Revascularization strategies in acute stroke with tandem occlusions: The Impact of Dissection vs. Atherosclerotic etiology on Clinical Outcomes

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Mara Z. Thut , Gregory Howaldt , Miklos Krepuska , Patrick Thurner , Jawid Madjidyar , Susanne Wegener , Christoph Globas , Andreas R. Luft , Tilman Schubert , Zsolt Kulcsar
{"title":"Revascularization strategies in acute stroke with tandem occlusions: The Impact of Dissection vs. Atherosclerotic etiology on Clinical Outcomes","authors":"Mara Z. Thut ,&nbsp;Gregory Howaldt ,&nbsp;Miklos Krepuska ,&nbsp;Patrick Thurner ,&nbsp;Jawid Madjidyar ,&nbsp;Susanne Wegener ,&nbsp;Christoph Globas ,&nbsp;Andreas R. Luft ,&nbsp;Tilman Schubert ,&nbsp;Zsolt Kulcsar","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div>The endovascular treatment for tandem occlusion (TO) in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke represents a major challenge. Tandem occlusion involves an intracranial large vessel occlusion combined with a simultaneous occlusion or high-grade stenosis of the ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid artery. Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease (ACAD) and carotid artery dissection (CAD) are the primary causes. This study aims to assess the effect of etiology on clinical and radiological features, patient outcomes, and complications after revascularization procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed analyzing TO patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting at our comprehensive stroke center from January 2019 to July 2023. The study was conducted using chart review and angiogram analysis. Successful reperfusion, peri‑procedural complications, and functional independence at 90 days were collected as outcome measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 89 patients, 22 were CAD patients, and 67 were associated with ACAD. CAD patients were significantly younger with a mean age of 55 years compared to 74 years for patients with ACAD (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, CAD patients exhibited fewer cardiovascular risk factors. Complete revascularization was achieved at a significantly higher rate in CAD patients (72.7 % vs. 40.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.003). At 90 days post-procedure, CAD patients demonstrated a higher incidence of favorable outcomes (68.2 % vs. 43.2 %, <em>p</em> = 0.038). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age as a significant predictor of outcomes (OR = 0.905, 95 % CI: 0.851-0.962, <em>p</em> = 0.001), whereas etiology did not show a statistically significant effect. Furthermore, ACAD patients exhibited a lower incidence of stent occlusion at hospital discharge (3.4 % vs. 25.0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.004).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study on tandem occlusions found that patients with carotid dissection experienced better clinical outcomes than those with atherosclerotic carotid disease, despite a higher rate of stent reocclusion. However, multivariate analysis indicated that the underlying etiology was not an independent predictor of outcome; instead, patient age and initial stroke severity were more influential factors. Given the increased risk of reocclusion, patients with carotid dissection may benefit from a more individualized antithrombotic strategy to maintain stent patency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 8","pages":"Article 108362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305725001405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

The endovascular treatment for tandem occlusion (TO) in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke represents a major challenge. Tandem occlusion involves an intracranial large vessel occlusion combined with a simultaneous occlusion or high-grade stenosis of the ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid artery. Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease (ACAD) and carotid artery dissection (CAD) are the primary causes. This study aims to assess the effect of etiology on clinical and radiological features, patient outcomes, and complications after revascularization procedures.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed analyzing TO patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting at our comprehensive stroke center from January 2019 to July 2023. The study was conducted using chart review and angiogram analysis. Successful reperfusion, peri‑procedural complications, and functional independence at 90 days were collected as outcome measures.

Results

Among the 89 patients, 22 were CAD patients, and 67 were associated with ACAD. CAD patients were significantly younger with a mean age of 55 years compared to 74 years for patients with ACAD (p < 0.001). Additionally, CAD patients exhibited fewer cardiovascular risk factors. Complete revascularization was achieved at a significantly higher rate in CAD patients (72.7 % vs. 40.3 %, p = 0.003). At 90 days post-procedure, CAD patients demonstrated a higher incidence of favorable outcomes (68.2 % vs. 43.2 %, p = 0.038). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age as a significant predictor of outcomes (OR = 0.905, 95 % CI: 0.851-0.962, p = 0.001), whereas etiology did not show a statistically significant effect. Furthermore, ACAD patients exhibited a lower incidence of stent occlusion at hospital discharge (3.4 % vs. 25.0 %, p = 0.004).

Conclusion

This study on tandem occlusions found that patients with carotid dissection experienced better clinical outcomes than those with atherosclerotic carotid disease, despite a higher rate of stent reocclusion. However, multivariate analysis indicated that the underlying etiology was not an independent predictor of outcome; instead, patient age and initial stroke severity were more influential factors. Given the increased risk of reocclusion, patients with carotid dissection may benefit from a more individualized antithrombotic strategy to maintain stent patency.
急性脑卒中串联闭塞的血运重建策略:夹层与动脉粥样硬化病因学对临床结果的影响。
背景与目的:血管内治疗前循环急性缺血性脑卒中串联闭塞(TO)是一项重大挑战。串联闭塞包括颅内大血管闭塞合并同侧颅外颈内动脉同时闭塞或高度狭窄。颈动脉粥样硬化性疾病(ACAD)和颈动脉夹层(CAD)是主要原因。本研究旨在评估病因对临床和放射学特征、患者预后和血运重建术后并发症的影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2023年7月在我院脑卒中综合中心行机械取栓和经皮腔内血管成形术及支架置入术的TO患者。本研究通过图表回顾和血管造影分析进行。收集90天的再灌注成功、术中并发症和功能独立性作为结局指标。结果:89例患者中,CAD患者22例,合并ACAD患者67例,CAD患者明显年轻,平均年龄为55岁,而ACAD患者平均年龄为74岁(p结论:这项关于串联闭塞的研究发现,颈动脉夹层患者的临床结果优于颈动脉粥样硬化性疾病患者,尽管支架再闭塞率更高。然而,多变量分析表明,潜在的病因并不是预后的独立预测因素;相反,患者年龄和初始中风严重程度是更重要的影响因素。考虑到再闭塞的风险增加,颈动脉夹层患者可能受益于更个体化的抗血栓策略来维持支架通畅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信