Research-practice partnerships in education: Benefits, challenges, methodological considerations and key enablers for change.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Sarah McGeown, Simon Sjölund
{"title":"Research-practice partnerships in education: Benefits, challenges, methodological considerations and key enablers for change.","authors":"Sarah McGeown, Simon Sjölund","doi":"10.1111/bjep.12785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research-practice partnerships reflect collaborations between researchers and practice-based professionals to co-produce new research knowledge and are often cited as one way to narrow the widely recognized gap between research and practice. Within the context of education, research-practice partnerships draw upon the knowledge, expertise and experience of researchers and practice professionals with the aim of co-producing methodologically robust and educationally relevant research aligned with priorities of practice. Over the last decade, this methodological approach has been gaining traction, yet it is not without its challenges and methodological considerations, which need to be understood and carefully navigated as this trajectory seems set to continue.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This article reviewed the benefits, challenges and methodological considerations associated with research-practice partnerships, and proposes four key enablers-infrastructure, funding, training and incentives-for research-practice partnerships to be optimally introduced, embedded and sustained.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drawing upon the research literature and diverse examples of infrastructure, funding, training and incentives across different European contexts, specifically Sweden, Norway, Germany, England and Scotland, this article aimed to synthesize academic and real-world insights to advance knowledge and thinking in this area.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article provides a contemporary account of key enablers that can initiate, develop, and sustain research-practice partnerships, drawing on insights from the research literature and illustrative examples of existing structures. In doing so, it aims to make a significant contribution to knowledge, thinking and potentially practice, as we work more collectively and productively together to reduce education inequalities and improve the educational experiences and outcomes of children and young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12785","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research-practice partnerships reflect collaborations between researchers and practice-based professionals to co-produce new research knowledge and are often cited as one way to narrow the widely recognized gap between research and practice. Within the context of education, research-practice partnerships draw upon the knowledge, expertise and experience of researchers and practice professionals with the aim of co-producing methodologically robust and educationally relevant research aligned with priorities of practice. Over the last decade, this methodological approach has been gaining traction, yet it is not without its challenges and methodological considerations, which need to be understood and carefully navigated as this trajectory seems set to continue.

Aims: This article reviewed the benefits, challenges and methodological considerations associated with research-practice partnerships, and proposes four key enablers-infrastructure, funding, training and incentives-for research-practice partnerships to be optimally introduced, embedded and sustained.

Methods: Drawing upon the research literature and diverse examples of infrastructure, funding, training and incentives across different European contexts, specifically Sweden, Norway, Germany, England and Scotland, this article aimed to synthesize academic and real-world insights to advance knowledge and thinking in this area.

Conclusions: This article provides a contemporary account of key enablers that can initiate, develop, and sustain research-practice partnerships, drawing on insights from the research literature and illustrative examples of existing structures. In doing so, it aims to make a significant contribution to knowledge, thinking and potentially practice, as we work more collectively and productively together to reduce education inequalities and improve the educational experiences and outcomes of children and young people.

教育中的研究与实践伙伴关系:利益、挑战、方法考虑和变革的关键推动因素。
背景:研究-实践伙伴关系反映了研究人员和以实践为基础的专业人员之间的合作,共同产生新的研究知识,经常被引用为缩小广泛认可的研究与实践之间差距的一种方式。在教育的背景下,研究-实践伙伴关系利用研究人员和实践专业人员的知识、专业知识和经验,目的是共同生产方法上可靠的、与教育相关的研究,与实践的优先事项保持一致。在过去的十年中,这种方法方法已经获得了牵引力,但它并非没有挑战和方法上的考虑,需要理解和仔细导航,因为这一轨迹似乎将继续下去。目的:本文回顾了与研究-实践伙伴关系相关的好处、挑战和方法考虑,并提出了四个关键的使能因素——基础设施、资金、培训和激励——以最佳方式引入、嵌入和维持研究-实践伙伴关系。方法:借鉴研究文献和不同欧洲背景下的基础设施、资金、培训和激励措施的不同例子,特别是瑞典、挪威、德国、英格兰和苏格兰,本文旨在综合学术和现实世界的见解,以推进这一领域的知识和思维。结论:本文根据研究文献和现有结构的说明性例子的见解,提供了可以启动、发展和维持研究-实践伙伴关系的关键促成因素的当代描述。在此过程中,它旨在为知识、思维和潜在的实践做出重大贡献,因为我们将更加集体和富有成效地共同努力,减少教育不平等,改善儿童和青少年的教育经历和成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信