{"title":"Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in transcatheter structural heart interventions.","authors":"Panagiotis Theofilis, Panayotis K Vlachakis, Paschalis Karakasis, Evangelos Oikonomou, Athanasios Sakalidis, Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Dimitris Tousoulis","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.05.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling describes the interaction between right ventricular contractility and pulmonary arterial afterload, offering a comprehensive assessment of right heart function. In the context of structural heart interventions such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral repair (TEER), and transcatheter tricuspid therapies, RV-PA coupling has emerged as a powerful prognostic indicator. Impaired coupling, typically defined using echocardiographic surrogates such as the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) ratio, is consistently associated with increased mortality and heart failure hospitalization. RV-PA coupling also demonstrates dynamic behavior, with potential for improvement following intervention-though persistent uncoupling portends worse outcomes. Despite its clinical promise, significant limitations exist. Commonly used non-invasive indices, while practical, only moderately correlate with gold-standard invasive pressure-volume loop assessments and are subject to measurement variability and lack of standardization. Furthermore, current surrogates do not distinguish between the underlying drivers of uncoupling-whether impaired contractility or increased afterload-each with distinct therapeutic implications. As structural heart interventions expand to broader patient populations, a more refined understanding of RV-PA coupling may enhance risk stratification, procedural planning, and long-term management. Future research should focus on standardizing assessment techniques and establishing evidence-based thresholds to support its routine clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.05.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling describes the interaction between right ventricular contractility and pulmonary arterial afterload, offering a comprehensive assessment of right heart function. In the context of structural heart interventions such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral repair (TEER), and transcatheter tricuspid therapies, RV-PA coupling has emerged as a powerful prognostic indicator. Impaired coupling, typically defined using echocardiographic surrogates such as the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) ratio, is consistently associated with increased mortality and heart failure hospitalization. RV-PA coupling also demonstrates dynamic behavior, with potential for improvement following intervention-though persistent uncoupling portends worse outcomes. Despite its clinical promise, significant limitations exist. Commonly used non-invasive indices, while practical, only moderately correlate with gold-standard invasive pressure-volume loop assessments and are subject to measurement variability and lack of standardization. Furthermore, current surrogates do not distinguish between the underlying drivers of uncoupling-whether impaired contractility or increased afterload-each with distinct therapeutic implications. As structural heart interventions expand to broader patient populations, a more refined understanding of RV-PA coupling may enhance risk stratification, procedural planning, and long-term management. Future research should focus on standardizing assessment techniques and establishing evidence-based thresholds to support its routine clinical use.
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.