The Impact of Standard Versus Weight-Based Maintenance Dosing of Fosphenytoin on Achieving Therapeutic Drug Levels.

IF 2.9 4区 医学
Madison Milby, Theresa Kwarciany, Lindsey Jarboe, Lindsay Weitkamp
{"title":"The Impact of Standard Versus Weight-Based Maintenance Dosing of Fosphenytoin on Achieving Therapeutic Drug Levels.","authors":"Madison Milby, Theresa Kwarciany, Lindsey Jarboe, Lindsay Weitkamp","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fosphenytoin is an antiepileptic drug (AED) used for the treatment of many seizure subtypes as well as seizure prophylaxis. Dosing of fosphenytoin has traditionally been weight-based, however, there is data to support standard dosing, making the optimal dosing strategy unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of standard versus weight-based maintenance dosing of fosphenytoin on achieving therapeutic serum phenytoin levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of patients admitted at two medical centers between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2023 who received fosphenytoin maintenance therapy. Patients were divided into two groups based on initial maintenance dose: standard dosing (100 mg every 8 h) and weight-based dosing. The primary outcome was the incidence of the first serum phenytoin level being therapeutic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 92 patients with an average age of 56.9 years were included, 47 patients in the weight-based dosing group and 45 patients in the standard dosing group. The mean corrected total and free phenytoin levels were 12.8 and 1.6 mcg/mL respectively in the weight-based dosing group compared to 12.1 and 1.45 mcg/mL in the standard dosing group. A total of 32 patients in the weight-based dosing group had a therapeutic level compared to 25 patients in the standard dosing group, which was not significantly different (68% versus 55.6%, P =  0.283).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found no difference in the incidence of first serum phenytoin level being therapeutic based on fosphenytoin dosing strategy utilized. Further prospective studies should be conducted to evaluate fosphenytoin maintenance dosing strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fosphenytoin is an antiepileptic drug (AED) used for the treatment of many seizure subtypes as well as seizure prophylaxis. Dosing of fosphenytoin has traditionally been weight-based, however, there is data to support standard dosing, making the optimal dosing strategy unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of standard versus weight-based maintenance dosing of fosphenytoin on achieving therapeutic serum phenytoin levels.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients admitted at two medical centers between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2023 who received fosphenytoin maintenance therapy. Patients were divided into two groups based on initial maintenance dose: standard dosing (100 mg every 8 h) and weight-based dosing. The primary outcome was the incidence of the first serum phenytoin level being therapeutic.

Results: A total of 92 patients with an average age of 56.9 years were included, 47 patients in the weight-based dosing group and 45 patients in the standard dosing group. The mean corrected total and free phenytoin levels were 12.8 and 1.6 mcg/mL respectively in the weight-based dosing group compared to 12.1 and 1.45 mcg/mL in the standard dosing group. A total of 32 patients in the weight-based dosing group had a therapeutic level compared to 25 patients in the standard dosing group, which was not significantly different (68% versus 55.6%, P =  0.283).

Conclusion: This study found no difference in the incidence of first serum phenytoin level being therapeutic based on fosphenytoin dosing strategy utilized. Further prospective studies should be conducted to evaluate fosphenytoin maintenance dosing strategies.

磷妥英的标准剂量与体重维持剂量对达到治疗药物水平的影响。
背景:磷苯妥英是一种抗癫痫药物(AED),用于治疗多种癫痫亚型和预防癫痫发作。磷苯妥英的剂量传统上是基于体重的,然而,有数据支持标准剂量,使最佳剂量策略不明确。本研究的目的是评估磷妥英标准剂量与体重维持剂量对达到治疗性血清苯妥英水平的影响。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月1日至2023年10月31日在两家医疗中心接受磷妥英维持治疗的患者。根据初始维持剂量将患者分为两组:标准给药(100mg / 8h)和体重给药。主要结果是第一次血清苯妥英水平的发生率是治疗性的。结果:共纳入92例患者,平均年龄56.9岁,体重给药组47例,标准给药组45例。体重给药组校正后总苯妥英和游离苯妥英的平均水平分别为12.8和1.6微克/毫升,而标准给药组校正后总苯妥英和游离苯妥英的平均水平分别为12.1和1.45微克/毫升。体重给药组共有32例患者达到治疗水平,而标准给药组有25例患者达到治疗水平,差异无统计学意义(68%对55.6%,P = 0.283)。结论:本研究发现不同的苯妥英给药策略对首次血清苯妥英水平的发生率无差异。进一步的前瞻性研究应进行评估磷英妥英维持剂量策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信