A Theory-Based Model for Predicting Adherence to Guidelines for Screening Mammography among Women Age 40 and Older.

Saleh M M Rahman, Mark B Dignan, Brent J Shelton
{"title":"A Theory-Based Model for Predicting Adherence to Guidelines for Screening Mammography among Women Age 40 and Older.","authors":"Saleh M M Rahman, Mark B Dignan, Brent J Shelton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To examine theory-based selected factors associated with adherence to mammography screening guidelines in a surveillance database. METHODS: Data from Colorado Mammography Project (CMAP) from 1994-1998 was extracted and analyzed by using SAS statistical software. Based on the Health Belief Model and Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization a prediction model was developed to examine the mammography utilization patterns and factors influencing the adherence to screening guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 27,778 women, 41.4% were adherent with mammography screening guidelines. According to the model tested in this study, race/ethnicity (Black vs White, OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.64-0.91); educational attainment (high school vs < high school, OR= 1.10, 95% CI= 1.04-1.18), college graduate vs < high school (OR=1.33, 95% CI=1.25-1.42); insurance status, (any coverage vs no coverage (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.25-2.12); and community economic status as defined by median income by zip code of residence ($15,000-$24,999 vs <$15,000, OR=0.84, 95% CI=0.76-0.94; >$55,000 vs <$15,000, OR 1.14, 95% CI=1.03-1.26) were statistically significant predictors of adherence to guidelines. Interaction between age and family history of breast cancer was statically significant. Younger females with a family history of breast cancer were less likely to be adherent than their counterparts without a family history (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.90-0.96). Inclusion or exclusion of women aged 70 years and older did not change the outcome of the analysis. CONCLUSION: The prediction model variables such as race/ethnicity, age and family history of breast cancer, educational level and community economic status, are associated with adherence status. Family history of breast cancer needs to be examined very carefully in future studies as it may play negative role in adherence to screening mammography.</p>","PeriodicalId":87998,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cancer prevention","volume":"2 3","pages":"169-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cancer prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine theory-based selected factors associated with adherence to mammography screening guidelines in a surveillance database. METHODS: Data from Colorado Mammography Project (CMAP) from 1994-1998 was extracted and analyzed by using SAS statistical software. Based on the Health Belief Model and Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization a prediction model was developed to examine the mammography utilization patterns and factors influencing the adherence to screening guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 27,778 women, 41.4% were adherent with mammography screening guidelines. According to the model tested in this study, race/ethnicity (Black vs White, OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.64-0.91); educational attainment (high school vs < high school, OR= 1.10, 95% CI= 1.04-1.18), college graduate vs < high school (OR=1.33, 95% CI=1.25-1.42); insurance status, (any coverage vs no coverage (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.25-2.12); and community economic status as defined by median income by zip code of residence ($15,000-$24,999 vs <$15,000, OR=0.84, 95% CI=0.76-0.94; >$55,000 vs <$15,000, OR 1.14, 95% CI=1.03-1.26) were statistically significant predictors of adherence to guidelines. Interaction between age and family history of breast cancer was statically significant. Younger females with a family history of breast cancer were less likely to be adherent than their counterparts without a family history (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.90-0.96). Inclusion or exclusion of women aged 70 years and older did not change the outcome of the analysis. CONCLUSION: The prediction model variables such as race/ethnicity, age and family history of breast cancer, educational level and community economic status, are associated with adherence status. Family history of breast cancer needs to be examined very carefully in future studies as it may play negative role in adherence to screening mammography.

预测40岁及以上女性乳房x光筛查指南依从性的理论模型。
目的:在一个监测数据库中检查与乳腺x线摄影筛查指南依从性相关的基于理论的选定因素。方法:提取1994-1998年美国科罗拉多州乳腺x线摄影项目(CMAP)资料,采用SAS统计软件进行分析。在健康信念模型和健康服务利用行为模型的基础上,建立了乳房x光检查利用模式和影响筛查指南依从性因素的预测模型。结果:在27,778名女性中,41.4%的人遵守了乳房x光检查指南。根据本研究检验的模型,种族/民族(黑人vs白人,OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.64-0.91);教育程度(高中vs <高中,OR= 1.10, 95% CI= 1.04-1.18),大学毕业vs <高中(OR=1.33, 95% CI=1.25-1.42);保险状况,(有保险vs无保险(OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.25-2.12);社区经济地位由居住地邮政编码的收入中位数定义(15,000- 24,999美元vs 55,000美元vs
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信