Impact of Nurse-Driven Analgesia and Sedation Protocols on Medication Exposure and Withdrawal in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Laura Schianchi, Julia Harris
{"title":"Impact of Nurse-Driven Analgesia and Sedation Protocols on Medication Exposure and Withdrawal in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Laura Schianchi, Julia Harris","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The administration of analgesia and sedation is essential for patients admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). However, over-sedation can cause side effects, including iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS). The use of nurse-led analgesia and sedation protocols may improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine whether the use of such protocols can reduce opioid and benzodiazepine doses. Secondary outcome measures included documentation of pain and sedation scores, incidence of IWS, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and PICU/hospital length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted, searching several databases, including CINAHL, MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library. Pertinent articles were selected according to pre-determined eligibility criteria. The internal validity of included studies was assessed using validated critical appraisal tools for quantitative research from the Cochrane Library. Narrative synthesis was utilised for data analysis due to the heterogeneity of study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurse-led protocolised sedation significantly reduced the administered doses of benzodiazepines and the incidence of IWS. Moreover, the use of protocols significantly improved the documentation of pain and sedation scores across included studies. No significant difference in opioid use, duration of MV, and PICU/hospital LOS has been found. However, sub-group analyses for duration of MV and PICU/hospital LOS showed positive results in older children and those post-cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurse-driven analgesia and sedation protocols can reduce over-sedation and IWS in critically ill children. Further studies should explore the use of protocols in patient sub-groups where positive results have been reported.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Nurse-led analgesia and sedation protocols in PICU can improve outcomes and reduce costs. Effective implementation requires training and audits to boost nurses' confidence and autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 3","pages":"e70051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The administration of analgesia and sedation is essential for patients admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). However, over-sedation can cause side effects, including iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS). The use of nurse-led analgesia and sedation protocols may improve patient outcomes.

Aim: The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine whether the use of such protocols can reduce opioid and benzodiazepine doses. Secondary outcome measures included documentation of pain and sedation scores, incidence of IWS, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and PICU/hospital length of stay (LOS).

Study design: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, searching several databases, including CINAHL, MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library. Pertinent articles were selected according to pre-determined eligibility criteria. The internal validity of included studies was assessed using validated critical appraisal tools for quantitative research from the Cochrane Library. Narrative synthesis was utilised for data analysis due to the heterogeneity of study characteristics.

Results: Nurse-led protocolised sedation significantly reduced the administered doses of benzodiazepines and the incidence of IWS. Moreover, the use of protocols significantly improved the documentation of pain and sedation scores across included studies. No significant difference in opioid use, duration of MV, and PICU/hospital LOS has been found. However, sub-group analyses for duration of MV and PICU/hospital LOS showed positive results in older children and those post-cardiac surgery.

Conclusions: Nurse-driven analgesia and sedation protocols can reduce over-sedation and IWS in critically ill children. Further studies should explore the use of protocols in patient sub-groups where positive results have been reported.

Relevance to clinical practice: Nurse-led analgesia and sedation protocols in PICU can improve outcomes and reduce costs. Effective implementation requires training and audits to boost nurses' confidence and autonomy.

护士驱动的镇痛和镇静方案对危重儿童药物暴露和戒断的影响:一项系统综述。
背景:对儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的患者进行镇痛和镇静治疗是必不可少的。然而,过度镇静可引起副作用,包括医源性戒断综合征(IWS)。使用护士主导的镇痛和镇静方案可以改善患者的预后。目的:本系统综述的主要目的是确定使用此类方案是否可以减少阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物的剂量。次要结局指标包括疼痛和镇静评分记录、IWS发生率、机械通气时间(MV)和PICU/住院时间(LOS)。研究设计:系统回顾文献,检索多个数据库,包括CINAHL、MEDLINE、Academic Search Complete和Cochrane Library。根据预先确定的资格标准选择相关文章。纳入研究的内部效度使用Cochrane图书馆定量研究的有效关键评估工具进行评估。由于研究特征的异质性,采用叙事综合法进行数据分析。结果:护士主导的镇静方案显著减少了苯二氮卓类药物的给药剂量和IWS的发生率。此外,方案的使用显著改善了纳入研究的疼痛和镇静评分记录。阿片类药物使用、MV持续时间和PICU/医院LOS未发现显著差异。然而,对MV和PICU/医院LOS持续时间的亚组分析显示,年龄较大的儿童和心脏手术后的儿童获得了积极的结果。结论:护士主导的镇痛和镇静方案可减少危重患儿的过度镇静和IWS。进一步的研究应该探索在已报告阳性结果的患者亚组中使用方案。与临床实践的相关性:护士主导的PICU镇痛和镇静方案可以改善结果并降低成本。有效实施需要培训和审计,以增强护士的信心和自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信