025-00011-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hematoma segmentation in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is critical for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. In this study, we evaluate various automated segmentation models, including stat-of-the-art architecture as benchmarks, and compare their performance with our proposed SAM-Adapter method for segmenting hematomas in brain CT scans. By incorporating the adapter into the vanilla SAM model, we address the challenges in medical imaging, which has very limited annotated datasets, enhancing model performance efficiency. We also find that domain-specific pre-processing, such as contrast adjustment, reduces the need for extensive pretraining, making the model more streamlined. And the model performance benefited with optimization and hyperparameter tuning. Our results demonstrate that the SAM-Adapter model achieved strong performance and reliability in identifying hematomas with Dice (72.34%), IoU (59.78%), 95% HD (5.57), sensitivity (75.39%) and specificity (99.73%). Inter-observer variability was assessed, revealing that the model's performance Dice (67.20%) was closely aligned with human expert agreement Dice (63.79%), suggesting its potential clinical utility. The external validation on the HemSeg-200 dataset, which contains 222 scans, demonstrates the robustness of our approach across diverse cases. These advancements in automatic segmentation hold promise for improving the accuracy and efficiency of TBI diagnosis, supporting clinical decision-making, and enhancing patient outcomes.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44352-025-00011-4.

应用分段任意模型进行颅脑外伤血肿分割。
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的血肿分割对于准确诊断和制定有效的治疗方案至关重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了各种自动分割模型,包括最先进的架构作为基准,并将它们的性能与我们提出的SAM-Adapter方法进行比较,以分割脑部CT扫描中的血肿。通过将适配器集成到普通SAM模型中,我们解决了医学成像中具有非常有限的注释数据集的挑战,提高了模型的性能效率。我们还发现,特定领域的预处理,如对比度调整,减少了大量预训练的需要,使模型更加精简。优化和超参数调优使模型性能得到改善。结果表明,SAM-Adapter模型对血肿的识别具有较强的性能和可靠性,分别为Dice(72.34%)、IoU(59.78%)、HD(95%)、敏感性(75.39%)和特异性(99.73%)。评估了观察者间的可变性,显示模型的性能Dice(67.20%)与人类专家协议Dice(63.79%)密切一致,表明其潜在的临床应用。对包含222次扫描的HemSeg-200数据集的外部验证证明了我们的方法在不同情况下的稳健性。这些在自动分割方面的进步有望提高TBI诊断的准确性和效率,支持临床决策,并提高患者的治疗效果。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s44352-025-00011-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信