Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing disease knowledge and self-care (ARKSc) level among allergic rhinitis patients.

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2025-05-01
A H H Ahmad Nizar, A Aziz, B Abdullah, A K Azidah, W M Zahiruddin, N S Abd Mutalib
{"title":"Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing disease knowledge and self-care (ARKSc) level among allergic rhinitis patients.","authors":"A H H Ahmad Nizar, A Aziz, B Abdullah, A K Azidah, W M Zahiruddin, N S Abd Mutalib","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding a patient's knowledge and selfcare level regarding allergic rhinitis (AR) is essential these factors significantly influence treatment outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of validated measurement tools specifically designed to assess disease knowledge and selfcare among patients with AR. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a new questionnaire - the Allergic Rhinitis Knowledge and Self-care (ARKSc) questionnairefor this purpose.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire development and validation study was conducted in two phase. The first phase involved developing a self-administered questionnaire through literature review and consultations with an expert panel. Content validation was evaluated by a group of content experts using the content validity index (CVI), while face validity was assessed by AR patients using the Face Validity Index (FVI). In the second phase, construct validity of the final ARKSc questionnaire was examined at Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Kedah, Malaysia and Universiti Sains Malaysia Specialist Hospital (HPUSM), Kelantan, Malaysia involving 136 AR patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability analysis were performed to assess the factorial structure and internal consistency of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preliminary questionnaire included 16 questions (22 items) assessing AR knowledge and 11 questions on self-care. During content validation, three items with low item-CVI (I-CVI) score were removed. The average Scale-CVI (S-CVI/Ave) for both knowledge and selfcare domains was 0.83. The scale-level face validity index value (S-FVI/Ave) 0.95, indicating excellent clarity and comprehensibility. Following construct validation, the final version of questionnaire consisted of 11 items in the knowledge section and 4 items in self-care section. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.659 for the knowledge section, and 0.663 for the self-care section, reflecting acceptable internal consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly developed and validated ARKSc questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing disease knowledge and self-care among patients with allergic rhinitis. This study provides a foundation for future development of more refined tools and underscores the importance of evaluating these domains to enhance disease management and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"80 3","pages":"335-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding a patient's knowledge and selfcare level regarding allergic rhinitis (AR) is essential these factors significantly influence treatment outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of validated measurement tools specifically designed to assess disease knowledge and selfcare among patients with AR. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a new questionnaire - the Allergic Rhinitis Knowledge and Self-care (ARKSc) questionnairefor this purpose.

Material and methods: A questionnaire development and validation study was conducted in two phase. The first phase involved developing a self-administered questionnaire through literature review and consultations with an expert panel. Content validation was evaluated by a group of content experts using the content validity index (CVI), while face validity was assessed by AR patients using the Face Validity Index (FVI). In the second phase, construct validity of the final ARKSc questionnaire was examined at Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Kedah, Malaysia and Universiti Sains Malaysia Specialist Hospital (HPUSM), Kelantan, Malaysia involving 136 AR patients. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability analysis were performed to assess the factorial structure and internal consistency of the questionnaire.

Results: The preliminary questionnaire included 16 questions (22 items) assessing AR knowledge and 11 questions on self-care. During content validation, three items with low item-CVI (I-CVI) score were removed. The average Scale-CVI (S-CVI/Ave) for both knowledge and selfcare domains was 0.83. The scale-level face validity index value (S-FVI/Ave) 0.95, indicating excellent clarity and comprehensibility. Following construct validation, the final version of questionnaire consisted of 11 items in the knowledge section and 4 items in self-care section. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.659 for the knowledge section, and 0.663 for the self-care section, reflecting acceptable internal consistency.

Conclusion: The newly developed and validated ARKSc questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing disease knowledge and self-care among patients with allergic rhinitis. This study provides a foundation for future development of more refined tools and underscores the importance of evaluating these domains to enhance disease management and patient outcomes.

变态反应性鼻炎患者疾病知识和自我保健(ARKSc)水平评估问卷的编制和验证
了解患者关于变应性鼻炎(AR)的知识和自我护理水平是必不可少的,这些因素显著影响治疗结果。目前,缺乏专门用于评估AR患者疾病知识和自我保健的有效测量工具。因此,本研究旨在为此开发和验证一份新的问卷-变应性鼻炎知识和自我保健(ARKSc)问卷。材料与方法:问卷编制与验证研究分两期进行。第一阶段涉及通过文献审查和与专家小组协商制定一份自我管理的问卷。内容验证由一组内容专家使用内容效度指数(CVI)进行评估,而面部效度由AR患者使用面部效度指数(FVI)进行评估。在第二阶段,在马来西亚吉打州苏丹阿卜杜勒哈利姆医院和马来西亚吉兰丹大学马来西亚专科医院(HPUSM)检查了最终ARKSc问卷的结构效度,涉及136名AR患者。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和信度分析评估问卷的因子结构和内部一致性。结果:初步问卷包括评估AR知识16题(22题)和自我护理11题。在内容验证过程中,剔除3个项目cvi (I-CVI)得分较低的项目。知识和自我保健领域的平均量表- cvi (S-CVI/Ave)为0.83。量表面效度指数(S-FVI/Ave)为0.95,表明具有良好的清晰度和可理解性。经结构验证,终版问卷包括知识部分的11项和自我照顾部分的4项。知识部分的Cronbach’s alpha为0.659,自我保健部分的Cronbach’s alpha为0.663,反映了可接受的内部一致性。结论:ARKSc问卷是评估变应性鼻炎患者疾病知识和自我护理的有效、可靠的工具。该研究为未来开发更精细的工具奠定了基础,并强调了评估这些领域对加强疾病管理和患者预后的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信