The "Newborn Gang" Scandal in Türkiye: Ethics in a Neoliberal Health System.

IF 1.8 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Maide Barış, Gürkan Sert, M İnanç Özekmekçi
{"title":"The \"Newborn Gang\" Scandal in Türkiye: Ethics in a Neoliberal Health System.","authors":"Maide Barış, Gürkan Sert, M İnanç Özekmekçi","doi":"10.1007/s10728-025-00522-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In October 2024, Türkiye was shocked by the \"Newborn Gang\" scandal, in which a network of healthcare professionals allegedly exploited newborns for financial gain in private hospitals. The accused are charged with intentionally neglecting, mistreating or even killing of healthy infants in neonatal intensive care units to prolong their stays and maximize government reimbursements. This paper critically examines the structural and ethical failures exposed by the 2024 \"Newborn Gang\" scandal in Türkiye, in which healthcare professionals in private hospitals allegedly allowed or caused the deaths of newborns to profit from the state's healthcare reimbursement system. Drawing on the frameworks of neoliberal critique and medical humanities, the study argues that such extreme violations are not isolated incidents of individual misconduct, but manifestations of deeper systemic vulnerabilities fostered by the neoliberalization of healthcare. It explores how deregulation, market incentives, and the erosion of ethical values-exacerbated by Türkiye's Health Transformation Program-have created an environment where financial gain is prioritized over patient welfare. Comparative case studies are employed to contextualize these findings within broader global patterns of ethical collapse in healthcare systems influenced by market logic. The paper contends that merely strengthening oversight is insufficient; rather, a structural reorientation is needed. As a potential alternative, the study introduces Value-Based Healthcare as a model that aligns clinical outcomes with ethical imperatives. Ultimately, the paper calls for a fundamental moral recalibration of healthcare-one that affirms care, integrity, and justice as core values over profit and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-025-00522-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In October 2024, Türkiye was shocked by the "Newborn Gang" scandal, in which a network of healthcare professionals allegedly exploited newborns for financial gain in private hospitals. The accused are charged with intentionally neglecting, mistreating or even killing of healthy infants in neonatal intensive care units to prolong their stays and maximize government reimbursements. This paper critically examines the structural and ethical failures exposed by the 2024 "Newborn Gang" scandal in Türkiye, in which healthcare professionals in private hospitals allegedly allowed or caused the deaths of newborns to profit from the state's healthcare reimbursement system. Drawing on the frameworks of neoliberal critique and medical humanities, the study argues that such extreme violations are not isolated incidents of individual misconduct, but manifestations of deeper systemic vulnerabilities fostered by the neoliberalization of healthcare. It explores how deregulation, market incentives, and the erosion of ethical values-exacerbated by Türkiye's Health Transformation Program-have created an environment where financial gain is prioritized over patient welfare. Comparative case studies are employed to contextualize these findings within broader global patterns of ethical collapse in healthcare systems influenced by market logic. The paper contends that merely strengthening oversight is insufficient; rather, a structural reorientation is needed. As a potential alternative, the study introduces Value-Based Healthcare as a model that aligns clinical outcomes with ethical imperatives. Ultimately, the paper calls for a fundamental moral recalibration of healthcare-one that affirms care, integrity, and justice as core values over profit and efficiency.

基耶的“新生儿帮”丑闻:新自由主义医疗体系中的伦理。
2024年10月, rkiye对“新生儿帮”丑闻感到震惊,其中一个医疗保健专业人员网络据称在私立医院剥削新生儿以获取经济利益。被告被控故意忽视、虐待甚至杀害新生儿重症监护病房的健康婴儿,以延长他们的住院时间,并最大限度地获得政府报销。本文批判性地审视了2024年 rkiye“新生儿帮”丑闻所暴露的结构和道德失误,在该丑闻中,私立医院的医疗保健专业人员据称允许或导致新生儿死亡,以从国家的医疗报销体系中获利。利用新自由主义批判和医学人文学科的框架,该研究认为,这种极端侵犯行为不是个人不当行为的孤立事件,而是医疗保健新自由主义化所滋生的更深层次的系统脆弱性的表现。它探讨了放松管制、市场激励和道德价值观的侵蚀——由 rkiye的健康转型计划加剧——如何创造了一个经济利益优先于患者福利的环境。采用比较案例研究将这些发现置于受市场逻辑影响的医疗保健系统中道德崩溃的更广泛的全球模式的背景下。文章认为,仅仅加强监管是不够的;相反,需要进行结构性调整。作为一种潜在的替代方案,该研究引入了基于价值的医疗保健作为一种模型,使临床结果与伦理要求保持一致。最后,这篇论文呼吁对医疗保健进行基本的道德调整——确认护理、诚信和公正是高于利润和效率的核心价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信