Methodology for the knowledge-based selection of occupational exoskeletons.

IF 1.7 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Tobias Drees, Lennart Ralfs, Benjamin Reimeir, Kai Lemmerz, Robert Weidner, Bernd Kuhlenkötter
{"title":"Methodology for the knowledge-based selection of occupational exoskeletons.","authors":"Tobias Drees, Lennart Ralfs, Benjamin Reimeir, Kai Lemmerz, Robert Weidner, Bernd Kuhlenkötter","doi":"10.1007/s11740-025-01338-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Occupational exoskeletons for industrial workplaces hold significant promise for improving worker ergonomics and safety. However, the successful selection of an exoskeleton depends on informed decision-making processes that consider various factors ranging from biomechanical performance to usability and compatibility with work tasks. This paper presents a methodology that aims to develop a co-simulation-based selection tool for selecting an exoskeleton for specific industrial work tasks. It integrates multidisciplinary knowledge from biomechanics, human factors engineering, and industrial ergonomics for assessing the suitability of exoskeletons across diverse industrial applications. The methodology is designed as a stage-gate process with five main stages corresponding to the product development process. It describes the main tasks in each phase, their results, and the gates between the stages. The tasks and results are derived and detailed from the current literature and preliminary work. The gates include the specification of the simulation and decision-relevant input and output parameters, the design of the co-simulation model consisting of task and biomechanical simulation, the weighting of the individual decision criteria, and the subsequent implementation of the multi-criteria decision analysis to create a ranking of suitable exoskeletons. This work concludes by elaborating on the impact of the novel co-simulation methodology on research and industry. Research implications include advanced simulation methods for exoskeleton evaluation, the systematic comparison of different exoskeletons, and the development of decision analysis models. Benefits to the industry include improved compatibility, informed selection processes, reduced investment risks, and increased technology adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":47298,"journal":{"name":"Production Engineering-Research and Development","volume":"19 3-4","pages":"763-780"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production Engineering-Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-025-01338-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational exoskeletons for industrial workplaces hold significant promise for improving worker ergonomics and safety. However, the successful selection of an exoskeleton depends on informed decision-making processes that consider various factors ranging from biomechanical performance to usability and compatibility with work tasks. This paper presents a methodology that aims to develop a co-simulation-based selection tool for selecting an exoskeleton for specific industrial work tasks. It integrates multidisciplinary knowledge from biomechanics, human factors engineering, and industrial ergonomics for assessing the suitability of exoskeletons across diverse industrial applications. The methodology is designed as a stage-gate process with five main stages corresponding to the product development process. It describes the main tasks in each phase, their results, and the gates between the stages. The tasks and results are derived and detailed from the current literature and preliminary work. The gates include the specification of the simulation and decision-relevant input and output parameters, the design of the co-simulation model consisting of task and biomechanical simulation, the weighting of the individual decision criteria, and the subsequent implementation of the multi-criteria decision analysis to create a ranking of suitable exoskeletons. This work concludes by elaborating on the impact of the novel co-simulation methodology on research and industry. Research implications include advanced simulation methods for exoskeleton evaluation, the systematic comparison of different exoskeletons, and the development of decision analysis models. Benefits to the industry include improved compatibility, informed selection processes, reduced investment risks, and increased technology adoption.

基于知识的职业外骨骼选择方法。
用于工业工作场所的职业外骨骼对改善工人的人体工程学和安全性有着重大的希望。然而,外骨骼的成功选择取决于明智的决策过程,考虑各种因素,从生物力学性能到可用性和与工作任务的兼容性。本文提出了一种方法,旨在开发一种基于联合仿真的选择工具,用于为特定的工业工作任务选择外骨骼。它整合了来自生物力学、人为因素工程和工业人体工程学的多学科知识,用于评估外骨骼在不同工业应用中的适用性。该方法被设计为一个阶段门过程,与产品开发过程相对应的五个主要阶段。它描述了每个阶段的主要任务,它们的结果,以及阶段之间的门。任务和结果是从目前的文献和初步工作中衍生和详细的。其中包括仿真和决策相关输入输出参数的规范、任务模拟和生物力学模拟联合仿真模型的设计、单个决策标准的加权以及后续实施多准则决策分析以创建合适外骨骼的排名。这项工作最后阐述了新型联合模拟方法对研究和工业的影响。研究内容包括外骨骼评估的先进模拟方法,不同外骨骼的系统比较以及决策分析模型的开发。对行业的好处包括改进兼容性、明智的选择过程、降低投资风险和提高技术采用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The journal reports peer reviewed results of latest research in industrial engineering, production engineering and industrial organization. The high level and focus on both the scientific as well as the practical impact of the selected papers will bridge the gap between research and successful industrial application. Researchers in production engineering as well as in operation management and supply chain organization will find recent valuable developments. The main topics span from novel production processes via computer aided engineering to process chain and factory management. Frequently published key note papers provide succinct reviews on the recent progress in particular research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信