A retrospective comparison study of delayed admissions into the critical care unit.

IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/17511437251333268
Simran Aujla, Sanjog Banstola, Shondipon Laha, Craig Marshall
{"title":"A retrospective comparison study of delayed admissions into the critical care unit.","authors":"Simran Aujla, Sanjog Banstola, Shondipon Laha, Craig Marshall","doi":"10.1177/17511437251333268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about the effect of alternative patient routes prior to ICU admission on clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study compared patients that were admitted directly from the emergency department into the ICU with those admitted from the wards. Patients admitted from the wards had significantly higher SOFA (6 vs 5, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and APACHE scores (19 vs 16, <i>p</i> = 0.007), as well as a greater need for invasive ventilation (45.5% vs 28.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Hence, this hypothesis-generating study suggests that further work is needed to assess if scoring systems are sensitive enough to assess the need for ICU admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"404-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251333268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about the effect of alternative patient routes prior to ICU admission on clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study compared patients that were admitted directly from the emergency department into the ICU with those admitted from the wards. Patients admitted from the wards had significantly higher SOFA (6 vs 5, p = 0.038) and APACHE scores (19 vs 16, p = 0.007), as well as a greater need for invasive ventilation (45.5% vs 28.6%, p < 0.001). Hence, this hypothesis-generating study suggests that further work is needed to assess if scoring systems are sensitive enough to assess the need for ICU admission.

一项延迟入住重症监护病房的回顾性比较研究。
关于ICU入院前患者的替代路线对临床结果的影响知之甚少。因此,本研究比较了直接从急诊科进入ICU的患者和从病房进入ICU的患者。从病房入院的患者有更高的SOFA(6比5,p = 0.038)和APACHE评分(19比16,p = 0.007),以及更大的有创通气需求(45.5%比28.6%,p = 0.007)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信