Effect of Equalized and Nonequalized Resistance Training Volumes on Pain and Disability in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.
Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida, João Felipe Miranda Rios, David Bruno Braga de Castro, Bruno Augusto Lima Coelho, Bruno Manfredini Baroni, Rodrigo Ribeiro de Oliveira
{"title":"Effect of Equalized and Nonequalized Resistance Training Volumes on Pain and Disability in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.","authors":"Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida, João Felipe Miranda Rios, David Bruno Braga de Castro, Bruno Augusto Lima Coelho, Bruno Manfredini Baroni, Rodrigo Ribeiro de Oliveira","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate the effect of equalizing and nonequalizing resistance training volume on pain intensity, disability, and strength in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP). <b>DESIGN:</b> Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Epistemonikos were searched from inception to December 2024. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of any resistance exercise in individuals with PFP were included. The studies were categorized into groups with equalized and nonequalized total training volumes. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Separate random-effects meta-analyses comparing equalizing (experimental versus control) and nonequalizing (higher versus lower) resistance training volume were conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, and certainty of evidence was judged according to the GRADE framework. <b>RESULTS:</b> Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials (1853 participants) were included. The higher training volume group had improved pain intensity immediately after the intervention (SMD, -0.88; 95% CI: -1.39, -0.36) and beyond the intervention period (MD, -1.66; 95% CI: -3.02, -0.31), and improved disability immediately after the intervention (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.12) and beyond the intervention period (SMD, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.84) compared to the lower training volume group. When the training volume was equalized, there were no differences between the groups. There was no difference in muscle strength between the groups in equalized and nonequalized volumes. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> There was very low-certainty evidence that higher resistance training volume yielded better outcomes for pain intensity and disability compared to a lower volume. Equalized training volumes showed no differences. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(6):1-12. Epub 8 May 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13062</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 6","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of equalizing and nonequalizing resistance training volume on pain intensity, disability, and strength in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Epistemonikos were searched from inception to December 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of any resistance exercise in individuals with PFP were included. The studies were categorized into groups with equalized and nonequalized total training volumes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Separate random-effects meta-analyses comparing equalizing (experimental versus control) and nonequalizing (higher versus lower) resistance training volume were conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, and certainty of evidence was judged according to the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials (1853 participants) were included. The higher training volume group had improved pain intensity immediately after the intervention (SMD, -0.88; 95% CI: -1.39, -0.36) and beyond the intervention period (MD, -1.66; 95% CI: -3.02, -0.31), and improved disability immediately after the intervention (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.12) and beyond the intervention period (SMD, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.84) compared to the lower training volume group. When the training volume was equalized, there were no differences between the groups. There was no difference in muscle strength between the groups in equalized and nonequalized volumes. CONCLUSION: There was very low-certainty evidence that higher resistance training volume yielded better outcomes for pain intensity and disability compared to a lower volume. Equalized training volumes showed no differences. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(6):1-12. Epub 8 May 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13062.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics.
With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.