Effect of Equalized and Nonequalized Resistance Training Volumes on Pain and Disability in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida, João Felipe Miranda Rios, David Bruno Braga de Castro, Bruno Augusto Lima Coelho, Bruno Manfredini Baroni, Rodrigo Ribeiro de Oliveira
{"title":"Effect of Equalized and Nonequalized Resistance Training Volumes on Pain and Disability in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.","authors":"Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida, João Felipe Miranda Rios, David Bruno Braga de Castro, Bruno Augusto Lima Coelho, Bruno Manfredini Baroni, Rodrigo Ribeiro de Oliveira","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate the effect of equalizing and nonequalizing resistance training volume on pain intensity, disability, and strength in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP). <b>DESIGN:</b> Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Epistemonikos were searched from inception to December 2024. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of any resistance exercise in individuals with PFP were included. The studies were categorized into groups with equalized and nonequalized total training volumes. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Separate random-effects meta-analyses comparing equalizing (experimental versus control) and nonequalizing (higher versus lower) resistance training volume were conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, and certainty of evidence was judged according to the GRADE framework. <b>RESULTS:</b> Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials (1853 participants) were included. The higher training volume group had improved pain intensity immediately after the intervention (SMD, -0.88; 95% CI: -1.39, -0.36) and beyond the intervention period (MD, -1.66; 95% CI: -3.02, -0.31), and improved disability immediately after the intervention (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.12) and beyond the intervention period (SMD, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.84) compared to the lower training volume group. When the training volume was equalized, there were no differences between the groups. There was no difference in muscle strength between the groups in equalized and nonequalized volumes. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> There was very low-certainty evidence that higher resistance training volume yielded better outcomes for pain intensity and disability compared to a lower volume. Equalized training volumes showed no differences. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(6):1-12. Epub 8 May 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13062</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 6","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of equalizing and nonequalizing resistance training volume on pain intensity, disability, and strength in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Epistemonikos were searched from inception to December 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of any resistance exercise in individuals with PFP were included. The studies were categorized into groups with equalized and nonequalized total training volumes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Separate random-effects meta-analyses comparing equalizing (experimental versus control) and nonequalizing (higher versus lower) resistance training volume were conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, and certainty of evidence was judged according to the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials (1853 participants) were included. The higher training volume group had improved pain intensity immediately after the intervention (SMD, -0.88; 95% CI: -1.39, -0.36) and beyond the intervention period (MD, -1.66; 95% CI: -3.02, -0.31), and improved disability immediately after the intervention (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.12) and beyond the intervention period (SMD, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.84) compared to the lower training volume group. When the training volume was equalized, there were no differences between the groups. There was no difference in muscle strength between the groups in equalized and nonequalized volumes. CONCLUSION: There was very low-certainty evidence that higher resistance training volume yielded better outcomes for pain intensity and disability compared to a lower volume. Equalized training volumes showed no differences. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(6):1-12. Epub 8 May 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13062.

均衡和非均衡阻力训练量对髌股痛患者疼痛和残疾的影响:一项meta分析的系统综述。
目的:探讨均衡和非均衡阻力训练量对髌骨股痛(PFP)患者疼痛强度、残疾和力量的影响。设计:采用meta分析的干预系统评价。文献检索:MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL,物理治疗证据数据库,Scopus, SPORTDiscus和Epistemonikos从成立到2024年12月检索。研究选择标准:纳入随机对照试验,评估任何阻力运动对PFP个体的影响。这些研究被分为总训练量相等和总训练量不相等两组。数据综合:进行了单独的随机效应荟萃分析,比较均衡(实验与对照)和非均衡(高与低)阻力训练量。使用Cochrane Risk of bias 2评估偏倚风险,并根据GRADE框架判断证据的确定性。结果:纳入37项随机对照试验(1853名受试者)。高训练量组在干预后立即改善疼痛强度(SMD, -0.88;95% CI: -1.39, -0.36)及干预期后(MD, -1.66;95% CI: -3.02, -0.31),干预后立即改善残疾(SMD, 0.66;95% CI: 0.19, 1.12)及干预期后(SMD, 1.03;95% CI: 0.22, 1.84)与低训练量组相比。当训练量相等时,两组之间没有差异。在体积相等和体积不相等的情况下,两组之间的肌肉力量没有差异。结论:有非常低确定性的证据表明,与低阻力训练量相比,高阻力训练量对疼痛强度和残疾的治疗效果更好。相等的训练量显示没有差异。[J] .体育学报,2015;55(6):1-12。2025年5月8日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.13062。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信