The Effectiveness of Mulligan's Techniques in Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 REHABILITATION
Jordana Barbosa-Silva, Alexandre Luc, Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza, Raphael Martins de Abreu, Jakelline Cipriano, Marine de Schaetzen, Laurent Pitance, Susan Armijo-Olivo
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Mulligan's Techniques in Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jordana Barbosa-Silva, Alexandre Luc, Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza, Raphael Martins de Abreu, Jakelline Cipriano, Marine de Schaetzen, Laurent Pitance, Susan Armijo-Olivo","doi":"10.1002/pri.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Mulligan's techniques, such as Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) and Natural Apophyseal Glides (NAGs), are commonly applied by physiotherapists when treating patients with non-specific neck pain (NP). However, there has been no comprehensive synthesis of their effects in NP. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of Mulligan's techniques in reducing pain, improving disability, and enhancing cervical range of motion (CROM) in adults with acute, subacute, or chronic NP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Mulligan's techniques with other interventions in adults with NP. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB) assessment. Meta-analyses were performed when clinical homogeneity was present; otherwise, a narrative synthesis was used. Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies were included. For acute and mixed (acute/subacute/chronic) NP, Mulligan's techniques were no more effective than other interventions for pain reduction, disability improvement, or CROM enhancement. However, in patients with chronic or uncertain chronicity NP, SNAGs combined with other interventions demonstrated superior outcomes-both statistically and sometimes clinically-compared to certain treatments like exercises and muscle-energy techniques, for reducing pain and disability and improving CROM. The certainty of evidence was rated very low.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Mulligan's techniques appear to be safe, simple, and potentially beneficial for managing mixed or chronic NP when combined with other interventions, presenting results that may be comparable or occasionally superior to other standard techniques.</p><p><strong>Implications for physiotherapy practice: </strong>Physiotherapists may consider incorporating Mulligan's techniques, especially SNAGs, within broader NP treatment strategies, as they offer a feasible, low-risk option for improving patient outcomes, particularly for chronic NP cases when used alongside other therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 3","pages":"e70045"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Mulligan's techniques, such as Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) and Natural Apophyseal Glides (NAGs), are commonly applied by physiotherapists when treating patients with non-specific neck pain (NP). However, there has been no comprehensive synthesis of their effects in NP. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of Mulligan's techniques in reducing pain, improving disability, and enhancing cervical range of motion (CROM) in adults with acute, subacute, or chronic NP.

Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Mulligan's techniques with other interventions in adults with NP. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB) assessment. Meta-analyses were performed when clinical homogeneity was present; otherwise, a narrative synthesis was used. Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

Results: Thirty-three studies were included. For acute and mixed (acute/subacute/chronic) NP, Mulligan's techniques were no more effective than other interventions for pain reduction, disability improvement, or CROM enhancement. However, in patients with chronic or uncertain chronicity NP, SNAGs combined with other interventions demonstrated superior outcomes-both statistically and sometimes clinically-compared to certain treatments like exercises and muscle-energy techniques, for reducing pain and disability and improving CROM. The certainty of evidence was rated very low.

Discussion: Mulligan's techniques appear to be safe, simple, and potentially beneficial for managing mixed or chronic NP when combined with other interventions, presenting results that may be comparable or occasionally superior to other standard techniques.

Implications for physiotherapy practice: Physiotherapists may consider incorporating Mulligan's techniques, especially SNAGs, within broader NP treatment strategies, as they offer a feasible, low-risk option for improving patient outcomes, particularly for chronic NP cases when used alongside other therapies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Mulligan技术治疗非特异性颈部疼痛的有效性:一项系统综述和meta分析。
背景和目的:Mulligan的技术,如持续自然棘突滑动(SNAGs)和自然棘突滑动(nag),是物理治疗师在治疗非特异性颈痛(NP)患者时常用的技术。然而,目前还没有对其在NP中的作用进行全面的综合研究。本综述旨在评估Mulligan技术在减轻成人急性、亚急性或慢性NP患者疼痛、改善残疾和增强颈椎活动度(CROM)方面的有效性。方法:对随机对照试验(rct)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较Mulligan技术与其他干预措施对NP成人的影响。两位审稿人独立进行了研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险(RoB)评估。当存在临床同质性时进行meta分析;除此之外,还使用了叙事综合。使用建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法对证据的确定性进行评级。结果:纳入33项研究。对于急性和混合(急性/亚急性/慢性)NP, Mulligan技术在减轻疼痛、改善残疾或增强CROM方面并不比其他干预措施更有效。然而,在慢性或不确定慢性NP患者中,与某些治疗方法(如运动和肌肉能量技术)相比,SNAGs联合其他干预措施在减轻疼痛和残疾以及改善CROM方面显示出更好的结果——无论是在统计上还是在临床上。证据的确定性被评为非常低。讨论:Mulligan的技术似乎是安全、简单的,当与其他干预措施结合时,对于混合性或慢性NP的治疗可能是有益的,其结果可能与其他标准技术相当,有时甚至优于其他标准技术。对物理治疗实践的影响:物理治疗师可以考虑将Mulligan的技术,特别是SNAGs,纳入更广泛的NP治疗策略中,因为它们为改善患者预后提供了可行的低风险选择,特别是对于慢性NP病例,当与其他疗法一起使用时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信