Variation in dementia screening outcomes: the influence of primary care providers' occupations and knowledge, attitudes, skills.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yanglin Qiu, Xinyu Fan, Yanjuan Wu, Shibin Wang, Wenyan Tan, Jing Liao
{"title":"Variation in dementia screening outcomes: the influence of primary care providers' occupations and knowledge, attitudes, skills.","authors":"Yanglin Qiu, Xinyu Fan, Yanjuan Wu, Shibin Wang, Wenyan Tan, Jing Liao","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02886-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia is a growing concern in China. Primary care screening is proposed as a timely and cost-effective way to identify potential cases, while its implementation relies on primary care providers' (PCPs') knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Our study aimed to investigate whether dementia screening outcomes vary according to the PCPs' occupations and how PCPs' knowledge, attitudes, and skills are associated with screening outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage dementia screening of residents aged 65 years and over in Guangdong, China was conducted using multistage cluster sampling. 252 PCPs, who completed questionnaires, were included in the analysis, along with 2823 older adults screened by them. Screening outcomes included the positive rate of screening, and positive predictive value (PPV). PCPs' knowledge was assessed by the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale, attitudes by the Dementia Care Attitudes Scale, and skills by a validated self-designed questionnaire. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the associations of PCPs' occupations, knowledge, attitudes, and skills with dementia screening outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Knowledge scores in dementia care differed significantly (P = 0.005) among PCPs of different occupations, while attitudes and skills did not. The positive screening rate had no significant association with PCPs' occupations. Public health physicians (OR = 2.927, 95%CI: 1.091-7.854) and nurses (OR = 3.712, 95%CI: 1.141-12.069) had a higher PPV than general practitioners (GPs). Higher dementia-care skills score (OR = 1.024, 95%CI: 1.004-1.046) was associated with a higher positive rate of screening. Positive attitudes towards dementia care was associated with a lower positive rate of screening (OR = 0.948, 95% CI: 0.905-0.994) and a higher PPV (OR = 1.114, 95% CI: 1.007-1.234).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In community settings, involving different occupations of PCPs besides GPs in dementia screening and systematically promoting dementia-care skills training and positive attitudes towards dementia care are important to improve the effectiveness of dementia screening and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02886-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dementia is a growing concern in China. Primary care screening is proposed as a timely and cost-effective way to identify potential cases, while its implementation relies on primary care providers' (PCPs') knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Our study aimed to investigate whether dementia screening outcomes vary according to the PCPs' occupations and how PCPs' knowledge, attitudes, and skills are associated with screening outcomes.

Methods: A two-stage dementia screening of residents aged 65 years and over in Guangdong, China was conducted using multistage cluster sampling. 252 PCPs, who completed questionnaires, were included in the analysis, along with 2823 older adults screened by them. Screening outcomes included the positive rate of screening, and positive predictive value (PPV). PCPs' knowledge was assessed by the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale, attitudes by the Dementia Care Attitudes Scale, and skills by a validated self-designed questionnaire. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the associations of PCPs' occupations, knowledge, attitudes, and skills with dementia screening outcomes.

Results: Knowledge scores in dementia care differed significantly (P = 0.005) among PCPs of different occupations, while attitudes and skills did not. The positive screening rate had no significant association with PCPs' occupations. Public health physicians (OR = 2.927, 95%CI: 1.091-7.854) and nurses (OR = 3.712, 95%CI: 1.141-12.069) had a higher PPV than general practitioners (GPs). Higher dementia-care skills score (OR = 1.024, 95%CI: 1.004-1.046) was associated with a higher positive rate of screening. Positive attitudes towards dementia care was associated with a lower positive rate of screening (OR = 0.948, 95% CI: 0.905-0.994) and a higher PPV (OR = 1.114, 95% CI: 1.007-1.234).

Conclusions: In community settings, involving different occupations of PCPs besides GPs in dementia screening and systematically promoting dementia-care skills training and positive attitudes towards dementia care are important to improve the effectiveness of dementia screening and management.

痴呆筛查结果的变化:初级保健提供者的职业和知识、态度、技能的影响
背景:痴呆症在中国日益受到关注。初级保健筛查被认为是一种及时且具有成本效益的识别潜在病例的方法,而其实施依赖于初级保健提供者(pcp)的知识、态度和技能。我们的研究旨在调查老年痴呆症筛查结果是否因pcp的职业而异,以及pcp的知识、态度和技能如何与筛查结果相关。方法:采用多阶段整群抽样的方法,对广东省65岁及以上居民进行两阶段痴呆筛查。252名完成问卷调查的pcp,以及他们筛选的2823名老年人,都被纳入了分析。筛查结果包括筛查阳性率、阳性预测值(PPV)。通过痴呆知识评估量表对pcp的知识进行评估,通过痴呆护理态度量表对pcp的态度进行评估,并通过自我设计的有效问卷对pcp的技能进行评估。采用多水平逻辑回归来评估pcp的职业、知识、态度和技能与痴呆筛查结果的关系。结果:不同职业pcp的痴呆护理知识得分差异显著(P = 0.005),态度和技能得分差异不显著。阳性筛查率与pcp的职业无显著相关性。公共卫生医生(OR = 2.927, 95%CI: 1.091 ~ 7.854)和护士(OR = 3.712, 95%CI: 1.141 ~ 12.069)的PPV高于全科医生(gp)。较高的痴呆护理技能得分(OR = 1.024, 95%CI: 1.004-1.046)与较高的筛查阳性率相关。对痴呆症护理的积极态度与较低的筛查阳性率(OR = 0.948, 95% CI: 0.905-0.994)和较高的PPV (OR = 1.114, 95% CI: 1.007-1.234)相关。结论:在社区环境下,除全科医生外,调动不同职业的pcp参与痴呆筛查,系统地促进痴呆护理技能培训和积极的痴呆护理态度,对提高痴呆筛查和管理的有效性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信